UFO Man! Is this the next Billy Meier? CLEAR DAYTIME VIDEO!

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not



Ok I promise to take a look at your threads. I'm very curious on your perspective of things. But for now, i need to take a break, walk the dog, clear my head.

Peace

Originally posted by FlySolo

Using your logic, then every single UFO sighting involving stationary objects above ground can be explained as fishing rods. Much too convenient of an answer to serve the skeptic community.

I am talking about this case, I am not making a general assumption. You're making a straw man argument here dude.

You guys crack me up. Listen, you and Maybe not, just admit you don't want to believe in this stuff. Just admit this debate is pointless, and just admit you don't really know how he did it (if he did).

I don't believe ET is here but I am open to the possibility. I admit I'm not 100% sure on how Urzi did it or even if. But I see the trademarks of a serial hoaxer in Urzi and that makes me suspicious.

Damn, no one can even comment on the lens flare issue. How the hell do you get a lens flare off a button?

The lens flare was replicated by a member a couple of posts back.

Listen, if you're so concerned about this case why don't you try and find stuff that supports his claims?

Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

 

Ok I promise to take a look at your threads. I'm very curious on your perspective of things. But for now, i need to take a break, walk the dog, clear my head.
Peace

FlySolo.....

No worries

As per my edit in my previous post, an ex-member has inserted some "FU" graphics in that thread (& others), so I apologise for that.

I have alerted the ATS management team to this.

I will also send you one more link by U2U that you might find interesting.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Phage
Next Billy Meier? Is that supposed to be a good thing?

I wonder why he always shoots through his skylight. Very cooperative UFOs to hover over his skylight like that.

It looks like something stuck on the skylight glass to me.

He doesn't

always shoots through his skylight.

Did you watch the video. You see that he is shooting through an open window and when the outside view camera zooms out, his upper body is outside the window frame!

Boy, you've been wrong more times than right!

I am also curious about the static black dots and they also couldn't be on the lens. So that is a curiosity. How about a real possibility answer?


[edit on 24-4-2010 by The Shrike]

reply to post by discl0sur3


Hey discl0sur3, two more pages in a few hours? Now you have 8 pages in two days plus
10 flags / 142 replies. What can I say, congratulations you‘re going great!! Even that
this is an old topic discussed many times Mr. Urzi is still hot. As the proverb said:
“Any Publicity is a Good Publicity”.

Let me join the party with this two gifts from Mr. Urzi, enjoy.
May I have my piece of the cake please?

Originally posted by drew hempel
reply to post by zaiger

 

I don't doubt Jaime Maussan being a hoaxer but do you have any evidence to give credence to calling him one?

I mean I can google it but if you're going to call someone a hoaxer it'd be nice if you could at least give some specifics.

According to this definition of "hoaxer", Jaime Maussan cannot be called one. All he can be accused of is being naive and gullible and promoting material that he cannot verify. Jaime needs someone to tell him to ease up on promoting unferified material.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoaxer
"A hoax is a deliberate attempt to deceive or trick an audience into believing or accepting that something is real, when the hoaxer (the person or group creating the hoax) knows it is false. ..."

by peterfromdk:




well done!
thanks

Maybe...maybe not.... thanks for your additions also.

Originally posted by peterfromdk
He has been here on ATS before. I think he has made them just by adding a jeans button on his roof window, I have created an image by doing it this way

Thanks for your help Maybe ... maybe not
here are the pictures

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/456016643dbe.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6177e597d617.jpg[/atsimg]

Peterfromdk.....

I reckon you have just about nailed this

A quick video with the camera positioned close to the object & then moved (as per my previous posts) would wrap it up beyond all doubt, as far as I'm concerned.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by peterfromdk


Yeah a short video demonstration, then Urzi can join Meier in the [HOAX]-bin.

reply to post by cripmeister



First sorry for my bad English

I've actually made a small filmclip yesterday, but I needed a program
to crop the film clip and there is a good program for this called Vidcrop, but it costs $ 50, and I think that it is too much
to make a movie clip so I have a clip but it is an advertising banner
who jumps around on the image and it is annoying,
but one can certainly see that you can do it that way, but it is not good enough to put out here on ATS.


So if you still want to see the movie clip
you can download it here. www.indtil.dk/usbufo.rar

Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by peterfromdk

 

Yeah a short video demonstration, then Urzi can join Meier in the [HOAX]-bin.

sorry to go off topic,
except that Meier has never been proven to be a hoax.
professionals cant even re-make his stuff as he did.
I still havent seen enough credible material to be able to call "HOAX" for sure.
the 'good' far outweighs the 'bad' in that situation.

reply to post by free_spirit


Contrary to your belief...I could care less how my threads rank. I post the information that I'm truly passionate about, if it happens to snowball that is completely out of my control. As you can see, I'm very new to this forum and as such have had very little time to peruse through the many thousands of previous posts, I apologize if repeat news offends you.


VJ

reply to post by FlySolo


Just because proof that a hoax can be performed does not mean that it is a hoax. I just say, look at the evidence..

Originally posted by Ahmose

Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by peterfromdk

 

Yeah a short video demonstration, then Urzi can join Meier in the [HOAX]-bin.

sorry to go off topic,
except that Meier has never been proven to be a hoax.
professionals cant even re-make his stuff as he did.

I still havent seen enough credible material to be able to call "HOAX" for sure.
the 'good' far outweighs the 'bad' in that situation.

Ahmose......

I'll reply "off topic" once & then leave it at that:

You truly should do some more reading about Billy Meier & the ATS threads are a great place to do that.

With no rudeness intended, you will find those threads in the hoax forum & also out on the main board, where some will still be because the owners have not found them & placed them in the hoax forum as yet.

Kind regards & back on topic.....
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by The Shrike


The Shrike.....

According to this definition of "hoaxer", Jaime Maussan cannot be called one. All he can be accused of is being naive and gullible and promoting material that he cannot verify. Jaime needs someone to tell him to ease up on promoting unferified material.

As per the 2 links I posted earlier in this thread, I believe there is strong evidence Maussan is a willful hoaxer.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by MAC269


Spot on! Fishingline or something. The actual object seems legit though

reply to post by peterfromdk


Peterfromdk.....

Armap has suggested you might be able to use these free video apps with a view to posting your video in ATS media.

www.virtualdub.org...

fixounet.free.fr...

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
8 mins 23 secs

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

reply to post by peterfromdk


Peterfromdk.....

Armap converted the vidro for you & U2U'd it to me.

I have now forwarded it to you by U2U.

Originally posted by shauny

Shauny.....

I agree.....it's obvious.

As per my many posts.....

Urzi, Maussan & Harris are hoaxers.

Regards
Maybe...maybe not