It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I hadn't been aware of this, is it confirmed?
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: D8Tee
That is the Russian connection, having the DNC refuse to hand their servers over to the FBI and instead let Crowdstrike do the investigation.
Yep. And on a Friday, June 10th, all DNC employees were told to leave their laptops in the office. They were not told what for. And, during the next two days, the CrowdStrike team working inside DNC headquarters replaced the software and set up new login credentials and new passwords.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: TomLawless
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
Yes, case closed as we KNOW Crowdstrike are lied and completely discredited.
So... you are going to discard all the evidence it was the Russians because either the source is anonymous or discredited, and the rest of the evidence, though overwhelming, is merely "circumstantial." Instead, you favor a complicated theory for which there are no reliable sources and for which the "evidence" is entirely circumstantial?
I haven't discarded any evidence. There is no evidence.
If there was it would have been leaked already.
Indeed. All we have is the word of the DNC outsourced IT organisation - the same people as you well know who got busted pushing their "fancy bear" nonsense in another case.
Crowdstrike based their findings on supposed similarities in hacking procedures used to allegedly shut down Ukranian anti aircraft missiles.
The problem with that is that the Ukranians denied shortly after the report was released that their missile batteries had been hacked.
The main theory that Crowdstrike based their Russian narrative on was completely blown out of the water by the Ukranians. A fact that keeps being overlooked in all of this.
Yes great post.
I was pointing this out on a thread last week.
Now remember, the DNC and media have made the idea that Russia hacked the DNC be one of the biggest threats to our elections ever.
Yet they refused to allow even the FBI to look at their servers! This is unbelievable!
Instead they allow a private firm that has connections to the DNC to be the only ones to have access, and all "17 intelligence agencies" made their minds up based on crowdstrikes findings.
Crowdstrike goes on and on about how the Russian hackers are some of the most sophisticated ever, yat they say they were able to almost immediately identify them because they used the same signatures as other hacks such as in Germany and the Ukraine.
Only they were wrong about Ukraine.
And we now know from wikileaks that the US created programs to allow hackers to frame other state actors by making a hack look like their signature, and we know that these tolls have fallen into the hands of others.
Yet Crowdstrike would have us believe that the worlds foremost superhackers just didn't think of disguising who they were.
None of this makes any sense.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
HA Goodman mentioned bull#mans Rich's saga and it is worth watching
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
HA Goodman mentioned bull#mans Rich's saga and it is worth watching
Did she say, "the TWO that killed him?" So, when they made this video, they had info that it was two individuals.
originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
a reply to: xuenchen
мат!
игра закончена
отлично сработано
15i.) Language: The dominant language of our users and moderation staff is English. In order to promote a smooth-running environment and fair enforcement of the Terms and Conditions of Use (and the Terms and Conditions of Membership), you agree not to Post or chat in any language other than English.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: D8Tee
Strange Tweet from Dmitri Alperovitch Co-Founder & CTO at CrowdStrike; Senior Fellow at Atlantic Council. From last September.
Tweet
originally posted by: queenofswords
Dmitri Alperovitch - the one that started the whole idea that the Russians wanted to use the leaked files to manipulate U. S. voters. He was also the one that contacted The Washington Post.
Dmitri Alperovitch - wife is Phyllis Schneck, deputy under-secretary for cybsersecurity and communications at the Department of Homeland Security. (Or, she was in Nov. 2016...I'm not sure she still has that position.
Alperovitch studied computer science at Georgia Tech and went on to work at an antispam software firm. There he met a striking dark-haired computer geek named Phyllis Schneck. As a teenager, Schneck once showed her father that she could hack into the company where he worked as an engineer. Appalled, Dr. Schneck made his daughter promise never to do something like that again.
To better understand his adversaries, Alperovitch posed as a Russian gangster on spam discussion forums, an experience he wrote up in a series of reports. One day he returned from lunch to a voice mail telling him to call the FBI immediately. He was terrified. "I was not a citizen yet," he told me.