It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by metalholic
Originally posted by omegacorps
we know what harrp dose. ( what we are told ) but the side effects are unclear.
Certain advanced nations have been purposefully tampering with the atmosphere for some time now. Half a century ago their method of choice was the use of atomic weapons (4), but since then their arsenal has grown in sophistication to include the 'injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams'. In a 1996 US Air Force review of the subject, it was emphasized that 'many techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated experimentally' (5).
lofi.forum.physorg.com...edit on 4-3-2012 by omegacorps because: (no reason given)
Well if we know what HAARP does why do we still have government officials proclaiming it doesn't exist.
Why do we have other members on here chadwickus,phage proclaiming neither HAARP nor Chem-Trails exist.
I remember arguing with phage in another thread about how HAARP could be used in warfare as how can it be proved that someone attacked you with a earthquake or hurricane.
And that's your response for something as serious as weather control warfare? Never mind the side effects on the planet and the people it could be used for for beneficiary reasons huh?
cloud seeding = chemtrails
any dumping of any chemical into the atmosphere is chem-trails.
your planes can and WILL be used for nefarious purposes as ANY OTHER DAM THING.
Originally posted by guavas
Maybe this could be the reason that the "nuts" think it does those things.
Please note the DoD source.
The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by GrinchNoMore
Huh??
your planes can and WILL be used for nefarious purposes as ANY OTHER DAM THING.
Jet airliners are being used for "nefarious purposes"?? Got the evidence for that claim??
Do you even have a definition, at all, for "nefarious purposes"? Or, are you just blowing smoke?
Speculation: Military possibly
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by mojo2012
I specifically asked the other member to address the "nefarious purposes" posed by commercial jet airliners. Your response?:
Speculation: Military possibly
OK. Well away from the original need for clarification request....so, now the onus is on you, as you seem to have taken up the mantle:
Proof?
Evidence?
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by metalholic
I have to ask, did you actually watch the last two videos? Did you listen to what was said?
This was a program talking about the conspiracy angle to Haarp. There was no proof given, only opinions.
Much like most of the chemtrail threads.
I like conspiracies too, and I enjoy these kinds of programs, but they are entertainment. Watch the ones on Nessie, and Bigfoot, and Champ. They all have very interesting theories, and they try to bring as much evidence as they can, but in reality, if they had any real evidence, it would no longer be a theory, it would be a fact.
None of that is to say Haarp cannot be what you claimed it to be, only that your video's have come no closer to proving anything than has been done int he past.
Chemtrails are the result of paranoia. The fear of clouds has gotten so bad that people actually think they are being sprayed on a daily basis. This kind of fear is very unhealthy. And it's pitifully sad that so much information exists to explain contrails and weather, yet the fear mongers refuse to accept it. It's science and not up for debate.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why do chemtrail believers have such a hard time understanding what proof and evidence is?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by metalholic
Start at 1:50 and watch from their! News report proving chemtrails starts at 3:00 - 4:05. Reports say the toxic level of barium is more then 3 times the level set by the EPA.
But nothing is going on!
Ha ha - you've been conned....well not actually conned...but are the victim of an error by the reporter.
the level isn't actually 3 times he EPA limit at all - it is only 1/30th the limit, as explained here - micrograms per litre, as per the lab report shown, are parts per billion in a litre (which is 1000 millilitres of course) - the EPA limit is 2 parts per million - which is 2000 parts per billion - so the reported level of about 68 micro-grams per litre is only about 1/30th of that.
And here's how that strontium barium niobate (SBN) hologram will work..maybe...I'd be interested in how you think this relates to chemtrails, since of course SBN is there as a fairly sizeable crystal -
(page 5)
The dimensions of the photorefractive storage crystal used in this study were 20 x 20 x 1.3 mm.
Originally posted by metalholic
contrailscience.com...
Your source is another forum. Therefore Source busted!