It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
News to me, I've never heard that chapter as being about Jesus.
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works,
before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity,
from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth,
when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place,
before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields
or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place,
when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above
and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary
so the waters would not overstep his command,
and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side.
I was filled with delight day after day,
rejoicing always in his presence,
31 rejoicing in his whole world
and delighting in mankind.
32 “Now then, my sons, listen to me;
blessed are those who keep my ways.
33 Listen to my instruction and be wise;
do not ignore it.
34 Blessed is the man who listens to me,
watching daily at my doors,
waiting at my doorway.
35 For whoever finds me finds life
and receives favor from the LORD.
36 But whoever fails to find me harms himself;
all who hate me love death.”
Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Do some research on the oldest manuscripts of the New Testament where when reference was made to Jesus, they had used a code that stood for Jehovah and then later copiers did not understand what it meant and just filled in what seemed to fit, the name, Jesus. There are historians who believe that the earliest Christians equated Jesus to who was known by the Hebrews as, Jehovah.
There is none (need to swear fealty) and what on earth would make you think there is?
But the father of Christ is the God who spoke to the Hebrews in the midst of fire and smoke! To say that we, who are living today, do not owe allegiance to the God of the Old Testament is the same as saying that there is no need to swear fealty to the one and only true God who is the Father of Jesus Christ. You are so close to the beginning of understanding of truth but at the last second you veer away from it.
There is none (need to swear fealty) and what on earth would make you think there is?
Remember circumcision? That was the big bugaboo in Paul's time and it had to do with this sort of idea you seem to be fascinated by.
Did you just find a Bible laying around the house and one day decided to start reading it? Not that there is anything wrong with that but you might need some more time at it to be formulating your own system of theology.
And how do you understand the covenant of circumcision, my friend? That it is the actual removal of some/all of the foreskin which will be credited to you as righteousness by God?
Who's transgressing? Are you suggesting that I am? If your theology comes from a church you attend, I would call it the synagogue of Satan because you have a denial of Christ for the sake of a Being that Paul called an Angel who gave the Law to Moses.
That is transgression, my friend. You accuse me of something I am not guilty of doing.
One must obey the law. That is the essence of circumcision. And what is the greatest commandment in the Law?
Jesus replied: “ ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’This is the first and greatest commandment." (Matthew 22:37-38)
Which God was Jesus referring to? Himself?
And how do you understand the covenant of circumcision, my friend? That it is the actual removal of some/all of the foreskin which will be credited to you as righteousness by God?
Paul shattered that heresy by the Judaizers. Basically telling them they should be really really righteous and snip the entire thing off instead of the foreskin.
LOL!!!
so you acknowledge a Spirit was infact what Paul heard,
“What about it? Christ spoke to Paul while the latter was on his way to Damascus.”
and what is the Name of your "one" father/son/spirit or god?
and judging by your last maddening mixed wine post about circumcision and "the law"
What I was asking in a roundabout way was how you originally came up with the conclusion you are currently espousing. Did you just all of a sudden have this flash of insight while reading the Bible or were you taught this view, or are you just coming from an earlier agnostic background?
I think the general consensus on this verse by translators and commentators
A suggestion would be that the word here translated as god in English has become defined by its use in the Bible and when it was written, would have been ambiguous to mean practically anything of a divine nature.
99% of Christians believe Jesus is god, so I think it would be incumbent upon you to make the point stick…
I propose that someone who does not believe in this most basic premise is in fact not a Christian but some other type of believer who feels a spiritual connection with God, a god he has not idea of the nature of, seeing as he has already rejected Jesus as being our best example of god in a human form, sent to instruct us in the most authoritative manner possible.
Who's transgressing? Are you suggesting that I am? If your theology comes from a church you attend, I would call it the synagogue of Satan…I think you need to fall on your knees at the foot of the cross and ask Jesus to forgive you your fornication with the harlot of the anti-Christ who stands in the temple claiming to be god.
---which is more laughable, my friend? That you answered a question you did not understand and one that is not directed at you or the fact that you cannot give me answers to the questions I posed to you? In case you’ve forgotten already, here are my questions which you haven’t answered yet:
“And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. (Mark 10:18)
"for the Father is greater than I." (John 14:28)
“If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true." (John 5:31)
"By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." (John 5:30)
Why don’t you explain them to me in accordance with your belief so that I may be enlightened and turn my back from my false beliefs, if that is really the case? If Jesus is the Father who came down from heaven as a human being, then why do these verses seem to contradict that?
My questions are sincere and I am hoping for sincere answers.
...why not use the Bible and explain it in an orderly way to reinforce what you believe, instead of commenting based on your own opinion or the opinion of others?
This is an example of you misunderstanding what I meant. What I was implying was that there are verses you just pass over because unsophisticated type people had misinterpreted it to the point that a more knowledgeable person would avoid it as a lost cause. I was not claiming to be sophisticated myself.
I honestly expected some breeding from someone who claims to be sophisticated.
. . .you proceeded by slandering the doctrine of my church (of which name you don’t even know).
Originally posted by Rustami
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?-John14
Originally posted by Joecroft
What Jesus means in that verse, is that those who know him (Jesus) have also heard Gods words through him and have therefore come to know God also. Jesus says those who have seen him have seen the Father because Jesus is in the likeness of God/Father.
As for physical circumcision, we are no longer under the old law because we have the new law written on our hearts, through the Holy Spirit.
Jesus brings a new understanding to the commandments by his teachings and shows that the laws in essence have not changed, but it is the Holy Spirit that helps to guide us to keep the laws.
