It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Throes
Another 'yes'. You realize it may go deeeep. There may be some very embarrassing hard-to-accept facts revealed about some people and institutions you have held in the highest esteem.
Do you still want the corruption exposed publicly?
(A group of pandas is known as an "embarrassment")
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Throes
Another 'yes'. You realize it may go deeeep. There may be some very embarrassing hard-to-accept facts revealed about some people and institutions you have held in the highest esteem.
Do you still want the corruption exposed publicly?
(A group of pandas is known as an "embarrassment")
Yes! If the impact is that great that we have to rebuild our government and re-elect the majority of our elected officials the answer is still yes.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: D8Tee
So the Russian Embassy, RT, and WikiLeaks all want you to believe it was Hillary Clinton, not the SVR. That proves it couldn't possibly have been the Russians murdering him to create a conspiracy theory firestorm.
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Throes
Another 'yes'. You realize it may go deeeep. There may be some very embarrassing hard-to-accept facts revealed about some people and institutions you have held in the highest esteem.
Do you still want the corruption exposed publicly?
(A group of pandas is known as an "embarrassment")
Yes! If the impact is that great that we have to rebuild our government and re-elect the majority of our elected officials the answer is still yes.
Sometimes Truth and Justice will not be hindered. It will march forward now, because critical mass is approaching. Stay tuned!
(A group of pandas is known as an "embarrassment")
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: D8Tee
Dmitri Alperovitch, native Russian, turned DNC "special force".
CrowdStrike, the company that the DNC allowed to "examine" their "hacked" computer system rather than the FBI.
One of the King Pin links is Soros . There is another that is in Hawaii . This vid gives all the details or most of the connections links . Its a bit of a rough production but bear with the guy and you will see . The Russian narrative started years ago ...that would explain why they cant let go of it , they have too much time and money invested in it and don't have a alternative plan B
The connection between Alperovitch and the Atlantic Council has gone largely unremarked upon, but it is relevant given that the Atlantic Council – which is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk – has been among the loudest voices calling for a new Cold War with Russia.
originally posted by: DJW001
What part of "Russia is using WikiLeaks" are you having trouble with? When Gutenberg invented the printing press, he had no way of knowing that it would be used by both Protestants and Catholics to print their propaganda. Julian Assange may have started out to provide a microphone to those fighting corruption, but it has been suborned for other puposes. He now lives in fear, and can be even more easily exploited.
originally posted by: TomLawless
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
Yes, case closed as we KNOW Crowdstrike are lied and completely discredited.
So... you are going to discard all the evidence it was the Russians because either the source is anonymous or discredited, and the rest of the evidence, though overwhelming, is merely "circumstantial." Instead, you favor a complicated theory for which there are no reliable sources and for which the "evidence" is entirely circumstantial?
I haven't discarded any evidence. There is no evidence.
If there was it would have been leaked already.
Indeed. All we have is the word of the DNC outsourced IT organisation - the same people as you well know who got busted pushing their "fancy bear" nonsense in another case.
Crowdstrike based their findings on supposed similarities in hacking procedures used to allegedly shut down Ukranian anti aircraft missiles.
The problem with that is that the Ukranians denied shortly after the report was released that their missile batteries had been hacked.
The main theory that Crowdstrike based their Russian narrative on was completely blown out of the water by the Ukranians. A fact that keeps being overlooked in all of this.
That is the Russian connection, having the DNC refuse to hand their servers over to the FBI and instead let Crowdstrike do the investigation.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: D8Tee