Whistle BLOWER- Secret Plot to NUKE parts of the USA Exposed!

reply to post by Pinkorchid


All Sorcha Fall reports "come from the Kremlin". It's one way to tell if it's Sorcha Fall or not. Just because it says it's from the Kremlin doesn't mean it's real.

reply to post by Bone75


Those are the rules of ATS , if I am to post a video I must use their title.
This enable other posters to search for my post or others like it , so that duplication does not occur.

reply to post by Zaphod58


ok I will now investigate Russian News for this report.

reply to post by Zaphod58


Seems they are aware of it.

The World Bank has been created for lending to developing markets and prides itself on its values and anti-corruption policies. Karen Hudes, former Chief Counsel for the World Bank for 12 years turned whistleblower, claims the organization is filled with corruption and fraud.

voiceofrussia.com...

reply to post by Pinkorchid


They're aware of the dollar value. That doesn't make the rest of what she said true.

reply to post by Adaluncatif

Why are her eyebrows in different locations?

Do you want me to take you seriously , honestly , what sort of comment was that?

reply to post by Aazadan


Here is a little more money that has gone missing , do you not think they are capable of this sort of thing?

The biggest incident revealed by the World Bank whistleblower is linked to the 900 million dollar credit that was supposed to help the poor in the Philippines, but instead was diverted to unknown entities. The money disappeared and The Philippine National Bank, which never received the money, eventually went bankrupt and had to be bailed out by the World Bank. Karen Hudes claims that the institution is corrupt from top to bottom.

voiceofrussia.com...

In 1999 Karen reported the corrupt take-over of the second largest bank in the Philippines. Lucio Tan, a crony of Joseph Estrada, then President of the Philippines, acquired stock owned by government employees in Philippines National Bank (“PNB”) valued more than 10% of PNB’s outstanding capital without disclosure, as required by Philippines securities laws. Tan owned Philippines Airlines, in default on its loans from PNB. The government of the Philippines loaned $493 million to PNB after PNB’s depositors made heavy withdrawals. $200 million of a loan from the World Bank and a $200 million loan from Japan were cancelled. Estrada was ultimately impeached, and in 2007 an anti-corruption court in the Philippines required Estrada to refund graft he had plundered. The Bank’s Country Director in the Philippines reassigned Karen when she asked him to sign a letter warning the Philippines’ government that the Bank could not disburse its loan without a waiver from the Board of Executive Directors since the loan conditionality was not met. The World Bank’s Internal Audit Department refused to correct the satisfactory evaluation of the Bank’s supervision performance or the flawed report of the Institutional Integrity Department to the Audit Committee of the Board of Executive Directors. When the Audit Committee requested an audit of internal controls over financial reporting, KPMG, the external auditors, circumscribed the scope of their audit in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.

canadafcusa.wordpress.com...

reply to post by Zaphod58


But it does show that your statement that it was a made up story and not one that came from Russia to be also untrue.

What reporting agency is real?? Please give us your solid source for information.

reply to post by intrptr


Here are some of the documents that Karen Hudes was involved in documenting:_

kahudes.net...

More information at this source:_

canadafcusa.wordpress.com...

reply to post by Pinkorchid


You are clearly not familiar with how Sorcha Faal works. She'll sprinkle her reports with actual news so when she starts claiming ridiculous things the gullible will believe her. Where are the Russian reports that validate her claim regarding a nuclear detonation?

Bedlam



Yeaaaahh, you get to address the Congress on internal security matters as a bank lawyer, because you know a lot of people who work for Governments. Her statement only convinces me more that she has a screw loose.

Skunk Baxter addresses the Joint Chiefs, but I haven't heard of him getting to tell Congress not to "go on a mass fly to a funeral".

She has all the believability of, say, Project Camelot.

It was congress she had already addressed in 2007, about the US losing the pick of head of the world bank, (the gentleman's agreement) It was in 2007 she got booted. The gentleman's agreement ended in 2010.

She is correct about the legalese, the all caps spellings, the name and number, that being of a registered subject of the corporation from the cradle to the grave. It basically means you own nothing, you are merely a keeper at the discretion of the corporation. They still work on the loopholes that occur in that. Here in the UK, they are trying to make it a legal obligation to be on the voting register, (although they 'kindly' allow your all caps name not to be published if you don't wish it) That's a laugh, who cares when the corporation knows.

Then there are the Generals she mentioned, they got the push for unbecoming misdemeanors, that's what it said on the tin and reported as such. If they were incompetent, why not say so?

There are a lot of 'don't knows' for ordinary people, never mind any individuals like Karen Hudes who was right in there. At the very least, that limited interview in the OP, is telling everyone to go and find out much, much more for themselves.

Pinkorchid
reply to post by Aazadan

 

Here is a little more money that has gone missing , do you not think they are capable of this sort of thing?

The biggest incident revealed by the World Bank whistleblower is linked to the 900 million dollar credit that was supposed to help the poor in the Philippines, but instead was diverted to unknown entities. The money disappeared and The Philippine National Bank, which never received the money, eventually went bankrupt and had to be bailed out by the World Bank. Karen Hudes claims that the institution is corrupt from top to bottom.

voiceofrussia.com...

Do you have a credible link? Preferably not something that's Russian propaganda? Anyways, I don't think you understand the scale of the numbers being claimed. 60% of a 3.5 trillion budget is 2.1 trillion ddollars. This claim right here is for 900 million. If you converted this to a smaller scale with $210 representing 2.1 trillion the amount of money you would be claiming is missing here is 9 cents.

