It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by michaelbrux
i've had enough contact with the police to feel confident that they operate well within the confines of the law. whether it be city cops, county sheriffs or CO's at the state correctional facilities.
Same with me. The Federals, on the other hand, are running amuck with power, and are making arbitrary rules that affect local people. Like, not allowing farmers to draw water from thier own wells or local rivers and canals. Would you prefer to have those trusty law enforcement people enforcing laws or rules established by folks far away that don't listen to you, or would you have them enforcing laws that were minted locally and with the will of The People?
Sheriffs, when the supreme law of the region, will enforce laws in accordance with the will of those who elected them. This all stems from the destruction of local farmers due to unrealistic inforcement of Unconstitutional laws by Federal agencies.
Do you wish to have no legal recourse to unconstitutional laws or rules?
May your chains bear lightly upon your wrists.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
reply to post by LifeIsPeculiar
sheriffs are nothing special. their states are swamped with debt and every government in this land is little more than a debtor in possession.
maybe they should be having a meeting to figure out how they are going to pay back all that money they borrowed.
Originally posted by haarvik
Most people seem to forget that each state has it's own constitution. If that state's constitution gives the sheriff ultimate power in his jurisdiction, then he is the ultimate power for said county. Federal government or not.
End of story, no discussion, no misinterpretation.
The problem is that the federal government, who's authority should not override states authority, is doing just that.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
reply to post by haarvik
most people also forget, that the People, in this case, Americans, are exalted above all things in Heaven and on Earth in this Land.
So, it makes little difference.
the only people that will ever control anything in this land are the Americans.
not people that came here 200 years ago or yesterday; but Americans only. all the rest of your effort was in vain.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
reply to post by michaelbrux
Liberty is not "bull crap". I'm all for the Federal Government stepping in and FREEING people from oppression, and adding MORE liberty to people, but when a state decides to add liberty, and the Federal Government becomes an oppressor, we have a problem.
Don't you think the people of any particular state should be able to decide how they want to live, so long as they aren't infringing on someone else's freedoms? Or, do you subscribe to the thought that we should just eliminate states, since they have no real meaning, and just let the Federal Government run everything?
I don't see that Liberty is being scaled back by the Federal Government. the Federal government has a huge footprint in Chicago and this states last two Governors are in Federal Prison for corruption, but other than that the average person barely ever sees or hears about anything like what many of you alleged they are doing.
Of course the States are useful and the Counties and the Townships and the Cities and each should stay in its place. County Sheriffs belong in the Counties and they have no authority outside of them.
What more liberty? what is it that exactly that you aren't able to do because of the Federal Government that is worth challenging them about?
gay marriage is worth civil war, now? gun laws?
Originally posted by prophetboy12
If you want autonomy then you have to stop taking federal funds for anything. Any time the Fed Gov wants to give you money there are strings attached. they then tell you want you can do and what you will do. It is as simple as that.
STOP TAKING GOV'T FUNDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by frazzle
Don't you just wish they'd get with the program and start inheriting. I hate to admit it, but I think that line might also have been dissolved in some potent koolaid. Like sugar.
We keep going along with their insanities and we'll all be drinking the koolaid sooner than later. It's insane to vote.
Originally posted by frazzle
Another thread made me think of something else a sheriff might be able to do ~ the one about "Leaked document reveals new power for multinational corporations, threatens US sovereignty."
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I'm wondering if a sheriff might also have the authority to shut down a corporation that, say for instance, had no lawful authority to be operating in the US other than unconstitutional presidential fiat, or maybe just for breaking clean air/water laws, etc.
100% in agreement
Their opinions have enslaved the planet.
But some people don't care how quickly we the people destroy the earth... as long as nobody can tell us what to do because we the people say so
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
That's what they're trying to do, but the Feds keep infringing on THEIR authority. Get it?
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Lack of immigration enforcement and reluctance to protect the NATION'S borders. The Feds arresting people using a substance that THE PEOPLE of the State deemed LEGAL. Suing Stages and County Sheriff's for trying to uphold the law and protect the CITIZENS against illegal invaders. There are a couple...two of which are related.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Infringements of a person's liberty is always worth fighting for. Imagine if the Confederates had won, and black were still slaves. Now, consider a State decided it wanted to free the slaves, yet the Federal Government said, "Nope, you can't do that." Would you still tell the County Sheriff to "stay in his place"?
Originally posted by SilentKillah
Originally posted by frazzle
Another thread made me think of something else a sheriff might be able to do ~ the one about "Leaked document reveals new power for multinational corporations, threatens US sovereignty."
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I'm wondering if a sheriff might also have the authority to shut down a corporation that, say for instance, had no lawful authority to be operating in the US other than unconstitutional presidential fiat, or maybe just for breaking clean air/water laws, etc.
If it's within his county... then yes he does have authority to boot them for pollution. BUT.. a Sheriff isn't concerned... nor is he employing teams of scientists to find out if corporations are not regulating pollution correctly. The Federal government performs these tasks... and then when they step in and tell a farmer "no more water from this well because your crop watering is excessive and drying up the Colorado river" the Sheriff gets mad and calls a meeting about Federal government overstepping it's boundaries.
That was a hypothetical situation by the way... not the reason for this meeting... or is it?
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by SilentKillah
But some people don't care how quickly we the people destroy the earth... as long as nobody can tell us what to do because we the people say so
I believe that the earth belongs to the living. Not only that, I have seen almost nothing done correctly by the Feds. They are abject morons with way too much power.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Unity_99
Their opinions have enslaved the planet.
Can anyone look ahead right now and feel good about what is coming ? I fail to see how anyone could.
Sucks ! But I am not optimistic about the near future.
Originally posted by frazzle
Originally posted by SilentKillah
If it's within his county... then yes he does have authority to boot them for pollution. BUT.. a Sheriff isn't concerned... nor is he employing teams of scientists to find out if corporations are not regulating pollution correctly. The Federal government performs these tasks... and then when they step in and tell a farmer "no more water from this well because your crop watering is excessive and drying up the Colorado river" the Sheriff gets mad and calls a meeting about Federal government overstepping it's boundaries.
That was a hypothetical situation by the way... not the reason for this meeting... or is it?
It is not within a sheriff's duty to hire scientists to test water, however this is a case of problem, reaction, solution. Can you remember back when county extension specialists were responsible for dealing with the quality of food and water? Probably not. But these folks were experts in animal husbandry, healthy crops and water quality and chickens didn't have to have their beaks cut off so they couldn't peck themselves to death while being confined to a space no bigger than the damned chicken while being fattened up for KFC. But these specialists weren't federal, you see, and the feds wanted a way to "intervene". They not only found a way, they found a lot of supporters among city dwellers who know nothing about caring for the land.
The problem with Colorado water supply has more to do with farmers being driven off their land over many decades, which was then taken over by the big agra corps who grow your delicious genetically altered corn and e coli lickin' chicken etc. and dump toxic sludge from fertrilizers into the rivers. Oooooh, we've gotta have some more federal oversight, dontchasee. So all those former farmers and rural folks were driven into cities like Phoenix where all the water is used on golf courses and in swimming pools and then people cry, "OMG there isn't enough water to grow the foods we eat".
We have met the enemy and he is us.