It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by silo13
The neighbor's name is Samantha and she's been interviewed quite heavily if we're to believe what the press is putting out. Samantha was also involved in talking with the 'new' lawyer when they all me with the family. This has caused a lot of speculation.
Samantha's husband and she were having marital problems, went to a counselor, decided on some 'time apart' and her husband was not at home the night Lisa went missing.
Originally posted by Michelle129th
On his actual twitter account there is no update since the one 4 hours ago...but perhaps he facebooked it somewhere....that is incredibly disgusting to me.
Two hours of rehashing the entire verdict is unnecessary....give just 5 mins to this and other cases. God I hate the media...
Hi there. Sorry about the verdict blowing us out of the water. We'll be in tomorrow for sure with even more details. Just to be clear everything I will be reporting is info the police have so we definitely aren't impeding the investigation or anything like that. Hope everyone can hang in for one more day!
@jimspellmancnn jim spellman RE: search Saturday. Edith tells me they found baby clothes that looked like what Lisa was wearing in the shot of her at the door... 9 minutes ago via web
@jimspellmancnn jim spellman But Edith says DB came and checked and those clothes were still in the house. That's all per Edith, who organized the search.
@jimspellmancnn jim spellman Lots more tomorrow: Info on some new figures ( you guys have been very patient about this) plus troubling comments from a local DAs office.
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by Michelle129th
I think we just got ROOKED. Also I wonder if Jim Spellman IS the Justice person who wrote that fb page? Just a thought.
Originally posted by schmae
Initially I thought it had some merit. Now I don't know. But I did see a post that had a name ''is it __________?" and immediately the post was removed so I went and looked up that name. Who knows it it's true, but I thought Oh she must have guessed right because it was so immediately removed. I feel disappointed and like we were played with this whole day and what did we do with it? Spent watching HLN and waiting for something that never came? Who's the sucker?
I always think that the truth is in the detail.
Lets look at Deborah and Jeremy's comments and their television interviews. Deborah said at 1 point that they were grieving.
In my experience when you are grieving you cannot eat or sleep for sheer shock, pain and it's a deep feeling of grief inside of you.
When Deborah is speaking in front of the camera, you get tears at selected moments. She buries her head into Jeremy's shoulder, cries a little then she will compose very quickly to answer a question. This action could mean she is facing away from view to collect thoughts on her next answer. This is not an action of a person telling the truth. This action is someone thinking on their feet to keep the lie going.
Factual discrepancies of Deborah's answers. Here we have 2 distinct answers to an incredibly important aspect concerning her little daughter bedtime. A 4 hour discrepancy. Drunk or not, you know what time you put your baby to bed.
Jeremy looks totally lost, confused, doesn't know how to respond. I haven't seen him comfort Deborah much and he looks apart from Deborah. He looks down a lot as if he doesn't believe or comprehend the story unfolding before him. He has either shut down or cannot supply any information apart from his time line of entering the house and what Deborah is saying. He certainly does not look comfortable with anything, almost as if he is so frightened of saying the wrong thing.
When in an interview , when asked about the break in at the window, Deborah said yes they broke in through the window but not as noisy as the police did it. This is a very interesting comment. Here she could be diverting the truth by stating her truth was a quiet intruder, her truth is that there was no mess, no forensics, no banging or scraping through the window like the police did. She answered the question by diverting the emphasis onto the police which then stopped all other answers.
I hope I'm making some sense here because I have many things to say about Deborah's body language. Its like a window has opened up. I could be totally wrong but when I get my teeth into something I'm like a dog chewing on a bone
- Police say there is NO evidence of a break-in in the Irwin house.
- Most criminals are stupid. They’re dumber than you think. There’d be evidence someone stole a baby. ‘It’s almost impossible for the intruder to come in and not leave something’... Gloves? There’d still be evidence left behind in 99.9%.
- 34 days later they still haven’t interviewed the siblings? The parents are still not talking? ‘Ghostly intruder that levitated the baby out of the window’ and now that area is a bastion for baby’s for sale’? It’s absurd.
- I think mom god hammered, a tragedy occurred and the rest is cover-up. And don’t mistake ‘smarts for luck’. It defies all logic this case is related to an intruder.
- The police don’t tell us everything for a lot of different reasons.