Originally posted by bijouramov
reply to post by Rustami
How did you ever come to the conclusion that I said Paul heard a spirit? Are you trying to tell me that Christ after his resurrection or even after he ascended to heaven became a spirit? Because this is what the Bible has to say about that
“Let Your hand be upon the man of Your right hand, upon the son of man whom You made strong for Yourself.” (Psalms 80:17)
When Jesus ascended to heaven, the apostles continued to uphold and teach the truth that He is man. Apostle Peter taught that Christ is a man attested by God through miracles, wonders, and signs
Apostle Paul taught that Christ, who is man, is the Mediator between God and men:
“For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5)
These are three and not one in nature or rank, my friend. The Father is the only true God Almighty who is Spirit in nature. Christ is the Son of God, a man whom God has exalted to his right hand after Christ suffered through death to pay for the sins of his body which is his church (Colossians 1:18). The Holy Spirit is the power that comes from God (Luke 24:49) which He gave to Jesus Christ to serve as a witness to the whole world of Christ’s Sonship.
“You stiff-necked people! Your hearts and ears are still uncircumcised.You are just like your ancestors: You always resist the Holy Spirit!” (Acts 7:51)
“The one who is not circumcised physically and yet obeys the law will condemn you who, even though you have the written code and circumcision, are a lawbreaker." (Romans 2:27)
For Gentiles, physical circumcision is not and should not be required of them because of the simple reason that they are not Jews! The real circumcision is not of the flesh but of the heart, made not by the knife (or whatever they used back then) but by the Spirit. If you’re a Jew, physical circumcision is useless if you don’t obey the law. And is the Law that was given to the Jews the same Law that Christ taught?
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. Truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Is circumcision of the heart and ears, by the Holy Spirit, a blasphemy as you claim? It is a commandment of the Law which Christ taught and which applies both to Jews and Gentiles according to the Bible. The physical circumcision, well, you can leave that to the Jews. The spiritual circumcision however is taught by Christ himself.
Anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:17-19)
Originally posted by Rustami
whats the name of the Father?
Originally posted by Rustami
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.. made in the likeness of men and being found in fashion as a man-Phil2
Well, that’s been debated for a long time and is something I have researched; I personally believe Gods name to be Yahweh, although I could be wrong. I have looked at the grammatical considerations for Gods real name but it is extremely complicated.
One of the primary expressions of Jewish faith, recited twice daily in prayer, is the Shema, which begins "Hear, Israel: The L-rd is our G-d, The L-rd is one." This simple statement encompasses several different ideas: 1. There is only one G-d. No other being participated in the work of creation. 2. G-d is a unity. He is a single, whole, complete indivisible entity. He cannot be divided into parts or described by attributes. Any attempt to ascribe attributes to G-d is merely man's imperfect attempt to understand the infinite. 3. G-d is the only being to whom we should offer praise. The Shema can also be translated as "The L-rd is our G-d, The L-rd alone," meaning that no other is our G-d, and we should not pray to any other.
Although many places in scripture and Talmud speak of various parts of G-d's body (the Hand of G-d, G-d's wings, etc.) or speak of G-d in anthropomorphic terms (G-d walking in the garden of Eden, G-d laying tefillin, etc.), Judaism firmly maintains that G-d has no body. Any reference to G-d's body is simply a figure of speech, a means of making G-d's actions more comprehensible to beings living in a material world. Much of Rambam's Guide for the Perplexed is devoted to explaining each of these anthropomorphic references and proving that they should be understood figuratively. We are forbidden to represent G-d in a physical form. That is considered idolatry. The sin of the Golden Calf incident was not that the people chose another deity, but that they tried to represent G-d in a physical form.
This followed directly from the fact that G-d has no physical form. As one rabbi explained it to me, G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd. We refer to G-d using masculine terms simply for convenience's sake, because Hebrew has no neutral gender; G-d is no more male than a table is. Although we usually speak of G-d in masculine terms, there are times when we refer to G-d using feminine terms. The Shechinah, the manifestation of G-d's presence that fills the universe, is conceived of in feminine terms, and the word Shechinah is a feminine word.
G-d transcends time. He has no beginning and no end. He will always be there to fulfill his promises. When Moses asked for G-d's name, He replied, "Ehyeh asher ehyeh." That phrase is generally translated as, "I am that I am," but the word "ehyeh" can be present or future tense, meaning "I am what I will be" or "I will be what I will be." The ambiguity of the phrase is often interpreted as a reference to G-d's eternal nature.
The Bible states that humanity was created in the image of G-d, but what does it mean to be created in the image of G-d? Clearly, we are not created in the physical image of G-d, because Judaism steadfastly maintains that G-d is incorporeal and has no physical appearance. Rambam points out that the Hebrew words translated as "image" and "likeness" in Gen. 1:27 do not refer to the physical form of a thing. The word for "image" in Gen. 1:27 is "tzelem," which refers to the nature or essence of a thing, as in Psalm 73:20, "you will despise their image (tzel'mam)." You despise a person's nature and not a person's physical appearance. The word for physical form, Rambam explains, is "to'ar," as in Gen. 39:6, "and Joseph was beautiful of form (to'ar) and fair to look upon." Similarly, the word used for "likeness" is "damut," which is used to indicate a simile, not identity of form. For example, "He is like (damuno) a lion" in Ps. 17:12 refers not to similar appearance, but to similar nature.
What is it in our nature that is G-d-like? Rashi explains that we are like G-d in that we have the ability to understand and discern. Rambam elaborates that by using our intellect, we are able to perceive things without the use of our physical senses, an ability that makes us like G-d, who perceives without having physical senses.