It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 35
203
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by XPLodER
i wounder if i can get you to promise a retraction if you are shown to be wrong?
i sure will retract my statements of support for wiki if the NWO thing pans out
will you offer a "i was wrong thread" if latter on down the track
wiki is shown to do public good?

I most certainly will post a retraction
if certain conditions are met.

1) wikileaks is PROVED not to be any clandestine agency
or US Federal Agency Operation, NWO or
Bildeberg Group or George Soros foundations funded entity.

2) the NWO or bankers are PROVEN not to use the fall of
America as a means to take over our sovereignty OR
crash the dollar.

If the above conditions are met, then yes I will
retract my comments.




posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 09:08 PM
link   
Boon if this is considered off topic to the thread just let me know, but seeing as this thread has been stuck on stupid for numerous pages now (no offense to anyone here) I want to ask this question. Wikileaks has been in possession of all these cables for some time now correct? Why wait till right now to do the release? I think the timing is of importance and something that needs further thought. I mean if they are dribbling out cables as slow as they are they could very well have started weeks if not months ago correct? So what else is going on in the world where this is going to benefit someone somehow?



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 09:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Don't be bitter your thread went haywire, but mixing religion into this allready volatile mix was a recipe for disaster mate.

it hasn't gone haywire and I'm not bitter.
it just has a lil dead weight with ur posts.

also, I did not mix religion into this,
u did when u called Beck a religious
nutjob.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 09:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaynkeel
Wikileaks has been in possession of all these cables for some time now correct? Why wait till right now to do the release? I think the timing is of importance and something that needs further thought. I mean if they are dribbling out cables as slow as they are they could very well have started weeks if not months ago correct? So what else is going on in the world where this is going to benefit someone somehow?

WHEN (timing) is one of the things I mention
in this thread many times already.
And since the next big release is
suppose to target a bank (supposedly BOA)
so what's the connection with the current event ???



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 09:46 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 





WHEN (timing) is one of the things I mention in this thread many times already. And since the next big release is suppose to target a bank (supposedly BOA)


I realize all this I was being a bit sarcastic with this thread being stuck on "Boon don't know is arse from a hole in the ground" for the last 100 pages.
Which I do admit can make you forget things already discussed, I guess mission accomplished for the away team. But there is something else there that I can't quite put my finger on just yet, I am sure at the most inopportune time I will have an ahh haa moment and I will be able to fill in the blanks.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 10:17 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


HA! This is simply ludicrous, I'm a little worried for you boondock, you may need to get out of the house a little more, I'm serious, lack of exercise and vitamin D isn't good for you. It would also help if you took the time to spell whole words and left out the facebook speak, you don't come off as very academic.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by sir_slide
HA! This is simply ludicrous, I'm a little worried for you boondock, you may need to get out of the house a little more, I'm serious, lack of exercise and vitamin D isn't good for you. It would also help if you took the time to spell whole words and left out the facebook speak, you don't come off as very academic.

lol

and dem dang revenuers kep comin
roun hea dont lev much time fer
book lernin

an tanks fer the con-sern
edit on 12/6/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 11:25 PM
link   
John may not like the way assange runs things but he is mirroring the cables so he either believes they are real and need to be in the public domain or he is a part or the NWO, which could it be?



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 12:45 AM
link   


2 things
I have spent a large amount of time researching,


Apparently, you spent a large amount of time researching the wrong materials.


posting links, articles, videos and answering questions
in 34 pages.


Do provide. At the very least provide the page number you have proven the NWO conspiracy. Ill be happy to read it.



If u r so f'ing lazy that can't read what
I have already posted then u ain't worth the comments.


Whooooey! Testy are we? Don't like the fact someone questions your absurd notions? I like the real irony in your lazily written response though. How appropriate. A real scholar you must be with all those hours you gots into dem books...aint that right?
...or more likely and accurately conspiracy theorist NWO posting on ATS.


Try not to type like a 14 year old the next time you wish to lend credence to your arguments. Maybe you will have a real discussion with someone...maybe.



Secondly, if u think it's non-sense, then u don't need to
be on this thread. So click the red x and good bye.


One thing I thoroughly enjoy doing as a member on this website is being a voice of reason when the nutters come out of the woodworks and start spewing nonsense, just like I and others have done in your thread here. So I think I'll stick around as long as I please. And as long is the "NWO" is the basis of any thread I will continue to demand evidence for such outlandish baseless garbage. Great. Happy that is settled.




