It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 34
203
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Some proof there is a NWO?

I find ur questions most trivial
and fruitless since every president
we have had since Bush Sr. has mentioned
the term in speeches. Dude, do your own
homework and stop trying to derail this thread
with meaningless drivel.
edit on 12/6/2010 by boondock-saint because: spelling




posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


man i never thought id say these words
boondock are you really glen beck?
cause your kinda starting to sound like him

xploder



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
You make claims on what the truth is, please make a minimal effort to defend your claims.

And just to put things into perspective, Soros spent 40,000,000$ dollars to get rid of GWB, and have probably spent a maximum of 5,000,000$ to support wikileaks....

Come on, I know it's hard to accept you are wrong, but this is getting embarrasing mate.

lmao, thank you

u just agreed with me with ur $5M
response.


I have said several times on this thread that it is not unlikely that Soros have funded WL, but how does that make it NWO?

What is NWO?

And some evidence to back up your claims.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Some proof there is a NWO?

I find ur questions most trivial
and fruitless since every president
we have had since Bush Sr. has mentioned
the term in speeches. Dude, do your own
homework and stop trying to derail this thread
with meaningless drivel.
edit on 12/6/2010 by boondock-saint because: spelling



OK!!!!


Here we go!

So, let me get this straight.... The guy (Soros) that spent 40 million dollars to get Bush (that you claim in your last post to be NWO) out of the White House supports WL that you also claim to be NWO?

How does that make sense?

If so, Soros isn't the smart guy I figured him out to be....



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by XPLodER
man i never thought id say these words
boondock are you really glen beck?

lmao
nope, not even close
but thanks for the laugh



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


if you can answer just one of my questions with supportive evidence of a "NWO" conspiracy... Ill go back and read every single line of this thread and apologize.

edit to add: in the context of a small "elite" group of individuals that are controlling the world and label themselves as the NWO.

The fact that small groups of men gave conspired through the ages to conceal information, gain power, influence policy, control wealth is nothing new and very real. The thought that one group of men controls it all and calls themselves the NWO is absurd and very unreal.

Its easily concievable we can call the world, in general, a New World Order since the end of WW2 or the rise of the United States as the worlds super power. But from what I could tell at the beginning of the thread it seems to me you are on this NWO conspiracy train that rides directly into fantasy land of the likes of the illuminati and such non sense.

I include the NWO in the imaginary boogey men camp, if you couldn't tell.
edit on 6-12-2010 by open_eyeballs because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
So, let me get this straight.... The guy (Soros) that spent 40 million dollars to get Bush (that you claim in your last post to be NWO) out of the White House supports WL that you also claim to be NWO?

How does that make sense?

cuz Soros and many others knew Bush Jr.
to be an idiot. Nobody wants an idiot in
the NWO just cuz of who their daddy was.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:40 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


lol im glad you can see my sence of humor
i wounder with all thats going on at the moment how can you be
sure of anything
what i mean is
couldnt i be glen beck?
xploder



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
if you can answer just one of my questions with supportive evidence of a "NWO" conspiracy... Ill go back and read every single line of this thread and apologize.

how ironic

cuz reading this thread is where
ur gonna find the evidence.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by XPLodER
what i mean is
couldnt i be glen beck?

of course u could be glen beck
however I doubt it due to ur
stance on this thread.

ur probably closer to Hilary Clinton's
viewpoint than Beck's.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 06:53 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


So its above you to do something as simple as repost a bit of information? Im not going to read through 30 pages of nonsense. You don't even have to prove it. All you have to do is provide a sliver of evidence that points to some group of men are in control of the world that label themselves the NWO...very simple.

You still haven' replied to the fact that your percieved "blackmail" has not worked. your whole argument contradicts the NWO conspiracy theory. I think Ill stop now.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
So, let me get this straight.... The guy (Soros) that spent 40 million dollars to get Bush (that you claim in your last post to be NWO) out of the White House supports WL that you also claim to be NWO?

How does that make sense?

cuz Soros and many others knew Bush Jr.
to be an idiot. Nobody wants an idiot in
the NWO just cuz of who their daddy was.



Ok, then the NWO are really smart guys I suppose... Even though I find it to be kind of a stretch.

But who and what are the NWO?



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
if you can answer just one of my questions with supportive evidence of a "NWO" conspiracy... Ill go back and read every single line of this thread and apologize.

how ironic

cuz reading this thread is where
ur gonna find the evidence.


Then it would be easy enough for you to just post a link to this evidence you have, rather than just brush it of, that's what we've been asking for the last 20 pages of this thread.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by open_eyeballs
So its above you to do something as simple as repost a bit of information? Im not going to read through 30 pages of nonsense.


2 things
I have spent a large amount of time researching,
posting links, articles, videos and answering questions
in 34 pages. If u r so f'ing lazy that can't read what
I have already posted then u ain't worth the comments.
Secondly, if u think it's non-sense, then u don't need to
be on this thread. So click the red x and good bye.



Originally posted by open_eyeballs
You still haven' replied to the fact that your percieved "blackmail" has not worked.


Hilary Clinton has stated she will no
longer hold public office after her tenure.
Looks like it's working to me



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Secondly, if u think it's non-sense, then u don't need to
be on this thread. e


So anyone not suporting view has nothing to do here?

Guess I should have left a couple of pages ago then eh?



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:36 PM
link   
OK everyone WL must be real as ATS is not allowing discussion of it being a farce... It must be real.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by XPLodER
what i mean is
couldnt i be glen beck?

of course u could be glen beck
however I doubt it due to ur
stance on this thread.

ur probably closer to Hilary Clinton's
viewpoint than Beck's.


lol hairy clinton lmao
i wounder if i can get you to promise a retraction if you are shown to be wrong?
i sure will retract my statements of support for wiki if the NWO thing pans out
will you offer a "i was wrong thread" if latter on down the track
wiki is shown to do public good?

i know if you are proven right im prepaired to do so

ps as hilary clinton i apoligise to the world for being a usless diplomat
lol

xploder



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:41 PM
link   
reply to post by TSAisaSCAM
 


Don't be bitter your thread went haywire, but mixing religion into this allready volatile mix was a recipe for disaster mate.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
But who and what are the NWO?


the what is here



the who is a combination list of Bildebergers, CFR Members
and IMF and World Bank Members. Some people are
one more than one list.

Soros is listed on the CFR and the Rothschilds
whom Soros represents are on the Bildeberger,
and CFR.



posted on Dec, 6 2010 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
So anyone not suporting view has nothing to do here?

not what I said

I said if u think it's nonsense
u don't need to be here.
I said nothing about supporting
views.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join