It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
reply to post by Exuberant1
I don't care either way if I get patted down.
But you aren't a terrrist.
You should care.
*Anyhow, people should request that the TSA workers who are about to fondle/molest/search them to change their gloves.
It makes sense.edit on 21-11-2010 by Exuberant1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MMPI2
Once again, the naysayers have failed like the intellectual children they are.
It took me 30 seconds to find the link establishing the connection between scabies transmission and TSA workers handling peoples privates, clothing and other belongings.
It is still being denied by lightweights, even though the news article is right there on the TSA's own blog.
I know it is hard to accept defeat, but you guys have been defeated and you owe the OP an apology for your hostility and anti-intellectualism.
The "patdown" process has been in effect for about 10 days, and already there is documentation of parasite transmission, in addition to agents spreading body fluids from other passengers around in an area where they force us to walk without shoes on.
Do you really need someone to connect the dots from you with a crayon to see that people in close proximity spread germs, and that the spread is facilitated by groping/fondling in the private areas, and that the problem will worsen with the passage of time?
Just wait until the next flu pandemic that spreads from asia via air traffic.
Again, you owe the OP an apology. Also, you may want to re-evaluate your hygiene practices if your attitude toward this very important topic is an indication of how well you take care of yourself and your family.
"The woman who checked me reached her hands inside my underwear and felt her way around," she said. "It was basically worse than going to the gynecologist. It was embarrassing. It was demeaning. It was inappropriate."
The beleaguered head of the Transportation Security Administration said today that at least one airport passenger screening went too far when an officer reached inside a traveler's underwear, and the agency is open to rethinking its current protocols.
An ABC News employee said she was subject to a "demeaning" search at Newark Liberty International Airport Sunday morning.
"The woman who checked me reached her hands inside my underwear and felt her way around," she said. "It was basically worse than going to the gynecologist. It was embarrassing. It was demeaning. It was inappropriate."
Originally posted by Death_Kron
You cannot catch Venereal disease from feeling the outside of someones clothes....
The lack of links in your search kind of works against your argument doesn't it?
Originally posted by earthdude
I think maybe one person in history has gotten a veneral disease off of a toilet seat. A toilet seat gets more contact than a TSA agent. So, very low risk of transmittal. Good idea though.
Originally posted by Willbert
Originally posted by Death_Kron
You cannot catch Venereal disease from feeling the outside of someones clothes....
The lack of links in your search kind of works against your argument doesn't it?
And are you willing to take that risk.. go right ahead.. it is your right to do as you please.
Fact: It is possible to get STDS from toilets and towels.. why not from clothings.. who knows how others hygene is when it comes to another person.
But yes.. you go right ahead and accept nothing can be transfered.
Originally posted by ararisq
The amazing ignorance and blindness on this thread has prompted me to respond. There are numerous articles discussing TSA contact with bodily fluid including urine.
Originally posted by ararisq
Despite that, the fact is that TSA is wearing gloves for their protection and they are coming in contact with thousands of traveler's skin (not only clothing).
Originally posted by ararisq
How can you in good conscience suggest that all of the thousands of TSA agents never come in contact with the skin of other passengers?
Originally posted by ararisq
Any contact with skin, with hair, with prosthetics, and other medical devices including urostomy bags can lead to contact with disease including STD.
Originally posted by earthdude
I think maybe one person in history has gotten a veneral disease off of a toilet seat. A toilet seat gets more contact than a TSA agent. So, very low risk of transmittal. Good idea though.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by MMPI2
Then it will be no trouble for you at all to source a single source proving that a pat search has led to venereal infection. I'll even allow that you can include law enforcement in that search, since obviously using the TSA yields ZERO Google hits.
I think, when it's all said and one the scoreboard will look something like this.... Heff: 1, hyperbole: 0
~Heff
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by MMPI2
Then it will be no trouble for you at all to source a single source proving that a pat search has led to venereal infection. I'll even allow that you can include law enforcement in that search, since obviously using the TSA yields ZERO Google hits.
I think, when it's all said and one the scoreboard will look something like this.... Heff: 1, hyperbole: 0
~Heff
Originally posted by GhostLancer
The part of the OP about TSA agents and gloves and STDs... fine. But, it's a bit below the belt to try to make a racial issue saying that black women have herpes. White women do to. As do Asians and Hispanics. C'mon OP, you shouldn't have sunk to that level, IMHO.
ANYONE can have an STD, even the prettiest, most proper lady of ANY race who you'd never suspect or expect to have herpes. You made a big mistake by slanting the discussion towards ONLY black women, IMHO. It was a cheap shot and possibly revealing about the true aim of this post? Is this a clandestine back-door dig at the First Lady?