It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Reality is, he was tackled while he still had the hot gun in his hands and he's guilty.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The real question will be ... is he culpable?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Guilty .. yes. Culpable? Dunno'.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Of course they do, but that is why we have a legal system, everyone's rights are supposed to be represented. However, we the public are not going to see any justice being done in this case, because nothing is what we think it is. I don't look at most of the crimes that make it to the national news, as being straight forward.
Originally posted by Shoomoo
I always thought multiple witnesses would have counted as evidence, but these days I am not so sure.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I am pretty sure he may be guilty, but there are a lot of stuff that I do not know about yet.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Who knows, maybe he may win because of due process, or with the insanity defense?
Originally posted by PlautusSatire
People don't turn their face away from a gun when you point it at them, they watch the gun, and put their hands in front of their faces.
Originally posted by whyamIhere
My brain hurts after reading all this...
Yes he deserves a trial. Yes he has his rights. Not everything is a conspiracy. We had better learn to come together in this Country. The times ahead are going to demand it. We will never really know what drives a crazy person. However, to hinge on his ever written word like he is some kind of "Cunning Linguist" (sorry I always wanted to use those words in a meaningful sentence). I just do not see it. He's 22 years old. I got socks older than that.
Originally posted by MisterCrowley
reply to post by Resurrectio
Is it the shooters fault a 9 y/o got shot? NO it is who ever was watching her for not protecting her! I bet the little 9 y/o girl was used to deflect the bullets.. .
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by xX aFTeRm4Th Xx
You mean conflicting eye witness accounts, for one of them talks about the dark hooded gunman running off.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by NorEaster
I have to assume that he is not that callous or stupid, and is only trying to get me to snap on him.. I really believe that nobody can be that ignorant and pathetic at the same time.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Originally posted by MisterCrowley
reply to post by Resurrectio
Is it the shooters fault a 9 y/o got shot? NO it is who ever was watching her for not protecting her! I bet the little 9 y/o girl was used to deflect the bullets.. .
You are a dumbass. Possibly the biggest dumbass on this entire site.
Current ranking is 1.) You
2.) You
3.) You
4.) the cinic
Also I welcome the warning. This guy is an asshole.
Yeah it is the shooters fault. Were you there? Wouldn't you assume this happened pretty fast? How could someone protect anyone really in a situation like this? Since you are so into conjecture what if one of the other victims was trying to protect her.