The pentagons missing money is the biggest story of misappropriated funds in the history of the country and that involved money being set aside for over a decade. She's claiming more than twice that amount goes missing every single year. I could believe millions being funneled to various organizations each year, and it could total over a billion (and infact we do give private banks billions each year, about 80 billion/year to the top 10 banks combined). Those values are just pocket change and accounting on them isn't very strict. What she's claiming however is downright impossible. I'm not smart enough to know how else to explain this. Government spending on a macro level is very easy to account for, and you can account for a lot of it, large percentages of the budget can't simply vanish like she is claiming. It's like saying 2+2=6 but we're taught it equals 4 because 1/3 of the value is siphoned off.

smurfy
It basically means you own nothing, you are merely a keeper at the discretion of the corporation.

There is a grain of truth to this. If you've ever looked at the EULA's of modern pieces of hardware they pretty much state you've purchased a license to use the item, but the item itself still belongs to the corporation. Which makes it illegal for you to modify your item. This has been increasing in frequency for the past few years.

reply to post by Bone75

Mr. Pieter Stek, then Executive Director for the Netherlands, and Chair of the Board Committee on Development Effectiveness, said:

“In a multilateral institution which should be governed by the rule of law and high standards of probity the charge of concealment from the Board of Executive Directors of information relevant to the exercise of its duty of supervising management and the persecution of the person who brings this to light is extremely serious. If correct, which I believe, this poisonous cocktail undermines good governance and ultimately the effectiveness of the Bank in fulfilling its mandate. I shall continue to assist Ms. Hudes in her efforts to have due process brought to bear, preferably by the Bank itself, on these issues of governance.”

Well Pieter Stek seems to be in support of her statements.

PIETER STEK
Advisory Council Member
Pieter Stek has held the position of Executive Director at The World Bank since 1996. His oversight responsibilities include the countries of Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Georgia, Israel, Macedonia, Moldova, The Netherlands, Romania, and Ukraine. From 1978-1996, Mr. Stek held positions in the Ministry of Finance of The Netherlands, first as Director of Domestic Monetary Affairs and then as Director of Foreign Financial Relations. Before joining the ministry, Mr. Stek held various positions at De Nederlandsche Bank, mainly in International Affairs and in research.

canadafcusa.wordpress.com...

reply to post by Pinkorchid


I said that the nuclear weapon off Charleston is untrue. That's a Sorcha Faal story. Nice try though.

reply to post by Xcalibur254


Well lets go see, if it was up to your standard of investigation , we should have shut the door before the first post was up........... along the lines of nothing to see here move along. Too much is being pushed under the carpet because of the first knee jerk reactions to information , too little actual research is going on to either disprove it or validate any claim made.

reply to post by Zaphod58


ok now disprove the banking claims.

reply to post by Pinkorchid


I have no intention of trying to. I don't know enough about it to try. Although as someone else pointed out it would be pretty easy to show that 100% of the US money every year was going missing.

reply to post by Pinkorchid


So then you have proof that a nuke was detonated off the coast of South Carolina? Or that 100% of all taxes are going to foreign interests? Or that the woman in the OP is who she even claims to be? Because so far no one has actually presented anything that supports the meat, and more fanciful elements, of the story presented.

reply to post by Zaphod58


Well its also here as well and this one didn't come from SF:-

A shocking new Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that President Barack Obama, while in a rage, ousted four of the United States top ranking military officers after they refused to detonate a nuclear device “in/near” Charleston, South Carolina this past week and, instead, exploded it off the Atlantic Coast.
According to this report, Strategic Missile Forces Command (SMF) notified both President Putin and the General Staff this past Tuesday (8 October) that at 01:58:11 GMT/UTC an atomic device was exploded in the seabed off the US Atlantic Ocean, barely 1,000 km (620 miles) from Charleston, causing a 4.5 magnitude earthquake measurement that SMF experts equate to being a 1-kiloton yield, which is equal to the power of 1,000 tons of TNT.

This report notes that SMF experts are able in differentiate an earthquake from an atomic blast in that in the former the ground starts shaking slowly as plates slide against each other, and then the seismic activity slow picks up as the ground really starts to move. In an atomic explosion scenario, however, the initial blast is extremely powerful, and the subsequent shaking of the ground grows progressively less severe as was the case with the 8 October blast.

The particular atomic device used, this report continues, was a B61-11 Nuclear Bomb Low-Yield Earth-Penetrating Nuclear Weapon, otherwise known as a “mini nuke” which was deployed by the Clinton administration in the post-Cold-War era, but had been rejected for deployment by Presidents Carter, Reagan, and Bush.
Report site violation

patriotsforamerica.ning.com...:Comment:582415&xg_so urce=activity

M4.4 - Off the east coast of the United States (BETA) 2013-10-08 01:58:09 UTC

comcat.cr.usgs.gov...

reply to post by Pinkorchid


Well now you're being disingenuous. I mean, what you just posted quotes word for word from the Sorcha Faal article. Here is what you quoted earlier:

A shocking new Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that President Barack Obama, while in a rage, ousted four of the United States top ranking military officers after they refused to detonate a nuclear device “in/near” Charleston, South Carolina this past week and, instead, exploded it off the Atlantic Coast.

Notice how it's the exact same thing as the first few lines of what you just posted.