Anger mounts over Michelle Obama's 5-day Spanish holiday

reply to post by Hemisphere

I think you're dead on with Barry's faith. Like those at the top of the food chain, he serves no God. God on the other hand, and any "God" will do as we've seen, serves him. He's outwardly a man of all faiths but inwardly of no faith. He's an ideologue. The agenda is lord. That's what this puppet (Bush and all of the presidents knew this too) has on the rest of us. He can live and work with impunity as there is no greater authority than himself.

"I will be like the most High"

Originally posted by Krzyzmo


This is how Washington relaxes, and pays for it with our tax money. When we go on vacation, the money for the trip comes out of our own pockets. Pelosi flies her family and friends around the world on Air Force jets all the time, with no expense to her personally. What Obama is showing with this vacation is Washington has no thought or conscious for the people it represents, and the struggles we are going through. This trip shows the arrogance of Obama, again

www.dailymail.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

They rich do'nt pay for anything....that is how they stay rich......

OH Spain, I wonder how many of the global elite are in Spain this week?

Globalists Race To Enforce Criminal Carbon Tax

www.prisonplanet.com...
Friday, August 6, 2010

Both Strong and Gore come from the

Club of Rome clique,

who in their 1991 Report, “The First Global Revolution” openly admitted how they were planning to exploit the contrived hoax of global warming in order to further their agenda.


The elite are still desperate to impose a consumption tax on Americans as part of the move towards a “post-industrial revolution” and the kind of nightmare “green economy” that has left Spain with a 20 per cent unemployment rate. In a so-called green economy, over 2.2 jobs are lost for every “green job” created.

In South Africa we are used to this type of money spending,if they do it enough you guys will get used to it.We are all in the same boat,Bigger fish feed of the smaller fish.

reply to post by Wolfenz


Great vids Wolfenz. Thanks for those.

From Wiki: The remaining Kennedy assassination related documents are scheduled to be released to the public by 2017, twenty-five years after the passage of the JFK Records Act.

Scheduled yes, will they be released at that time? We will soon see and how would we know what was recorded specifically for our consumption 25 years further into the NWO agenda? The truth, we could have handled the truth but there would have been a house cleaning and we can readily conclude that the one time Director of the CIA, G.H.W. Bush would have been tossed with the trash.

John J. McCloy from what little I've seen here must have been an NWO referee/watch dog at these hearings. He likely oversaw what was released as well as the final verbiage for what was documented and is soon to be released. In 2017 all directly involved with the commission as well as their kin and confidants will surely be long dead. How did we ever accept such a blatant cover-up?

As for Barry and Michelle, I would not put them in the same class as a JFK. JFK was no sweetheart as we know but their roads to puppet power were radically different. Neither is better or more acceptable just radically different. Kennedy obviously born to rule and positioned by his father's ill gotten gains, seemed to fight against the NWO agenda once he thought he was beyond their control. Ouch! Big freakin' ouch! Barry on the other hand is a creation, molded from childhood by the Ford Foundation to serve the NWO agenda. The story of his shattered family life is a guide book for mind control. They produced a man without a family, country, race, faith or so much as a thought of his own. He is all and he is nothing in particular. If you squint enough you can see anything in him. The perfect puppet and the perfect lure.

Obama's mother - an unconventional life

Obama's controllers were and are never far away despite the quaint stories of an independent high school basketballer. His life has been anything but storybook American. His controllers always present, overlapping but never permanent include(d) a radical leftist mother supported by the Ford Foundation, a birth father that abandoned him and his beloved but flawed mother, an alcoholic Muslim step-father (Lolo Soetoro), Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Alinsky by proxy, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko and Rahm Emanuel among others. How could independent thought and conscience survive such an onslaught? Do people arrive at liberal/leftist thinking on their own? Certainly but that was clearly not the case with BO. It's not like he had a multitude of choices. He was funneled into one choice his entire life. He didn't stand a chance of being anything but leftist.

Kennedy on the other hand was allowed to have a conscience. If we can thank Catholicism for anything it was the guilt in JFK. TPTB thought he would ignore his nagging conscience, they offered him so much in lieu of conscience and held it all over him. His controllers considered Kennedy's dependency on pain killers and his appetite for sex would over-ride his notion of being a force for justice. They thought his father's scandalous climb to power in Boston and his fantasy filled navy record would keep him from bucking his riders.

