It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 36
203
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


True but I type fast and don't usually pull people up on typos..
Unlike you...

ice??




posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 04:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
So anyone not suporting view has nothing to do here?

not what I said

I said if u think it's nonsense
u don't need to be here.
I said nothing about supporting
views.


I think it's nonsense and it's the reason I'm here.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 04:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Don't be bitter your thread went haywire, but mixing religion into this allready volatile mix was a recipe for disaster mate.

it hasn't gone haywire and I'm not bitter.
it just has a lil dead weight with ur posts.

also, I did not mix religion into this,
u did when u called Beck a religious
nutjob.



That comment was not directed at you.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 06:39 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Got proof of that.....payslips, bank deposits blah blah???

Without proof and the evidence, you are making assumptions based upon speculation only.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   

MOD NOTE: ATTENTION!!!




Please discuss the topic and not other members.


That means no belittling, off topic posts, changing member names to make a point, casting aspersions on another's character, talking down to other members, harassing or ridiculing others.

Further such remarks can and will result in warnings and/or post removals.
In addition, further off topic detours will result in the thread being closed!!

Mod Note: Terms & Conditions Of Use – Please Review This Link.

Courtesy Is Mandatory

Ad Hominem Attacks And You

Posting Jokes, Ridiculing, Making Fun of Others in Threads...



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
Assange is NOT a hero to me when the
people funding him have ties to the NWO.


You don’t know that you only believe it. let me explain that to you and all of those who think that their beliefs should be taken as facts.

Everybody on ATS is entitled to their own opinion, if you believe in the NWO and that Assange is connected to this group then fair enough. The problem is when you try to put over your believe as being a fact which it is of course not because you don’t have any solid evidence that proves the existence of the NWO as a evil organisation seeking world domination and secondly that Assange has any meaningful connection.

That one of the biggest problems with ATS these days,, the people who have developed the paradoxical ideology that a belief can be held as absolute fact if the aforementioned belief can be articulated with a logical paradigm, even if that paradigm has no foundations in objective and accepted scientific and historical facts. If the foundation of your hypothesis for any conspiracy is evolved from your own paranoid or bias observations and assumptions then your hypothesis is going to be wrong. This is because from the outset of your research you have directed all your research in such a way as to confirm your paranoid beliefs, however in doing so you have also ignored the other side of the debate and as such your argument is no longer objective but it is rather subjective and bias. Due to the fact you have failed to look at the overwhelming evidence that points to you being wrong, there is no balance to what you have wrote.

The burden of evidence is on you to persuade us that you are right. If you cannot submit any evidence that supports your argument and is a reasonable standard then your argument is no more than your own vague paranoid ramblings. It’s not even like this is your Idea, form skimming over a few of your very bad sources it seems you have stole these ideas from other bloggers, who also have no evidence.

With that in mind you as the author of this thread has failed to inform us, the readers that in reality it is the case that Wikileaks is not part of the NWO based on looking at a balance of the evidence. Rather you have presented your paranoid and bias belief as absolute fact however this cannot be true as the terms belief and fact are oxymoronic. As such your entire thread falls to bits and can be quite reasonably demoted to the vast cyber trash can under the label “more crap”. Perhaps worse than that and something, which frankly you should be embarrassed for, you expect us to accept this based on the ideas of other bloggers.

This thread is just slightly above the thread we had yesterday about how ATS and Wikileaks were working with Satan and the NWO on the “paranoid beliefs” scale of conspiracies.

You have not exposed anything, you have only told us that you believe Assange is working with NWO. That’s fine by me, just so long as you accept that this is only your belief and a balance of the facts show that belief to be wrong.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by bluemirage5
You don't have anything to do with the 7 Seals website do you? Just wondering because they look pretty much identicle and there's alot of rubbish on that site too.

have never heard of 7seals
and u really need to learn how to spell identical.
That is a 4th-Grade level word or maybe you
didn't get that far.


If you by any chance think that all of us demanding evidence is derailing your thread as you have implied, I hereby give you the post where you actually start derailing your own thread.

