It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
Research Experimental Evolution. Ever since mankind decided to grow plants and domesticate animals, evolution has been proven to a degree. Look at the difference between a boar and a domesticated pig. Same animal, but over many generations the tusks stop growing, the hair shortens, the mind changes.
The evidence mounts much heavier on the evolutionary side of the scale than it does on the creationist side, which offers zero evidence.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by Tachyeon
Correct go to a horse track or dog show and look at the breeding charts. All evolution baby.
thats called selective breeding and is not evolution. You never see a dog giving birth to a cat. Because they are apart of different kinds. You did give me a chuckle though.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by dilly1
i wasn't wise cracking! i was showing ya a cool thing, which you don't think is a cool thing!
who woulda thunk it! if black holes can be super massive, so can white holes and wormholes.
Originally posted by Tachyeon
What gets me is how the bible thumpers never take a history class. They original Christian bible was put together from 1000s of other books at the Council of Nicaea, then poorly translated by King James and company. I mean hell if the thumpers wanted a clue you would think they would use the original hebrew bible.
Misconceptions:
The Biblical Canon
Main article: Development of the Christian Biblical canon
A number of erroneous views have been stated regarding the council's role in establishing the Biblical Canon. In fact, there is no record of any discussion of the Biblical Canon at the council at all. The development of the Biblical Canon took centuries, and was nearly complete (with exceptions known as the Antilegomena) by the time the Muratorian fragment was written, perhaps as early as 150 years before the council, but more likely in the 4th century, specifically at the Council of Carthage in 397 and 419. In 331 Constantine commissioned fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople, but little else is known, though it has been speculated that this may have provided motivation for canon lists. In Jerome's Prologue to Judith he claims that the Book of Judith was "found by the Nicene Council to have been counted among the number of the Sacred Scriptures".
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
Exactly they are off the same kind (wolf). No evolution to be found there.
Think about it for a minute. A wolf does not produce a cat or a frog or a buffalo. All those breeds you mentioned are of the same "Dog kind".edit on 30-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dilly1
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
Exactly they are off the same kind (wolf). No evolution to be found there.
Think about it for a minute. A wolf does not produce a cat or a frog or a buffalo. All those breeds you mentioned are of the same "Dog kind".edit on 30-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)
All dogs are descendants of the wolf. ALL
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by Tachyeon
Correct go to a horse track or dog show and look at the breeding charts. All evolution baby.
thats called selective breeding and is not evolution. You never see a dog giving birth to a cat. Because they are apart of different kinds. You did give me a chuckle though.
Every breed of dog on Earth can traced back to Wolves using DNA.
Think about that for a minute. Labs, Huskies, Dalmations, Great Danes, Beagles, and Chihuahuas all come from the same animal. Selective breeding?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by Tachyeon
Correct go to a horse track or dog show and look at the breeding charts. All evolution baby.
thats called selective breeding and is not evolution. You never see a dog giving birth to a cat. Because they are apart of different kinds. You did give me a chuckle though.
But to correct you on your last statement. Black or super holes are theoretical.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
What do you think evolution is? If you think it's just spontaneous changes, then you're wrong, though that does happen too. link
Evolution comes from mutations, passed genetically from parent to offspring, and on and on, over thousands if not millions of years, depending on the environment.
A dog gives birth to a smaller dog, which then gives birth to an equally small dog. Pretty soon we have a smaller race of the same dog that, if bred with a large dog, will carry a 50/50 chance of passing on said small gene.
This newly small race of dogs moves to a new area to follow a food supply. The environment is colder here. Within 10 generations we begin to see hair getting longer and longer in the puppies being born. These long haired dogs breed with a short haired dog, and there's a 50/50 chance that dog will have long hair. Since the chances of the longer haired dogs are better in the cold climate, the long haired dogs become the dominate species.
That's how evolution works. Fair skinned people is a sign of evolution. So are colored eyes. These are mutations, which have led to new species of humans in the world. We are interbreedable, like dogs, but we are genetically different.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Maybe this is what he was hoping to happen:
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Tachyeon
What gets me is how the bible thumpers never take a history class. They original Christian bible was put together from 1000s of other books at the Council of Nicaea, then poorly translated by King James and company. I mean hell if the thumpers wanted a clue you would think they would use the original hebrew bible.
Wow, your history class taught you that the books of the Bible were decided at the Council of Nicea? That's interesting. My suggestion is either stop using Dan Brown books as History textbooks, or demand to be refunded your money for the credit hours you received:
Misconceptions:
The Biblical Canon
Main article: Development of the Christian Biblical canon
A number of erroneous views have been stated regarding the council's role in establishing the Biblical Canon. In fact, there is no record of any discussion of the Biblical Canon at the council at all. The development of the Biblical Canon took centuries, and was nearly complete (with exceptions known as the Antilegomena) by the time the Muratorian fragment was written, perhaps as early as 150 years before the council, but more likely in the 4th century, specifically at the Council of Carthage in 397 and 419. In 331 Constantine commissioned fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople, but little else is known, though it has been speculated that this may have provided motivation for canon lists. In Jerome's Prologue to Judith he claims that the Book of Judith was "found by the Nicene Council to have been counted among the number of the Sacred Scriptures".
First Council of Nicea ~ Wiki
Deny Ignorance.
edit on 30-12-2011 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)