Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

The Cantankerous Gentleman blog was kind enough to notice my blog post of last week about the Center for Rural Affairs in Lyons, Nebraska--which dumps money into political campaigns in the state and refuses to disclose its donors

beatricefiddler.typepad.com...

Another blogger...
This PROOF is getting better and better..

Well if the main stream media is fixed and biased to release info that is controlled then where is one to turn to other than blog posts and such for some kind of honest information. And I am not saying that blogs are not controlled but who started the whole "it's a blog not from a news site" so the information is non credible? Really because people can't claim on one hand that there is no proof because of someones sources include opinion, blog, etc, and then in the same argument say that you cannot trust the news thats why wikileaks is so important. It's a double standard and a lose lose argument to try to have, it just keeps going in circles and becomes nothing more than a glorified peeing war?

reply to post by boondock-saint


You present a theory as plausible as the next here on ATS. I listened to the video and found little outside of what has already been stated on Glenn Back. It seems to be more echo chamber than bona fide. The prediction in the video for the imminent attack on Iran were off the mark as well.

online.wsj.com...

The article above from the WSJ goes into a little more detail on WL funding. Of course, if you read it, the George Soros option is still in play as WL does not disclose its donors. It makes a great story though. TPTB conducting a proxy war against other TPTB for diminishing territory.

Do I believe wealthy individuals or cabals of powerful/wealthy individual would stop at little to further their aims? Abso-tutely. That is how they got there in the first place. No honest man can start at zero and amass billions in one lifetime ethically.

Will this be played by George Soros or others like him? Definitely. And if he is behind it from the start (which I still am not sold on yet) it seems to be working well. Who likes their politicians or diplomats? They are an easy target. Their immoral behavior just makes it easier to sell.

Originally posted by jaynkeel
Well if the main stream media is fixed and biased to release info that is controlled then where is one to turn to other than blog posts and such for some kind of honest information.

great point indeed.
of course it's only news when it
comes from MSM.

no wait, can't trust them either

ok, so nothing on the internet is real
or truthful. Then that means the wiki
releases are fake too.

It seems the whole internet is
becoming 1 big Psy-Op.
Always selling something,
even if it's horse manure.

consider this
if you were trying to discredit some one what would you do
link them to people who are hated?
leave a bread crumb here and there?

because if you said it openly people wouldnt beleive you
but if you LEED them to a conclusion it sticks
remember guys
there are profesionals trying to discredit wiki

dont fall for this crap

judge a man by his actions
this guy and wiki are risking their lives here
the rest is hearsay atm

xploder

Originally posted by XPLodER
this guy and wiki are risking their lives here

and u know this how?
cuz the same MSM told u ???

reply to post by boondock-saint

It seems the whole internet is
becoming 1 big Psy-Op.
Always selling something,
even if it's horse manure.

That's what I've been saying in this thread..

Originally posted by XPLodER
consider this
if you were trying to discredit some one what would you do
link them to people who are hated?
leave a bread crumb here and there?

because if you said it openly people wouldnt beleive you
but if you LEED them to a conclusion it sticks
remember guys
there are profesionals trying to discredit wiki

dont fall for this crap

judge a man by his actions
this guy and wiki are risking their lives here
the rest is hearsay atm

xploder

That can go both ways though as there are probably just as many paid disinfo agents from soros and gang doing the very same thing, as they have already came out and publicly did it to Beck.

reply to post by jaynkeel

That can go both ways though as there are probably just as many paid disinfo agents from soros and gang doing the very same thing, as they have already came out and publicly did it to Beck.

True, and that's why it's all simple speculation and opinions..

NO ONE has shown any facts linking Wiki with anyone....

Originally posted by backinblack
NO ONE has shown any facts linking Wiki with anyone....

so I guess Mark Stevens is a figment of our
imagination then since he represents
Soros and Assange and Bradley Manning.
How stupid of me for thinking otherwise.

reply to post by boondock-saint


you know that i could be made to look like anything with a few blog posts
a few "placed" awards
have you read the white paper from the pentagon
it clearly states the aim to contain wiki is public opinion
and they could easy "place" articals to make people doubt
i know from the activity thats going on tptb are taking this seriously enough to
"place" things all over the net to "place" doubt

my lawer has other clients but i dont know them never met them and dont know who they are
but i am not acociated with them
only my lawer

dont spread guesses because it can be mistaken as truth

dont beleive me find and read the white paper

xploder

Originally posted by XPLodER
dont believe me find and read the white paper

do u have a link
to that white paper ???
else I have no clue how to find it.

ya know what,
this could all be cleared up by
1 interview with Assange and he
just tell us that Soros or any of his
organizations are not contributing
to wikileaks.

His secrets only protect his donors,
if Soros is NOT a donor then him saying
they do not contribute is NOT a breech
of that secrecy. It just proves who is
not contributing.

A notice to any reporter who does a Assange
interview, just ask him the question. So we
can move on

I agree that the main stream media seems to be eating this up. When we know that , in the past, if they really didn't want the masses to know they wouldn't be reporting it.

Originally posted by justone1
I agree that the main stream media seems to be eating this up. When we know that , in the past, if they really didn't want the masses to know they wouldn't be reporting it.

the lame stream media is losing readership everyday
more and more people are turning to alternate media
the hotest search atm is wiki
if they didnt show some of the details
people would turn them off in droves
the msmbc company required a bailout

imagine how quickly they go bust if the dont report it
just watch them shift attension away from the bigger leaks
and try to shift focus

DAMAGE CONTROL lol

if they didnt seam to be non bias the jig is up and the sheeple will ask questions

xploder

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by XPLodER
dont believe me find and read the white paper

do u have a link
to that white paper ???
else I have no clue how to find it.

with all the wiki related stuff on the net at the mo its hard to find
but i wont give up till i do
xploder

a very interesting video I found on RT
with Wayne Madsen. If you will look at the
banner across the screen around the
2 min mark it will read:

Russian envoy to NATO warns of plot
brewing against Obama.

This video was posted to youtube:
May 9, 2009

quite a long time before wikileaks
started releasing leaks on the US.

And here is the video entitled

Soros's Open Society Institute involved in Ukraine, Georgia revolutions.
Of course these are not revolutions like u would assume.
These are revolutions in debt to a Rothschild Bank

another video concerning Soros
and his economic pillaging entitled

George Soros is taking down the Euro

reply to post by boondock-saint


george soros in NWO scum
he is the guy that people should fear
he will destroy your country for a few more dollars

xp

Originally posted by boondock-saint
so I guess Mark Stevens is a figment of our
imagination then since he represents
Soros and Assange and Bradley Manning.
How stupid of me for thinking otherwise.

Stevens does not represent Soros. He has done pro-bono work for an agency that Soros funded.

Not sure when "Six Degrees of George Soros" became an American passtime, but that's all you're engaged in here.