It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GirlGenius
I cannot live anyplace that has lawn police!
Originally posted by Pervius
So the man was deprived of Property without Due Process nor compensated for the loss of said Property.
Only in America.
Land of the Free my rear.
Why people put on our military uniform and fight for this country is beyond me. We are NOT a land of the free.
We have lost everything. Our ability to babble on the internet is the last thing we have left and it's about to go bye-bye.
MINNESOTA STATE CONSTITUTION
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 1. OBJECT OF GOVERNMENT. Government is instituted for the security, benefit and protection of the people, in whom all political power is inherent, together with the right to alter, modify or reform government whenever required by the public good.
"Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as inalienable." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
Originally posted by thegoodearth
As I said before, this is happening very insidiously all over America.
Look how difficult it is becoming to even build a shed on one's own property.
The permits, the codes, the "permissions", the easements...
This is quietly happening all over America and never getting reported.
People trying to live very sparingly and being told "No."
This all fits in with the UN's nefarious Agenda 21.
Been going on now for decades.
In The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide: An introduction to Sustainable Development:
This "planning framework for sustainable development at the local level" was prepared by The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) in partnership with the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) and the International Development Research Center of Canada. Keep in mind that UNEP also prepared the GBA which also "proves" the environmental "crisis."
ICLEI's plan for transforming communities was made public knowledge at the 1996 UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II).
The ICLEI Planning Guide proposes that Stakeholders select two kinds of people to serve their agenda:
1- ordinary people who don't have "a stake" in the old system and would expect to gain power by establishing a new political system
2- media, business, political, church, and education leaders to promote the change within their field of persuasion
The ICLEI list of targeted people includes both "groups":
A. Community Residents: women, youth, indigenous people, community leaders, teachers
B. Community-Based Organizations: churches, formal women's groups, traditional social groups, special interest groups
C. Independent Sector: Non-governmental organizations (NGO). academia, media
D. Private/Entrepreneurial Sector: environmental service agencies, small business/cooperatives, banks
E. Local Government and Associations: elected officials, management staff, regional associations
F. National/Regional Government: planning commission, utilities, service agencies, financial agencies.7
All participants must embrace the collective vision of a "sustainable community". They must commit to pursue the three E's of "sustainable development": Environment, Economy and Equity referring to the UN blueprint for environmental regulations, economic controls, and social equity.
"Sustainable development is a process of bringing these three development processes into balance with each other," states ICLEID's Agenda 21 Planning Guide on page 21.
"The implementation of a sustainable development strategy therefore involves negotiation among the primary interest groups (stakeholders) involved in these development processes. Once an Action Plan for balancing these development processes is established, these stakeholders must each take responsibility and leadership to implement the plan."
Opposing voices are to be silenced.
"Implementing the 'sustainable agenda' requires marginalizing critics," says Craig Rucker, Executive Director of CFACT, a conservative public interest group in Washington, D.C. dealing with consumer and environmental issues. "Distinguished scientists who disagree with the globalist agenda are ridiculed and said to speak for conservative interests or industry (whether or not they receive industry funding) and their scientific arguments are never heard.
Some of these marginalized critics are very distinguished scientists, like Dr. Frederic Seitz, former president of the National Academies of Science and a sharp critic of ozone depletion and global warming theories, Dr. S. Fred Singer, who help establish the satellite and balloon measuring devices to track global warming, and Dr. Edward Krug, who served on NAPAAP, among others.
Some, like Dr. William Happer were even fired from their jobs questioning environmental dogma (in his case, on the issue of ozone depletion)."
So this was made quietly public in 1996, buried in pages and pages of documents and plans.
Not much is ever said about, or reported of, Agenda 21, Sustainable America, or the President's Council on Sustainable Development.
The eco-issues are veils being used by a much higher group of people who want to completely alter society and the very way of life the human race leads by their socialist ideas of cultural engineering and population control.
You may read in your local paper about Vision Millenium, WorkGroups, Total Quality Management, and Partnerships between Churches, welfare and social service agencies... etc. All smoke and mirrors for the nefarious Agenda 21.
Henry Lamb has tried very hard to get the word out about Agenda 21 and "Smart Development"
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 1-12-2010 by thegoodearth because: (no reason given)
The truth is, there are no more heroes. They have gone because we refused to help them. A hero is just an ideal, and truly one person can only do so much. The heroes have gone, because no longer do men rally behind them. We expected them to do everything for us
Originally posted by babybunnies
Originally posted by IntastellaBurst
What gives the city the right to tell people how to live on their own land ???
If the land is within city limits, that gives them the right.
Just because it's your land, doesn't mean you can do as you please. There are laws and ordanances that need to be followed in any society.