It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 33
203
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


More wikileaks bashing eh? More paranoid distractions we don’t need OP,

I really don’t understand the people who attempt to claim that there is some massive conspiracy involving wikileaks being a sub-division of the NWO I can only assumeits a desperate attenction to be different and get some attenction.

The biggest problem is that there is no real evidence (I am getting bored of saying that), the op’s evidence is what? Oh yeah that’s right people some random news articles, and a few blogs that most other people ignore due to it being rubbish.

I just cant understand why anybody would assume that wikileaks and the NWO are working together. I personally think this is the biggest thing to happen in the world of “conspiracy theory” since 9/11. Its massive.

Think about we have a genius Auzi computer hacker who has released almost half a century’s worth of secret embassy cables talking about China wanting united Korea, the Sectary of State ordering the spying of UN officials, proof the government of Yemen has been lying to its people and a whole bunch of other interesting stuff, I also hear he even has some dirt on UFO’s. Then we have his website shut down and some of his bank accounts frozen, jee they even switched of his PayPal account. Then to top it all off he’s wanted all over the world so the swiss can question him over what are in all probability faked rape allegations and he’s on the run.

He is a hero to all of us who seek the truth and deny ignorance. The real conspiracy can be found if you read the newspapers and look at the leaks, why do you have this urge to find a deeper meaning when there is no logical reasoning for it nor is there any evidence.




posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:11 PM
link   
On the topic of "sheeple"

If one goes one way and people follow they are sheep
If another goes in a different direction and people follow they are sheep
If those groups split and people follow they are also called sheep.

How can you say anyone is not a sheep.
edit on 6-12-2010 by aivlas because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by kevinunknown
He is a hero to all of us who seek the truth and deny ignorance.

Assange is NOT a hero to me when the
people funding him have ties to the NWO.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:37 PM
link   
You state that as a fact even though there is no evidence to support that. Deny ignorance



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
You state that as a fact even though there is no evidence to support that. Deny ignorance


You state that Assange is NOT NWO even though
there is no evidence to support that.
So you deny ignorance.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   
I didn't say that. Did I? As far as I remember I didn't and if I did then my bad.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 02:53 PM
link   
wait a minute, did I hear this right.
This guy says Soros is the world's #1
drug Trafficker. Ties to Colombian Drug
Cartel.



well that would corroborate this story
where Soros is warning against the
war on drugs.


The Open Society Institute of Soros has put tens of thousands of dollars into Cato for such purposes as a “lecture series” on the dangers of a war on drugs,


www.worldtribune.com...



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Maybe the whole scheme is bigger than you think and Soros is a patsy. Isnt one facet of the NWO supposed to be about one world court? Isnt that what you would need to try a person for crimes against the world?



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   

edit on 6-12-2010 by hybridkate because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by hybridkate
 

well that info lends credence that
drug motives maybe behind this
attack on US Policy and Policymakers.
Destabilize the Gov thru leaks so
the population does his work for
him is pretty smart.

Still a criminal though

so the US falls only to be
replaced by a rothschild banking
and drug cartel.

still think wikileaks is doing us a favor ???



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 03:14 PM
link   
and here is O'Reilly with his
spoof on Soros.
WHOA, did he just say Soros
funds La Raza???


edit on 12/6/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 03:41 PM
link   

John Young said he left the site in 2007 due to concerns over its finances and that WikiLeaks was engaged in the selling of documents.

"I think it is a money-making operation, no doubt," Young said of WikiLeaks.

"It follows the model of a number of other business intelligence operations. Selling intelligence information is a very lucrative field, and so they are following that model, usually cloaked in some kind of public benefit," he told Klein.

"But they are far from being the only one that does that," Young added. "It's a well-known business model.


www.wnd.com...


Asked specifically whether he was charging WikiLeaks with selling classified information and documents, Young replied, "Yes."

Klein then asked, "When you were at WikiLeaks initially, was your impression they were trying to sell information?"