Originally posted by open_eyeballs
You still haven' replied to the fact that your percieved "blackmail" has not worked.
Hilary Clinton has stated she will no
longer hold public office after her tenure.
Looks like it's working to me


Are you aware just about every single statement you have made, at least in the last few pages, have been in complete contradiction to your OP.

Lets make this abundantly clear.

You have claimed that wikileaks work for the NWO.

Apparently you believe George Soros plays a key role in this NWO conspiracy.

George Sorros has major ties with the Democratic party.

Your assertion is that a major goal in the wikileaks is to blackmail the current world leadership (which doesnt make sense, because according to the NWO fantasy "they" are currently running the show). And if the "NWO" is running the show its simple to deduce from that kind of logic that "they" control the government of the United States as well. And now you are saying Hillary Clinton, a major figure in the Democratic Party (who is currently in control of the executive branch (and I believe the Senate still) and Secretary of State is being blackmailed by the same people that fund her?



Thank you so much. You fit into the conspiracy nutter category very well.

All banter and rhetoric aside, for the third time, Ill be happy to review any information or evidence you have in regards to the "NWO" conspiracy. If I find an ounce of truth in any of it Ill retract my comments and opinions and apologize. Im almost willing to bet you have zero. As I stated earlier most of it is contrived through political partisan rhetoric.

If you are truly interested in real world conspiracies that actually took place. Look into the British Empire and its expansion from the 16th century to the 1st world war. There you will find actual conspiracies of men wishing and having the power to rule the entire world. Good luck buddy.
edit on 7-12-2010 by open_eyeballs because: edit to fix quotations



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 01:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
You have claimed that wikileaks work for the NWO.

I think I remember saying
they were funded by George Soros
but let me go back and make def sure
so u dont blow another gasket.

correction: from the OP


Julian Assange is paid by George Soros


edit on 12/7/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 01:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Dr Cosma
 



And theres no point in quoting me or replying to me because I simply will not bother to reply, i'll read your reply if you are brave enough to respond ( which I know you are...)
But I wont give you the pleasure of my attention anymore than this comment

Normally I would reply but see no point given your stance..
Read away..



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 01:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
if you can answer just one of my questions with supportive evidence of a "NWO" conspiracy... Ill go back and read every single line of this thread and apologize.

how ironic

cuz reading this thread is where
ur gonna find the evidence.


Where?? I haven't seen any yet...
A lot of talk about Soros and a flimsy theory linking Wikileaks..

That about sums up this thread so far...
Ohh with a few conflicting posts from the OP..



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


You don't have anything to do with the 7 Seals website do you? Just wondering because they look pretty much identicle and there's alot of rubbish on that site too.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:02 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



I most certainly will post a retraction
if certain conditions are met.

1) wikileaks is PROVED not to be any clandestine agency
or US Federal Agency Operation, NWO or
Bildeberg Group or George Soros foundations funded entity.

2) the NWO or bankers are PROVEN not to use the fall of
America as a means to take over our sovereignty OR
crash the dollar.

If the above conditions are met, then yes I will
retract my comments.


No 1.. is silly..The proof should come from those that think wiki is anything other than stated..
I can't PROVE that you are NOT NWO scum..

No 2..well most already agree the Gov and Banks are parisites bleeding us dry..



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
You don't have anything to do with the 7 Seals website do you? Just wondering because they look pretty much identicle and there's alot of rubbish on that site too.

have never heard of 7seals
and u really need to learn how to spell identical.
That is a 4th-Grade level word or maybe you
didn't get that far.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by bluemirage5
You don't have anything to do with the 7 Seals website do you? Just wondering because they look pretty much identicle and there's alot of rubbish on that site too.

have never heard of 7seals
and u really need to learn how to spell identical.
That is a 4th-Grade level word or maybe you
didn't get that far.


Saving the world and still have time for spelling lessons..
How thoughtfull



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
No 1.. is silly..The proof should come from those that think wiki is anything other than stated..
I can't PROVE that you are NOT NWO scum..

No 2..well most already agree the Gov and Banks are parisites bleeding us dry..

geez, people talk about me not being
edumicated like ya'll but at least I can
spell parasites and identical


Black !!! Aren't we about outta rum yet?
It's your turn to head to the store you
know.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:17 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Black !!! Aren't we about outta rum yet?
It's your turn to head to the store you
know

And I still would


But if you wish to get all gramatical then your use of aren't was incorrect..

edit on 7-12-2010 by backinblack because: Keep teach Boon happy



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:35 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Sailor Jerry? Now were talking...



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
And I still would


But if you wish to get all gramatical then your use of aren't was incorrect..

So is your spelling of "grammatical" incorrect


I am getting thirsty, can you pour me
another glass?



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join