It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ambushrocks
...philosophy called dialectics....
Originally posted by ambushrocks
...."it is essential to not judge anything"...
Originally posted by SeeingBlue
...Is it possible that our planets are someone elses sub-atomic particles and that our sub-atomic particles are someones elses planets so to speak...?
So the cycle has to break right?
Originally posted by symmetricAvenger
....its better not to ask but understand.
Originally posted by tgidkp
this organizing principle is what is referred to as the "wave" in the wave/particle duality.
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by ambushrocks
Ill try to explain this best i can. Its not so much us watching an object that causes its behavior to change. Sub atomic particles dont know there being watched and act differently,Whats happening is when some thing is observed were putting it in one spot in time and space. Particles can be anywhere any time. Best way i can explain that is Every possibility exists until we observe it then only one can exist. Nature cheats until a particle is observed it exists as a wave form not a particle,And its the interactions of the wave forms that produce what we see as a particle. Wow this is tough to explain.
Originally posted by ambushrocks
reply to post by ChronMan
I'm trying to understand, but it's difficult since english is not my native language. I understand the duality part, but I don't understand the term refractive...
Originally posted by MattMulder
There are a lot of things we don't know about the real brain capacities. 80 to 90% is the estimation of the capacity we don't use. But what if our brain, 10% or 40 or 60% "aware" , is not even capable of figuring out what he sees/smells/hears/touch/taste because it will mix different realities into one ?
Originally posted by constantwonder
The thing ive noticed about all of these replies and must disagree with is that they make you the person the observer. . . . this is not solely the case the observer can also be another particle or a molecule or a rock or a dog or a toe nail clipping. . . the observer could be anything that would interact with the particle in question. . . please find some real physics elsewhere to brush up your info with most of what ive read here is pseudo-science hooplah like "What the Bleep" (which is not a scientificaly backed interpratation of quantum physics. So please take it with a grain of salt my friend
[edit on 12-4-2009 by constantwonder]