posted on Jul, 20 2014 @ 01:09 PM
originally posted by: wildespace
An interesting rock (geologically speaking) from Sol 690:
Colour-balanced by me:
We can clearly see different materials presenet. This rock has some characteristics of an impact melt. Another interpretation could identify it as a
conglomerate that has had one exposed face polished by many millennia of wind blown sand.
I would have hoped for some MAHLI shots, to better detail and colours, but alas there's only this one Mastcam shot.
I find these types of objects a lot more interesting and worth looking into, than the rocks or formation that look like machinery or
Nice pic, thanks. Often when I look at the Mars potentials, I wonder what they would look like with the dust dusted off by the Rover. I don't think
NASA has gone over and dusted any of the things that people are pointing out off. Even though this thread is on what is known as a conspiracy site, in
reality it's that as well as a site for people to find out and discuss in-depth (if they feel like it) any subject under the sun - and the sun too! So
if NASA doesn't know about this thread (actually, has anybody told anyone there? I haven't.), then they are missing some really good one-percent
potentials of being very interesting. They have to be seeing some of these themselves unless they are very dense or are afraid to move a crazy-idea
up-line (that 1 percent chance rule may be feasible, and not make someone look crazy - and I repeat, I never said it was a machine part - for fear of
a career demerit when the sea-shell fossil on Mars turns out to be literally mud in his or her eye.
But if someone who knows someone who's Aunt is close to the top of the Rover food-chain, please mention this thread to them and ask them to at least
think about going in and dusting a few of these what-its off? Why would you do that, and look crazy? That's where the communication link gets cut-off,
maybe nobody at NASA has any idea about this thread. So we should analyze some of these things more in-depth, I submit for disapproval, new ones, old
ones, things we've skipped over quickly in this thread to take another look at. Why should we do this? I dunno.
edit on 20-7-2014 by Aleister
because: (no reason given)