It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
and what little fringe evidence that does show up,is quickly and ruthlessly snuffed out of the limelight...hmmmm...i wonder why? what could it be that tptb don't want us to know?
Originally posted by blocula
traces of what? would be left behind...unless they had glass and they probably did'nt,"nothing would remain" after a relatively short period of time... decay time of common materials link > www.greenlivingtips.com...
Originally posted by punkinworks10
Wow, pretty quiet for a thread that has had such a "lunge-parry&riposte" quality to it. So nobody's got anything to say, about how a mythical civilization could have fed itself without leaving any trace of agriculture. Nor the breeding of domesticated animal.
The lack of any large draft type animals is one reason for people of the central americas never realty advancing beyond a city state society.edit on 28-9-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
here it is hanslune. straight out of my imagination. the yucatan asteroid of 65 million years ago caused wave's 1.86 miles high.large enough to completely engulf madagascar,for example. the link > en.wikipedia.org...
and by the way " i do provide evidence" in the over 20 links that i have posted in this thread.did you even read any of them?edit on 28-9-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula
the reason's why most of humanity was destroyed again and again, in the long forgotten and distant past and why 99% of all animal life that has ever existed on earth is now extinct...is in this berkeley science lab link
Originally posted by blocula
blocula because: and what little fringe evidence that does show up,is quickly and ruthlessly snuffed out of the limelight...hmmmm...i wonder why? what could it be that tptb don't want us to know?
99% of all our structures and machines and what they are made out of,are very,very temporary,just like we are...like it or not it's the truth and it's in the above link
what first comes to my mind is atlantis and this link, based on some of the over 20,000! psychic in-trance readings of edgar cayce, as he graphically explained with great detail how the atlanteans lived and the kinds of technology they posessed > www.shellac.org...
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
blocula, give me an idea of how advanced you are suggesting. something akin to current times ? 1950's ? 1900 ? 1800 ?
one group of people say the skeletons are faked or not really that old...and another group says that they are real and they are that old...aggrevating as all hell !!!...the arguing and diversionary tactics go on and on and on." i'm right and he's wrong"...no..." he's wrong and i'm right"...it's... those who support the current belief structure, vs ,those that disagree with the current belief structure...makes my mind spin and my head hurt...who's to say who's right and who's wrong.we were'nt there when the skeletons were found...
Originally posted by drivers1492
reply to post by blocula
You are are referring to the moab man here. Let me link a christian website to show how again you are accepting information as fact that is known to be a lie.
www.answersincreation.org...
Dude I know you want things like this to be true or you seem to feel that everything about our ancient history is tainted for some nefarious reason but please, please, please at least look at your references and their track record for out right lies and half truths.
Originally posted by blocula
and if you dig a little deeper, you'll find out that the guy,glen kuban,who tried to discredit the age of the skeletons in the link you provided above, goes out of his way to try and discredit a lot of other fringe evidence as well > www.objectiveness.com...
Originally posted by blocula
what first comes to my mind is atlantis and this link, based on some of the over 20,000! psychic in-trance readings of edgar cayce, as he graphically explained with great detail how the atlanteans lived and the kinds of technology they posessed > www.shellac.org...
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
blocula, give me an idea of how advanced you are suggesting. something akin to current times ? 1950's ? 1900 ? 1800 ?
edit on 29-9-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
he has to discredit the truth, or his bosses won't sign his paychecks anymore...
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by blocula
and if you dig a little deeper, you'll find out that the guy,glen kuban,who tried to discredit the age of the skeletons in the link you provided above, goes out of his way to try and discredit a lot of other fringe evidence as well > www.objectiveness.com...
And we are eternally grateful to him for it, assuming he does this.
However, your link is to a webpage devoted to discrediting what Kuban wrote concerning one thing only, modern pterosaurs, and seems to think that if such things are real, then geology would be turned on its head, which is just an idiotic thing to say, given that geology has nothing to do with biology, for the most part.
So, where are the "lot of other fringe evidence" that Kuban discredits? I'd like to use him as a source.
Harte
Originally posted by blocula
he has to discredit the truth, or his bosses won't sign his paychecks anymore...
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by blocula
and if you dig a little deeper, you'll find out that the guy,glen kuban,who tried to discredit the age of the skeletons in the link you provided above, goes out of his way to try and discredit a lot of other fringe evidence as well > www.objectiveness.com...
And we are eternally grateful to him for it, assuming he does this.
However, your link is to a webpage devoted to discrediting what Kuban wrote concerning one thing only, modern pterosaurs, and seems to think that if such things are real, then geology would be turned on its head, which is just an idiotic thing to say, given that geology has nothing to do with biology, for the most part.
So, where are the "lot of other fringe evidence" that Kuban discredits? I'd like to use him as a source.
Harte
why did we go to the moon? what's the real reason? and did we stop going,or did they just stop telling everyone about it? were we warned away?
Originally posted by piotrburz
If there were another civilizations before our civilization, why there aren't any satellites or traces of moon landings?