And I woild also like to thank kevinunknown for getting it straight back on track, thanks mate, this was getting slightly dumb, but you raised the bar



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
 


Thank you what I wrote was only based on the OP but would find it very interesting to have him respond to what I have said.

Since writing however I have gone over some of what has been wrote and I understand what you are saying about things getting rather silly. I am not one to flame members personally but the OP has just trampled over all of my pet hates. Firstly assuming that everything is NWO and has a massive conspiracy behind it. Then using really bad sourcing, calming that his belief is a fact when in fact it is more akin to a religious ideal as opposed to a factual entity. I have also noticed that the OP never really seems to bother taking the time to write a decent response it’s just a few lines for the most part. But the thing that has really got on my wick is mocking other member’s grammar and spelling despite the content of his thread mostly contains colloquial language and abbreviations, which really does annoy me.

The OP would do well to remember this thread is not about others spelling and grammar, it is about his belief that wikileaks is working in conjunction with the NWO. Any time he deviates the core of his thread by posting yet more rubbish sources and picking on other members over their spelling and grammar he is only providing further evidence that his argument hold no Wight and he is ultimately wrong about this.

Admitting you are wrong OP is not s sign of weakness it’s a sign of strength.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by kevinunknown
 


The best answer you can expect is propably this:

Go do your own research, I have proved this allready on some undisclosed location, and if you can't find it you are not worthy of my reply.

And so the thread has deteriorated to what you can read in the last couple of pages, namecalling, playground tactics and the OP generaly acting like a spoiled child that can't have what he points at....

I guess the only reason he hasn't atacked my spelling is that I have made it clear on my profile my first language is not english....

However, I'm just not willing to let this matter rest based on the same reasons you chose to comment, it's about upholding some standards in a discussion.

I mean if anything the OP has convinced me that if what he says is true and based on fact i bloody welcome the "NWO".



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 05:18 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 08:32 PM
link   
Some real meat and potatoes for all
you nay-sayers out there.

First of all, to make this diagram work
we need to show the link between Cass
Sunstein, Barack Obama and the CIA.
So without further ado.

CIA Interpedia Project

A Brave New World
By Cass R. Sunstein
Saturday, February 24, 2007


The Central Intelligence Agency disclosed the existence of its top-secret Intellipedia project, based on Wikipedia software (and now containing more than 28,000 pages), in late October. The agency hopes to use dispersed information to reduce the risk of intelligence failures. NASA officials have adopted a wiki site to program NASA software, allowing many participants to make improvements.

In the private domain, businesses are adopting wikis to compile information about products, profits and new developments. The Autism Wiki, produced mostly by adults with autism and Asperger's syndrome, contains material on autism and related conditions. Wikileaks.org, founded by dissidents in China and other nations, plans to post secret government documents and to protect them from censorship with coded software.


www.washingtonpost.com...

In this article, Sunstein is adoring the wikileaks platform
as a model for the CIA version of the Intellipedia Project.

How does Julian Assange get recruited by the CIA?
He was facing 10 yrs in prison for hacking Nortel.
So he cut a deal to work for the CIA instead.


Digging a bit into the past of Julian Assange we find in his 20’s he is arrested for hacking the central server of the Canadian telecom company Nortel. Facing 10 years in prison he pleads guilty to 25 charges and yet he gets off with a fine. Hacker turned fed?


dailyteaparty.com...


In 1991, at the age of 20, Assange and some fellow hackers broke into the master terminal of Nortel, the Canadian telecom company. He was caught and pleaded guilty to 25 charges; six other charges were dropped. Citing Assange's "intelligent inquisitiveness," the judge sentenced him only to pay the Australian state a small sum in damages.


www.time.com...

The CIA then does a takeover of wikileaks from the
chinese hackers and inserts Assange in the lead role
as it's founder.