Obama has had no such luxury in his life. TPTB learned their lessons well with Kennedy. They took all of the chance out of selecting a president. They hand crafted "Pinocchio". I doubt that Barrack will ever seriously challenge his programming.

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
It probably costs taxpayers that much a day no matter where she is.

Biggest non-issue of the week to get angry about.

Agreed.

If the Original Poster had complained that our upper tiers of Govt. were doing this for decades instead of singling out the current first Lady, I'd have felt this wasn't a partisonship message. Pointing fingers at one side doesn't tell the whole corrupt picture. This is not a Michele Obama or Obama administration problem. This is a disconnet that goes to both parties in our Govt. This thread seems to be trolling for support against Obama.

I have news for the Obama haters. If you get your Republican President in office in 2012, things will still be the same. The system is corrupt and the people plugged into it take advantage of what's available to them.

BTW, when your Republican first lady travels to Spain, I'll bet she has the same protection and costly treatment. The question is will you be shouting about it then or embracing it as necessary. I'll bet the latter.

[edit on 8-8-2010 by thepixelpusher]

Originally posted by thepixelpusher
I have news for the Obama haters. If you get your Republican President in office in 2012, things will still be the same. The system is corrupt and the people plugged into it take advantage of what's available to them.

So, if they are all the same (and I agree), you should have no problem with "Obama haters". If the system is corrupt (and I agree) you should hate Obama, as well, since he is part of the system and works everyday to ensure that corrupt system is maintained.

Obama's doing it, GW Bush did it, Bill Clinton did it, GHW Bush did it, etc.

So, why condemn those who now speak out against Obama?

reply to post by WTFover


I don't spin my wheels working myself up into a frenzy of useless hate against anyone. So, please don't suggest I, or others, hate anyone.

"Obama hating", "Sarah Palin hating", etc. is useless. Change the system that surrounds the process and drop the counterproductive hating. But change the system to be equal for all, not just to Republican advantage. Otherwise you'll be a hypocrite.

[edit on 8-8-2010 by thepixelpusher]

Now you people are telling her how to spend her money? And how many vacations she can take? Get over it. And who are 'the elite'? The only thing that makes them elite is you all constantly calling them that.

Originally posted by kozmo
Weren't they just on a vacation last moth? And weren't they on a vacation just the month before that? How many fekking vacations does this modern day Marie Antionette need? Bush, who I hated almost as much, at least went to either Camp David or to his ranch in Texas to vacation. These "Ruling Elite" are really, REALLY pushing us hardworking Americans right toward the edge!!!

And there's nothing you can do about it, so suck it up and back to work

reply to post by ~Lucidity


It's called setting an example. You do understand the hypocrisy right? Tighten your belts, sacrifice. as someone as high up and influential, shouldnt she have maybe done something like a small camping trip and they could do some nature activities. That woudl set a much better example for the country, cheap but still fun, family building vacations at a campground or a Best Western not The Beach Club of Villa Padierna Hotel in Marbella. What she has done is basically thumb her nose at the economically challenged American public and take off on Air Force 2 straight to Spain with the US checkbook in one hand an passport in another.

[edit on 8-8-2010 by PjZ101]

Originally posted by thepixelpusher
So, please don't suggest I, or others, hate anyone.

Yet, that is exactly what you did in your post.

Otherwise you'll be a hypocrite.

Nothing else to add....

Originally posted by thepixelpusher

I have news for the Obama haters. If you get your Republican President in office in 2012, things will still be the same. The system is corrupt and the people plugged into it take advantage of what's available to them.

No matter what "flavor" follows Obama, the new person will make Barry seem angelic. The gradual but constant slide into socialism was planned and implemented before JFK was conceived. There are no "parties", there is one party and "we the people" were not invited. Agreed, those in position take advantage.

Originally posted by thepixelpusher
But change the system to be equal for all, not just to Republican advantage.

Or...to a Democrat advantage (I guess you accidently left that part out, since you are non-partisan), which is the situation in which we now find ourselves. Democrat in the Whitehouse, Democrat control of the House and Democrat control of the Senate. Not really "equal for all", is it?

[edit on 8-8-2010 by WTFover]

Originally posted by TheBandit795


Yet members here want to take issue with first lady taking a vacation out of the U.S.. Do you own her??? They took a trip. Big deal. Other U.S. presidents have also taken vacations abroad. Here's that previously posted link again..

