It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OneisOne
That post almost made me fall out of my chair laughing!
I think that is the point of the outrage. Not the fact they can afford to spend the money, but the fact they are telling Americans to cut back and then turn around and spend money on such a lavish trip. From the beginning the press have tried to paint the couple as a common family. All the attention the press gave to Michelle wearing J. Crew, comes to mind.
As for the 40 plus friends, are they paying their own way for this trip?
If not then it does not matter how wealthy one is, just become chummy with someone of wealth and you to can travel the globe like royalty!
when you graduate from Princeton University and Harvard Law, and work as a lawyer and a director for the Chicago Hospital system, then you cry babies can take a trip to Spain too.
Guess what, you get decent education, you get a good job, you get to take a trip.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
It probably costs taxpayers that much a day no matter where she is.
Biggest non-issue of the week to get angry about.
Not if she stays in the White House as an example during these tough economic times.
Uh, the point is that she is rubbing our noses in it to the point that one reporter actually called her the "new Marie Antoinette" for preaching (with BHO) economic restraint to the rest of us, while moving on up herself.
[edit on 8/6/2010 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by PurpleDog UK
Yagerbombs
I agree, Leadership is all about ''Leading'' from the front. You have to LEAD by example, NOT by mobile phone from the back whilst lying on a sun lounger, sipping cocktails.......
Trouble is who would replace and what makes you think any other Dem / Rep President would DO any better ??
Regards
PurpleDOG UK
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
It probably costs taxpayers that much a day no matter where she is.
Biggest non-issue of the week to get angry about.
Not if she stays in the White House as an example during these tough economic times.
Uh, the point is that she is rubbing our noses in it to the point that one reporter actually called her the "new Marie Antoinette" for preaching (with BHO) economic restraint to the rest of us, while moving on up herself.
[edit on 8/6/2010 by centurion1211]
"moving on up"???
Really Cent?? Oh, I get it. The Jefferson's were black and so are the Obamas.
This is where you claim it is common speak and not a reference to the TV show.
And I couldn't care less for Bush as for Obama. Both are puppets controlled by the same people. Both get their instructions from the Council On Foreign Relations, both have Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski behind them, as did Bill Clinto, Bush Sr, Ronald Reagan etc.... They are the same group split in two, causing this illusionary divide that keep you from discussing the REAL ISSUES. The Federal Reserve ripping you off for example..
Originally posted by nixie_nox
What a non issue to worry about.
when you graduate from Princeton University and Harvard Law, and work as a lawyer and a director for the Chicago Hospital system, then you cry babies can take a trip to Spain too.
"My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before," the future Mrs. Obama wrote in her thesis introduction. "I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don't belong. Regardless of the circumstances underwhich I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second."
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by nixie_nox
What a non issue to worry about.
when you graduate from Princeton University and Harvard Law, and work as a lawyer and a director for the Chicago Hospital system, then you cry babies can take a trip to Spain too.
Are you really sure you want to take this discussion to also discussing MO's education and the thesis on racism that she wrote?
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by nixie_nox
What a non issue to worry about.
when you graduate from Princeton University and Harvard Law, and work as a lawyer and a director for the Chicago Hospital system, then you cry babies can take a trip to Spain too.
Are you really sure you want to take this discussion to also discussing MO's education and the thesis on racism that she wrote?
Maybe read Nixie's post again...then yours.
Two posts in one page where you interject racism into the discussion.
Your tactics are not mysterious by any measure.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Uh, the point is that she is rubbing our noses in it to the point that one reporter actually called her the "new Marie Antoinette" for preaching (with BHO) economic restraint to the rest of us, while moving on up herself.
[edit on 8/6/2010 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by centurion1211
My favorite part of this controversy was that the U.S. State Department had to issue a directive that Spain was no longer considered racist - just before MO's plane landed there.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by nixie_nox
What a non issue to worry about.
when you graduate from Princeton University and Harvard Law, and work as a lawyer and a director for the Chicago Hospital system, then you cry babies can take a trip to Spain too.
Are you really sure you want to take this discussion to also discussing MO's education and the thesis on racism that she wrote?
thesis
Excerpt from her introduction:
"My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before," the future Mrs. Obama wrote in her thesis introduction. "I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don't belong. Regardless of the circumstances underwhich I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second."
Now there is someone with a racial chip on her shoulder if there ever was one. So, have her attitudes changed since she assumed a leadership role for ALL the American people, or not? Or is she just grabbing it all while while she can since it is "owed" to her.
Also notice her reference to the "liberal and open-minded white professors and classmates", and how they fall all over themselves trying show how "non-racist" they are. Sort of like many of the liberals here on ATS ...
[edit on 8/10/2010 by centurion1211]
Blacks are racist: Another Fox strategy is to cherry-pick stories to methodically create a narrative that black people are racist. This was recently used in the Shirley Sherrod story. This further fuels the “they are coming to get you” narrative, but it also provides cover for white racism. It’s like don’t feel bad if you don’t like black people because they don’t like you either. And in the end, it is going to come down to you or them.
Originally posted by CT_Flyboy
And EXACTLY how is that you think the economy gets better? By holding onto every penny you have? NO, it ONLY gets better when we spend our discretionary money.
It isn't anyone's business where the first lady goes on vacation or how much money she spends up to her expense account limit. All first ladys get an expense account to do with what they wish. And how do you know she isn't spending her own money?
In the 60's Mrs. Kennedy redecorated the white house at a cost of millions of dollars to the tax payers and no one heard a peep because JFK was a popular man.
I submit that if this were a white president and first lady we would not be having this conversation. - Can you say RACISIM - I'm sure you can...
Originally posted by CT_Flyboy
And EXACTLY how is that you think the economy gets better? By holding onto every penny you have? NO, it ONLY gets better when we spend our discretionary money.