As you can see from the diagram Soros and Sunstein are connected
by 85 White House visits during 2009 and also through the Obama
Presidential Campaign contributions. Sunstein poses the Intellipedia
CIA Op to Obama and Obama gives him a position in the White House
as Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs. So he is directly connected to Obama. Obama and Sunstein
needs illegal funding to pull off this Op and recruits Soros as the
money man and the fall guy should they be discovered. It wipes
blame from the White House. They pitch the Op to Soros who is
onboard since the object is to target Free Speech on the internet
and eliminate Obama's competition in the next election which is
Hilary Clinton. Soros states in public that only Billionaires
should have free speech.

So the connection goes:

Wikileaks to CIA
CIA to Obama and Sunstein
Obama and Sunstein to Soros Funding through Moveon.org per the diagram
Soros to the Rothschild House



So how does this connect wikileaks to the NWO?
Through Soros ambitions prior to wikileaks origins.

Soros creates The Shadow Party, which is a replacement
for the Democratic Party. There are 3 parts to this article
linking Soros to the Shadow Party. The Shadow Party
is an elite bunch whose intent is taking over all government
and financial institutions in America. Basically a NWO.
There is too much content to post from 3 pages so I
will post all 3 links so you can read for yourself.

Shadow Party: Part 1
Shadow Party: Part 2
Shadow Party: Part 3

And since Soros has now been implicated and proved
to part of this wikileaks conspiracy, let's link him
to the Rothschild House which is the Bildeberg Group.


Soros has been identified as a front man of the Anglo-French Rothschild banking group. Understandably neither he nor the Rothschilds want this important fact to be public, so the tight links to his friends in the London "City", in the British foreign ministry, in the state of Israel and to his mighty friends in the American establishment would stay concealed."


www.rootsie.com...

And this my friends is how you can have a
hacker totally defeat the US Government's
efforts to stop him. The CIA is assisting
and Soros is funding, all with Obama's approval.

Great scheme !!!
until now



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 08:50 PM
link   
so what do we have to
talk about now??
(crickets chirping)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:08 PM
link   
so the above proof would corroborate
Glenn Beck
Gerald Celente
Webster Tarpley

and many more



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:12 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:29 PM
link   
Well it sure can't get anymore laid out in the open in my opinion, great job on the recent posts, as that is laid out pretty simply for most people to follow. While many people will hop in as usual and try to discredit some of those sources listed, still doesn't matter to me as the dots keep connecting for my personal opinion on the matter.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaynkeel
Well it sure can't get anymore laid out in the open in my opinion, great job on the recent posts, as that is laid out pretty simply for most people to follow. While many people will hop in as usual and try to discredit some of those sources listed, still doesn't matter to me as the dots keep connecting for my personal opinion on the matter.

well thank you kind sir


and star for u just to come back
and check it out and post ur response.

I thought it was well laid out too.

Maybe that will shut up the people who think
Assange is a hero.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 





Maybe that will shut up the people who think Assange is a hero.


Well to each their own everyone needs a hero right? But unfortunately it will do nothing to stop the Assange,soros, paid disinfo agents and shut them up!!!!



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 09:58 PM
link   
Oh I almost forgot check this out... Not sure why link keeps malfunctioning? I must be stuck on stupid tonight!!!




edit on 7-12-2010 by jaynkeel because: wrong link fixed


www.youtube.com...
edit on 7-12-2010 by jaynkeel because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 10:02 PM
link   
some Alex Jones videos
with Webster Tarpley
saying basically the same
thing about Soros.

www.infowars.com...



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 10:06 PM
link   

The prosecutor, however, said “there is just no evidence that there was anything other than sort of intelligent inquisitiveness and the pleasure of being able to—what’s the expression—surf through these various computers”.


www.liquida.com...

Dangerous hacker....


The only mention I can find on julian pre wikileaks is from 1999


Cryptographer Julian Assange, who moderates the online Australian discussionforum AUCRYPTO, discovered the department papers while investigating NSAcapabilities. "This is not some theoretical exercise. The US has actually builtand lab tested this technology, which is clearly aimed at telephone calls. Youdon't make a wheel like this unless you have something to put it on," he said.


www.independent.co.uk...

edit on 7-12-2010 by aivlas because: (no reason given)




The start of the plotting??????
www.mail-archive.com...
edit on 7-12-2010 by aivlas because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join