The Faux Scandal of Michelle Obama’s Spain Trip

"Do you own her???" ....well, no but I contribute to her salary and therefore she technically "works" for me. Let's see, does your boss have any influence over your behaviour when you are on company time? Mine does and rightfully so.

Seems many people forget we don't have a king just a president.

The same people who voted for this guy under the mantra of ...no more Bush, and Change....blah, blah, blah, things will be different.....are the same people using the status quo to tell the disgruntled to shup up. Just business as usual. Ummm, that was the whole point! Right? Wasn't this supposed to be business not as usual?

Seems to me Obama isn't the only one talking out of both sides of his mouth. And we continue to fight amongst ourselves just like they want.

Really????

Originally posted by TheBandit795


Yet members here want to take issue with first lady taking a vacation out of the U.S.. Do you own her??? They took a trip. Big deal. Other U.S. presidents have also taken vacations abroad. Here's that previously posted link again..

"Do you own her???" ....well, no but I contribute to her salary and therefore she technically "works" for me. Let's see, does your boss have any influence over your behaviour when you are on company time? Mine does and rightfully so.

Seems many people forget we don't have a king just a president.

The same people who voted for this guy under the mantra of ...no more Bush, and Change....blah, blah, blah, things will be different.....are the same people using the status quo to tell the disgruntled to shup up. Just business as usual. Ummm, that was the whole point! Right? Wasn't this supposed to be business not as usual?

Seems to me Obama isn't the only one talking out of both sides of his mouth. And we continue to fight amongst ourselves just like they want.

Really????


[edit on 8-8-2010 by glad_to_be_His]

....geez, please feel free to delete my first post mods. I tried to edit out the extra quote and ended up with a double post of sorts. Sorry

Originally posted by glad_to_be_His

Originally posted by TheBandit795


Yet members here want to take issue with first lady taking a vacation out of the U.S.. Do you own her??? They took a trip. Big deal. Other U.S. presidents have also taken vacations abroad. Here's that previously posted link again..

"Do you own her???" ....well, no but I contribute to her salary and therefore she technically "works" for me. Let's see, does your boss have any influence over your behaviour when you are on company time? Mine does and rightfully so.

Seems many people forget we don't have a king just a president.

The same people who voted for this guy under the mantra of ...no more Bush, and Change....blah, blah, blah, things will be different.....are the same people using the status quo to tell the disgruntled to shup up. Just business as usual. Ummm, that was the whole point! Right? Wasn't this supposed to be business not as usual?

Seems to me Obama isn't the only one talking out of both sides of his mouth. And we continue to fight amongst ourselves just like they want.

Really????


[edit on 8-8-2010 by glad_to_be_His]

once you were right once upon a time we actually had presidents

but now we DO have a king and queen............think not look at their treatment by their supporters.

[edit on 8-8-2010 by neo96]

....well, no but I contribute to her salary and therefore she technically "works" for me. Let's see, does your boss have any influence over your behaviour when you are on company time? Mine does and rightfully so

The FLOTUS receives no salary. I'm sure you'd like your boss to be able to tell your partner what to do and berate them for spending money you gave them or that they already have from their own job.

[edit on 8-8-2010 by pr3l33t]

reply to post by WTFover

Maybe the point is they should hate the system not the people. Hating the people is petty. Makes no sense. Most would agree.

Thing is, words mean a lot. They matter. Even when it's subtle.

We all know or should know that most of the time when someone says "Obama" it's really just a lazy or shortcut way of saying "the system" or "the administration" or the "federal government."

Problem is not everyone recognizes when it is used that way. They someone say "Obama" and assume one of two things: 1.) that it's a partisan attack on the man or 2.) that this is the way to voice your anger or disgust or outrage, by attacking a figurehead.

At the same time, or maybe as a result of this, some people really do just hate or despise the man, or now it seems his family. I think that's the case here. Because someone told them to be angry but they don't really even understand why for the most part or exactly what it is they're so angry at.

Maybe if everyone just took a chill and didn't jump so fast before thinking about what the real cause are and what they're really angry about and then just used the right words to define what the problem really is, there'd be a lot less bickering.

Whatever the case, this kind of stuff just fuels BS partisan division that is killing this country, pitting American against American is some imaginary war that someone will imaginarily win. And as we bicker. the country suffers...root causes never get addressed, agreed upon, and fixed. Because we're busy bickering.

But, hey, someone clearly wants it this way.

[edit on 8/8/2010 by ~Lucidity]