It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: crazyewok
But he has a point
Why should China obey the USA when the USA plays fast a loose with the rules?
This is not about China obeying the US but the UN, to which China is a member. The US is asserting freedom of navigation, both on water and in the air, as is lawful to do under international law. China is attempting to claim areas as sovereign Chinese territory when in fact it is not. Secondly this involves more than just the US and China.
There is a difference.
If China wants to continue down this road then the US should re-recognize Taiwan as an independent nation and push to have them restored to the UNSC.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: jude11
I always find it amazing it always revolves around the US. Other Pacific nations share the same view as the US and those nations are also challenging China on the issues - diplomatically, economically and militarily.
The Us is not the sole nation on this planet and they are not responsible for everything that occurs on this planet. in this case China's actions created the problem.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: crazyewok
The UN is handling it via the UN Charter.
The US, like China, is free to transit in international waters and air space. Chinese sovereignty claims are invalid and as such the US has a right to freedom of navigation, per the UN.
The US is not dictating - China is.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: jude11
I always find it amazing it always revolves around the US. Other Pacific nations share the same view as the US and those nations are also challenging China on the issues - diplomatically, economically and militarily.
The Us is not the sole nation on this planet and they are not responsible for everything that occurs on this planet. in this case China's actions created the problem.
originally posted by: pez1975
a reply to: luthier
If they do like u said and the only alternative would be automation it would add jobs in the us imo cause all the factorys are in china now companys would retool build new factory's here and repatriate the jobs we sent there would add jobs here it would not be a loss imo cause they would be new jobs here even if the work force is reduced from what was in china by 10 fold.
Chinese sovereignty claims are invalid
China, the Republic of China, and the People's Republic of China[edit]
Map of the South China Sea Islands, by Ministry of the Interior, ROC, 1947.
The People's Republic of China (PRC) claims all of the Spratly Islands as part of China, and has had a long naval presence in the territories.
The Republic of China (ROC), which ruled mainland China before 1949 and has been confined to Taiwan since 1949, also claims all of the Spratly Islands.
Basis for PRC's and ROC's claims
China claims to have discovered the islands in the Han Dynasty in 2 BC. The islands were claimed to have been marked on maps compiled during the time of Eastern Han dynasty and Eastern Wu (one of the Three Kingdoms). Since the Yuan dynasty in the 12th century, several islands that may be the Spratlys have been labelled as Chinese territory,[60] followed by the Ming Dynasty[61] and the Qing dynasty from the 13th to 19th Century.[62] In 1755,[62][63] archaeological surveys the remains of Chinese pottery and coins have been found in the islands and are cited as proof for the PRC claim, but they are more likely to have come from shipwrecks of passing Chinese junks.[64]
Chinese fishermen have fished around the islands since 200 BC.[34]
In the 19th century, Europeans found that Chinese fishermen from Hainan annually sojourned on the Spratly islands for part of the year, while in 1877 it was the British who launched the first modern legal claims to the Spratlys.[32][33]
When the Spratlys and Paracels were being surveyed by Germany in 1883, China issued protests against them. The 1887 Chinese-Vietnamese Boundary convention signed between France and China after the Sino-French War said that China was the owner of the Spratly and Paracel islands.[34] China sent naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers on the islands. The Qing dynasty's successor state, the Republic of China, claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan.[35]
The Spratlys and the Paracels were conquered by Japan in 1939. Japan administered the Spratlys via Taiwan's jurisdiction and the Paracels via Hainan's jurisdiction.[32] The Paracels and Spratlys were handed over to Republic of China control from Japan after the 1945 surrender of Japan,[36] since the Allied powers assigned the Republic of China to receive Japanese surrenders in that area.[35]
After WW2 ended, the Republic of China was the "most active claimaint". The Republic of China then garrisoned Itu Aba (Taiping) island in 1946 and posted Chinese flags and markers on it along with Woody island in the Paracels, France tried, but failed to make them leave Woody island.[32] The aim of the Republic of China was to block the French claims.[35][37] The Republic of China drew up the map showing the U shaped claim on the entire South China Sea, showing the Spratly and Paracels in Chinese territory, in 1947.[35]
Taiwan's garrison from 1946–1950 and 1956-now on Itu Aba represents an "effective occuption" of the Spratlys.[39][40]
from wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: pez1975
a reply to: luthier
they build the automartion and will still need people to run the machines keep them running managment and all the other stuff that comes along with it trucking jobs to move the stuff rail jobs also tax revenues collected and engery use that will create jobs its alot of the jobs u dont see that would come with this route and they would all be high paying jobs just less of them but we have zero jobs now so and repatriation would be a net plus
originally posted by: pez1975
a reply to: luthier
i dont think this is a derailment at all all this pertains to why china wants those islands they need them for expansion and the US does not want them to expand or the other countrys in the region all the other issues discussed are relevant to why this south china sea thing is happening
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: jude11
I always find it amazing it always revolves around the US. Other Pacific nations share the same view as the US and those nations are also challenging China on the issues - diplomatically, economically and militarily.
The Us is not the sole nation on this planet and they are not responsible for everything that occurs on this planet. in this case China's actions created the problem.
Well the op mentions the US and the USA has like almost every other country done some pretty #ty things as part of its foreign policy. And has a record of ignoring sovereignty and going off half cocked like a aggressive attack dog.
So dont be surprised if its put under heavy scrutiny.
China is likely in the wrong, in fact it probably is. But let the thing go through the UN and the other pacific nations first.