Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

Originally posted by backinblack
I have stated there is no proof, other than bloggers, that Julian ever hacked into the US military..

indi.ca...

this is not a blog to my knowledge
and it has quite a bit of info on
Julian's past.

especially the part about hacking
the US Military

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
I have stated there is no proof, other than bloggers, that Julian ever hacked into the US military..

indi.ca...

this is not a blog to my knowledge
and it has quite a bit of info on
Julian's past.

especially the part about hacking
the US Military

Not a blog?? Did you even check??
From the home page,

My name is Indrajit Samarajiva. My Montreal friends call me Indi. My parents and people in Ohio call me Jit. People in Sri Lanka call me both, but I think I prefer Indi.

I was born in Vancouver in 1982, while my parents were in Grad School there. My family is Sri Lankan. My dad Rohan (who I call Tha Tha) and mom, Sujata (Amma), grew up in Sri Lanka. They worked really hard and got into University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser, and I got born with a Canadian passport

indi.ca...

Looks like a blog to me.......

So credible proof Julian hacked into US military or are you prepared to admit you were wrong??

Originally posted by backinblack
Well heres a simple challenge...
Show me credible proof that Julian hacked into US military sites as you state he was charged with in 1991/92.

I see NOTHING on any site other than your blogs..
Surely it was newsworthy back then...

As they say, P or get off the pot.........

well that's gonna be rather impossible
since one of the first news websites online was
CNN and that wasn't til 1995. 4 yrs afterward.

CNN debuted its news website CNN.com (initially an experiment known as CNN Interactive) on August 30, 1995.

en.wikipedia.org...

Born in Australia to a touring theater family, Julian attended 37 schools and 6 universities. As a teenager he became Australia's most famous ethical computer hacker. After referrals from the United States government his phone was tapped in 1991 and he spent 6 years in court. He hacked thousand of systems, including the Pentagon and the US military Security Coordination Center. Following a case in the supreme court, he was convicted of writing a magazine that inspired crimes against the federal government. He was instrumental in introducing the internet to Australia and co-founded one of Australia's first ISPs. He also founded the 'Pickup' civil rights group for children. A prolific programmer and consultant for many open-source projects, he was the co-inventor of 'deniable cryptography' a system used protect human rights workers from torture. He studied mathematics, philosophy and neuroscience. He has written and traveled extensively and has been the subject of several books and documentaries.

web.archive.org...://__._/wiki/Wikileaks:Advisory_Board

web.archive.org...://__._/wiki/Wikileaks:Advisory_Board

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Well heres a simple challenge...
Show me credible proof that Julian hacked into US military sites as you state he was charged with in 1991/92.

I see NOTHING on any site other than your blogs..
Surely it was newsworthy back then...

As they say, P or get off the pot.........

well that's gonna be rather impossible
since one of the first news websites online was
CNN and that wasn't til 1995. 4 yrs afterward.

CNN debuted its news website CNN.com (initially an experiment known as CNN Interactive) on August 30, 1995.

en.wikipedia.org...

Sh%t, it's amazing then that I can search say WW11 and still get info, or JFK, or the USS Liberty..

BTW, what about that hacking Military claim? Still stand by a blogger??

Originally posted by backinblack
So credible proof Julian hacked into US military or are you prepared to admit you were wrong??

I am not admitting no such thing.
I see ur not even discussing any
of the Intellipedia Project at all.
Or Cass Sunstein !!!

blogs can bee reliable sources when
the MSM does not cover an event.

they are considered reliable sources
when somebody post a video of
a cop beating a pedestrian on
a utube video

or somebody post a statement
they saw Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie
fighting.

blogs are news too
whether or not u want to accept
them or not.

reply to post by jaynkeel


Your links do not work..
Are they more blogs???

reply to post by jaynkeel

thanks jaynkeel

seems as though
they don't have too many legs left to
stand on

lmao

star 4 u

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
So credible proof Julian hacked into US military or are you prepared to admit you were wrong??

I am not admitting no such thing.
I see ur not even discussing any
of the Intellipedia Project at all.
Or Cass Sunstein !!!

blogs can bee reliable sources when
the MSM does not cover an event.

they are considered reliable sources
when somebody post a video of
a cop beating a pedestrian on
a utube video

or somebody post a statement
they saw Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie
fighting.

blogs are news too
whether or not u want to accept
them or not.

Funny, before you said it wasn't from a blog..
Now are you saying it WAS from a blog but it's still credible??
Let's atleast get SOME facts from you....

reply to post by backinblack

dude,
no offense to you or your boss
but I will not address any more of
your attacks.

And I will not admit to lying
or giving up or whatever else line
or lie you come up with to
rebut this response.

i think 3 sources with the same
info is quite enough for proof.

No it is strange whatever i try to do it won't let me link to it on ats, here click on the picture of Assange and it pulls up an archived link to wikileaks archives, thats were i got the info from.

www.verumserum.com...

Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by backinblack

 

dude,
no offense to you or your boss
but I will not address any more of
your attacks.

And I will not admit to lying
or giving up or whatever else line
or lie you come up with to
rebut this response.

i think 3 sources with the same
info is quite enough for proof.

OK, bottom line..You don't admit to your mistakes/lies..

BTW, I could give you 103 sources to say planet X will be here in 2012..
Must be true huh..

Glad to see no one posting here anymore..
Threads full of lies and unsubstantiated claims just die naturally..
Good to see most at ATS are smarter than the average bear, bobo..

According to the archived wikileaks page it says it right there? Why it won't let me link to it I am not sure maybe someone else will have better luck with it?

Originally posted by jaynkeel
According to the archived wikileaks page it says it right there? Why it won't let me link to it I am not sure maybe someone else will have better luck with it?

Well the normal wikileaks site is .com......You are linking to a .org site..
Is it even the same??
I know many people have set up fake sites fot the WH etc under the .org domain...

Originally posted by jaynkeel
According to the archived wikileaks page it says it right there? Why it won't let me link to it I am not sure maybe someone else will have better luck with it?

I went through the photo as you said..
That is not the true Wikileaks site...

No idea who set that up but it aint wiki

Here I did a screen grab, it is not a .com site it is a archive of the original wikileaks site from quite a while ago, wikileaks advisory board page where the text i pulled from earlier.

Come on now ats what the hell is going on here, i know how to post links and i know how to post picture? Seriously this ain't even funny anymore.

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by jaynkeel
According to the archived wikileaks page it says it right there? Why it won't let me link to it I am not sure maybe someone else will have better luck with it?

I went through the photo as you said..
That is not the true Wikileaks site...

No idea who set that up but it aint wiki

Well everything you mouse over on that site points to wikileaks .org?