Young responded, "Well, it only came up in the topic of raising $5 million the first year. That was the first red flag that I heard about. I thought that they were actually a public interest group up until then, but as soon as I heard that, I know that they were a criminal organization."


OK, so John is saying wikileaks is selling secrets.

So what would happen if Soros buys the whole lot ???

would u get a slow agonizing death of Soros' opponents
through a media full of leaked classified documents ???

Soros: Ok, I'll buy everything u got on the US.

Assange: Um, that'll run you about $10Million

Soros: No problem, but I want you to slowly
leak it out through the media platforms I give
you and target whom I say. Is this acceptable?

Assange: It's your money! You get what you want


edit on 12/6/2010 by boondock-saint because: clarifying



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 04:22 PM
link   
so 3 things to note here:

1) Wikileaks is classified as a 501(3)(c) entity
which is a non-profit organization. The reason for
this is so they do not have to supply their list
of donors or financiers on tax forms.
Untracable money.

2) Wikileaks gathering state secrets and selling
them to the highest bidder makes them criminals
as it now becomes international espionage. This
is illegal in most civilized countries.

3) Conspiracy to commit international espionage
is the acceptance of funds and the transfer of data
between partners.

Still think they are your savior ????
or your hero ????

They are common criminals !!!



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 04:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by kevinunknown
He is a hero to all of us who seek the truth and deny ignorance.

Assange is NOT a hero to me when the
people funding him have ties to the NWO.


What NWO? Who makes up the NWO? Where are "they?" What have "they" accomplished? What are their goals?

If this was some blackmailing then it obviously didn't work.

If the NWO resorts to using small websites to carrying out their "missions" and plans for world dominance
then I have absolutely no fear of them. Maybe the NWO is computer programmers with mad hacking skills...lol



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by kevinunknown
He is a hero to all of us who seek the truth and deny ignorance.

Assange is NOT a hero to me when the
people funding him have ties to the NWO.


Could you be so kind Boondock, to at least define the NWO?

What is NWO's masterplan?

Who is the NWO except Soros and Assange?

Some proofr there is a NWO?



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
What NWO? Who makes up the NWO? Where are "they?" What have "they" accomplished? What are their goals?

ummm
undoubtedly u haven't read the thread



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by PsykoOps
You state that as a fact even though there is no evidence to support that. Deny ignorance


You state that Assange is NOT NWO even though
there is no evidence to support that.
So you deny ignorance.


You make claims on what the truth is, please make a minimal effort to defend your claims.

All you have presented is a possible and likely claim that George Soros might have supported wikileaks with money, wich is the same I have done.
Obviously Soros can chip in 1,000,000$, and I can only spend a miniscule sum compared to that, but I do not get to make any decissions in the matter of how WL operates.

But, NWO(whatever that is in your mind)?!?


And just to put things into perspective, Soros spent 40,000,000$ dollars to get rid of GWB, and have propably spent a maximum of 5,000,000$ to support wikileaks....

Come on, I know it's hard to accept you are wrong, but this is getting embarrasing mate.
edit on 6-12-2010 by SkurkNilsen because: details details details



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
wait a minute, did I hear this right.
This guy says Soros is the world's #1
drug Trafficker. Ties to Colombian Drug
Cartel.



well that would corroborate this story
where Soros is warning against the
war on drugs.


The Open Society Institute of Soros has put tens of thousands of dollars into Cato for such purposes as a “lecture series” on the dangers of a war on drugs,


www.worldtribune.com...


Wait a minute, this guy Boondock is saying WL is a part of a NWO conspiracy, and he has just as much evidence as Glenn Beck on the matter


Oh, man..... Fall from grace....



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   
also a related thread on Soros
here at ATS

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
You make claims on what the truth is, please make a minimal effort to defend your claims.

And just to put things into perspective, Soros spent 40,000,000$ dollars to get rid of GWB, and have probably spent a maximum of 5,000,000$ to support wikileaks....

Come on, I know it's hard to accept you are wrong, but this is getting embarrasing mate.

lmao, thank you

u just agreed with me with ur $5M
response.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join