It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
the only error is Obama being president....
Whichever candididate we would have gotten, we might very well be having the same argument!
Originally posted by Jedimind
the "fact checking error" persisted for sixteen years, through at least three different versions of Jane Dystel's website, and through at least four different versions of Obama's biography. - Breitbart.com, breitbartnews
If anyone could explain to me how this can be explained away I'd love to hear it. I will not accept that Obama hadn't once seen it over an entire 16 years.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Screwed
You do know Kenya didn't exist when Obama was born....right???
You "believe" its a mistake. I "believe" its a lie. Can you find me anymore mistakes,this women has made,in the SAME booklet ?
Originally posted by Screwed
I would simply say that it is getting rather fishy as more and more EVIDENCE is coming out which would suggest that he was born elsewhere.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
I believe that nothing will change you're mind, because clearly you're biased.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
of course, because if you took it for truth, you wouldn't be able to hang onto the delusion that Obama cannot qualify for a second term.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
You mean Paul is guilty of writing those articles? Not merely held accountable? Because those can be two different things.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Sure you are, being an registered indepedent doesn't automatically make you impartial or neutral on political issues. Most far right folk I've come across don't consider themselves Republican because it isn't far right enough for them. You don't have to explain yourself in this to me.
Originally posted by Partygirl
Originally posted by Resurected
Its laughable that you all use brietbart as a legit source for information IMO..
The woman who edited the book already aditted its her work.She says it is a mistake, but she at least admits its a fact that this material exists.
Do you consider Harvard University "laughable"? How about the NY times, Wall Street Journal? None of them are denying the existence of this artifact.
Kneejerk rejection to any given source is pure ignorance, nothing less. Must be warm and cozy in that ostritch-hole you've got your head in...
Originally posted by Resurected
reply to post by sonnny1
You have your own opinion spelled out for who Obama is.. Why is that a mystery to you?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
the only error is Obama being president....
Yes, some people just cannot stand the fact that Obama is the legal POTUS, and will make any excuse for him being elected, like he was elected in "error"!
Originally posted by Resurected
reply to post by sonnny1
Fact like the birther facts we have today?
Originally posted by Resurected
reply to post by sonnny1
Go on go on!
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Well, heck.
This is going to take something big to distract people. Like maybe Chicago blowing up.
What's going on this weekend in Chicago, anything?
p.s. This IS a conspiracy forum, right?