It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: D8Tee
No. It is common knowledge that you conservatives don't want to believe that the Russians hacked the DNC. It isn't common knowledge that isn't true. Don't confuse your personal echo chambers for what the national opinion is. Furthermore, Mueller and co. are investigating the Russian connection whether you like it or not.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: D8Tee
No. It is common knowledge that you conservatives don't want to believe that the Russians hacked the DNC. It isn't common knowledge that isn't true. Don't confuse your personal echo chambers for what the national opinion is. Furthermore, Mueller and co. are investigating the Russian connection whether you like it or not.
Why would anyone believe that the Russians hacked the DNC?
Where's the proof?
Here's your chance to shine Krazysh0t.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: D8Tee
No. It is common knowledge that you conservatives don't want to believe that the Russians hacked the DNC. It isn't common knowledge that isn't true. Don't confuse your personal echo chambers for what the national opinion is. Furthermore, Mueller and co. are investigating the Russian connection whether you like it or not.
Why would anyone believe that the Russians hacked the DNC?
Where's the proof?
Here's your chance to shine Krazysh0t.
Shine? I've posted the Crowdstrike proof before in other threads when they ask for this proof. You guys just bury your heads in the sand and pretend like Crowdstrike is lying. I'm not going to bother. I already know how this song-and-dance goes. You guys aren't looking to deny ignorance. Y'all are just trying to get me to slip up so you can all pounce on me and troll me.
It was an explosive conclusion which cast a pall over the entire election: that the Kremlin was behind a hack of the Democratic National Committee which resulted in its embarrassing secrets being published.
First made in June 2016, it has overshadowed the election, transition and now presidency of Donald Trump.
And the FBI, CIA, NSA and 12 other intelligence agencies published an unprecedented joint report saying the Vladimir Putin ordered a hacking campaign to tip the election against Hillary Clinton.
But now the first expert company to make a link between the DNC hacks and the Kremlin is facing a damaging series of questions over its credibility, DailyMail.com can disclose.
Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has had to retract portions of a report supporting its allegations of Russian cyberattacks – and is also refusing to address Congress about its findings on Moscow's election hacking.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No, please post the proof here. I'd like to see what you have.
Shine? I've posted the Crowdstrike proof before in other threads when they ask for this proof.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: D8Tee
No. It is common knowledge that you conservatives don't want to believe that the Russians hacked the DNC. It isn't common knowledge that isn't true. Don't confuse your personal echo chambers for what the national opinion is. Furthermore, Mueller and co. are investigating the Russian connection whether you like it or not.
Why would anyone believe that the Russians hacked the DNC?
Where's the proof?
Here's your chance to shine Krazysh0t.
Shine? I've posted the Crowdstrike proof before in other threads when they ask for this proof. You guys just bury your heads in the sand and pretend like Crowdstrike is lying. I'm not going to bother. I already know how this song-and-dance goes. You guys aren't looking to deny ignorance. Y'all are just trying to get me to slip up so you can all pounce on me and troll me.
It was an explosive conclusion which cast a pall over the entire election: that the Kremlin was behind a hack of the Democratic National Committee which resulted in its embarrassing secrets being published.
First made in June 2016, it has overshadowed the election, transition and now presidency of Donald Trump.
And the FBI, CIA, NSA and 12 other intelligence agencies published an unprecedented joint report saying the Vladimir Putin ordered a hacking campaign to tip the election against Hillary Clinton.
But now the first expert company to make a link between the DNC hacks and the Kremlin is facing a damaging series of questions over its credibility, DailyMail.com can disclose.
Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has had to retract portions of a report supporting its allegations of Russian cyberattacks – and is also refusing to address Congress about its findings on Moscow's election hacking.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No, please post the proof here. I'd like to see what you have.
Shine? I've posted the Crowdstrike proof before in other threads when they ask for this proof.
www.google.com. Type crowdstrike DNC into the web bar and do your own research. I'm not acquiescing to people's demands like this. If you cared to look for the evidence and review it, you would have done so already.
Even more troubling than the media malfeasance about the discredited Crowdstrike report, in testimony in front of the Senate intelligence committee on January 10 – four days after the Ukrainian DOD denied Crowdstrike’s report — Director Comey admitted that the FBI had been denied access to the DNC servers and praised Crowdstrike, without mentioning that they worked for the DNC or that their recent report had been debunked.
any reason you are ignoring that info?
originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Just tried
Still nada
Sources say
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No, please post the proof here. I'd like to see what you have.
Shine? I've posted the Crowdstrike proof before in other threads when they ask for this proof.
www.google.com. Type crowdstrike DNC into the web bar and do your own research. I'm not acquiescing to people's demands like this. If you cared to look for the evidence and review it, you would have done so already.
Burying your head in the sand won't work Krazysh0t, Crowdsource is walking back what you took to believe as proof. You've been trolled by Crowdstrike and you fell for it hahaa.
WASHINGTON —
An influential British think tank and Ukraine’s military are disputing a report that the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has used to buttress its claims of Russian hacking in the presidential election.
The CrowdStrike report, released in December, asserted that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s war with Russian-backed separatists.
But the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) told VOA that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense also has claimed combat losses and hacking never happened.
A CrowdStrike spokesperson told VOA that it stands by its findings, which, they say, "have been confirmed by others in the cybersecurity community.”
The challenges to CrowdStrike’s credibility are significant because the firm was the first to link last year’s hacks of Democratic Party computers to Russian actors, and because CrowdStrike co-founder Dimiti Alperovitch has trumpeted its Ukraine report as more evidence of Russian election tampering.
Alperovitch has said that variants of the same software were used in both hacks.
In a January post on LinkedIn, Carr called CrowdStrike’s evidence in the Ukraine “flimsy.” He told VOA in an interview that CrowdStrike mistakenly assumed that the X-Agent malware employed in the hacks was a reliable fingerprint for Russian actors.
“We now know that’s false,” he said, “and that the source code has been obtained by others outside of Russia."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xcathdra
Again all that is doing is retracting Crowdstrike's Ukraine proclamations. You aren't proving anything that you didn't already prove. I get it, you want to use that so you can casually dismiss the Russia link without putting thought into the actual allegations and leaks surfacing.