It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Does anyone here work for a petroleum company? If so, I need some help. I'm planning to fold in oil companies somehow into mix.
In order to explore a large untapped oil and natural gas reserve, what kind of an expedition would it send?
Originally posted by devilwasp
In order to explore a large untapped oil and natural gas reserve, what kind of an expedition would it send?
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
I am not writing a novel, I'm writing a fictional analysis. Besides, Tom Clancy is a dumbass so don't worry, I don't stoop to his level.
In no future war will the military be able to ignore poison gas.
It is a higher form of killing.
Professor Fritz Haber, winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, inventor of chemical warfare, 1923.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
I am not writing a novel, I'm writing a fictional analysis. Besides, Tom Clancy is a dumbass so don't worry, I don't stoop to his level.
Originally posted by FredT
Really now, Clancy is in all likelyhood one of the more informed military fiction writers. The Hunt For Red October was actually held up briefly becuase the military debated classifiying parts of it because he uncovered alot of hush hush stuff through open source literature. I am a proud owner of a first edition of that book. That being said, what is exactly your beef? Is it because the American military always come out on top?
Originally posted by devilwasp
no just some of the stuff does seem a bit crazy BUT he can back it up with facts that make you think, really good at doing that.
anyway i can understand if you dont like him its your opinion and i respect it.
hmm so your going to kill most of the company team,cool , in a sorta sadistic way but cool.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Oh yeah, get rid of the "you want America to lose" crap. It's getting REALLY old.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
I mena, where's the reality of humanity in this? Or is Clancy's world occupied with with LANTIRN, GPS, and Catholics and humans are secondary?
It's more his style of writing and his political and religious beef that I have a problem with. He is just an awful writer and extremely screwed up in the head.
Hunt for Red October was his only good book, I have always realized that. Beyond that,
Originally posted by mad scientist
You should've read Red Storm Rising the best fictional account I've ever come across of what a war between Nato and the Warsaw pact may have been like. An excellent book. It's interesting that the trigger for the war was soviet muslims sabotaging the USSR's biggest refinery.
Originally posted by devilwasp
You should've read Red Storm Rising the best fictional account I've ever come across of what a war between Nato and the Warsaw pact may have been like. An excellent book. It's interesting that the trigger for the war was soviet muslims sabotaging the USSR's biggest refinery.
Originally posted by mad scientist
So awful infact that he's sold millions of books and had several movies made - I wish I was a bad writer
Originally posted by FredT
Now Now simmer down....... I never said you want America to lose. I said "Is it because America always comes out on top" a little bit differnet. But really, he an American author who is a HUGE proponent of the American military. he was one of the few that predicted that the US would kick butt in GWI (everyone else predicted doom and gloom 10,000 body bags etc). What else would he write about. As Devilwasp pointed out he does back up his claims. Nuff said. We all have our opinions and we are all entitled to them....
Originally posted by imAMERICAN
sure, airpower and sea power is vital and important to the defense of taiwan, but lets say we get this on the offensive, even with a UN backed invasion, china boasts 2.5 million man actively, U.S has tops 600,000 or somting plus 700,000 reserves, but those 600,000 are stretched across the world and god knows where the rserves are. even with the British, French, Candians, italians and germans, i dont think its enough to topple the chinese numerical strength, we'd have to use massive air campaigns, and hope the chinese never used nukes..........................
Originally posted by zcheng
China has various kinds of missiles to take out those fighters, when the battle field is so close to Mainland China. It cost much less and much faster to produce a capable missile than a airplane.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Exactly why thousands of cruise missiles would be used to take out your air defence.
Originally posted by zcheng
Originally posted by mad scientist
Exactly why thousands of cruise missiles would be used to take out your air defence.
Chinese tactical missiles will take out those platforms to lauch such cruise missiles.
Of course, you can still lauch them at the rock bottom of the Pacific.