UFO Man! Is this the next Billy Meier? CLEAR DAYTIME VIDEO!

Antonio Urzi and his friend Simona, from Milan, Italy, have been living an absolutely unique experience. Metallic ships, spheres of light and flotillas fly just over their heads. Antonio has filmed all kinds of UFOs from a small window in his apartment.

The UFO starts off being presented by Jaime Maussan, MUFON Director for Mexico. He presents the Urzi Case in the International UFO Congress 2009 with over 1700 UFO sightings filmed over eight years. To all the Jaime haters, don't write off the evidence because of the credibility of the presenter. This story speaks for itself in my opinion.

Take a break you keep posting these crap videos you make. Jamie maussan is a known hoaxster.

reply to post by zaiger


so you're asking if a video presented by Jaime Maussan (known hoaxer) is of similar quality to the pictures made by Billy Meier (known hoaxer)?

I would venture to say... yes.

Maybe I'm gullible (like to think that I'm not) but these videos look pretty damn legit, and I believe I was reading in the comments that this guy has around 30 hours of this kind footage?

coool.

Next Billy Meier? Is that supposed to be a good thing?

I wonder why he always shoots through his skylight. Very cooperative UFOs to hover over his skylight like that.

It looks like something stuck on the skylight glass to me.

reply to post by Jazz87


30 hours of UFO footage severely damages his claims.

UFOs are not common. Claiming to have seen more than one is on par to claiming to have had multiple near-death experiences. The odds of it being a fake go through the roof.

EDIT: I was going to comment on something related to the skylight phage - it provides a very nice overhead and out of view object from which to hang things.

[edit on 23-4-2010 by JScytale]

reply to post by zaiger


I don't doubt Jaime Maussan being a hoaxer but do you have any evidence to give credence to calling him one?

I mean I can google it but if you're going to call someone a hoaxer it'd be nice if you could at least give some specifics.

I am very skeptical I must say.

BUT, this is a very convincing video.

However, I go through things like this all the time, and I KNOW we cannot count the chickens before they hatch.

There is always more to a story.

I would like to see a lot more information about this.

It could be hoaxed, but it would require skill.

So, where can I find more information about this story??

These are some of the clearest videos that I have seen, however he still needs a tripod.

Jaime Maussan is not a "hoaxer" per se, but more akin to a cheap opportunist and willfully ignoring important facts that disagree with his gullible view.

Just because he is unreliable, does not mean this story is fake.

It just means we need to investigate ever more diligently to make sure we don't get hoodwinked.

Originally posted by muzzleflash
I am very skeptical I must say.

BUT, this is a very convincing video.

However, I go through things like this all the time, and I KNOW we cannot count the chickens before they hatch.

There is always more to a story.

I would like to see a lot more information about this.

It could be hoaxed, but it would require skill.

So, where can I find more information about this story??

This persons name is Antonio Urzi and lives in Italy. There is a ton of information available on the internet if you wanted to start there.

Originally posted by JScytale
reply to post by Jazz87

 

30 hours of UFO footage severely damages his claims.

UFOs are not common. Claiming to have seen more than one is on par to claiming to have had multiple near-death experiences. The odds of it being a fake go through the roof.

EDIT: I was going to comment on something related to the skylight phage - it provides a very nice overhead and out of view object from which to hang things.

[edit on 23-4-2010 by JScytale]

I would agree and disagree here.

I have had more than 1 sighting personally. Actually over a dozen.

But then again, I have spent countless hours scanning the night sky, where as most other people sit on their couch watching TV all night pretending that UFOs don't exist.

So I agree partially, and disagree partially.

All of my sightings were in a very short time span, roughly 4-5months no longer.

And I have been looking in the sky ever since, over 10years now. And have not seen a single other UFO to date.

SO, UFOs sightings come in "flaps".

For brief periods in specific areas, they are visable often multiple times. Than they seem to not show up after that.

If you research ufo sightings you will find that this is common, and that the flap phenomena is widely discussed.

reply to post by discl0sur3


Dear discl0sur3

If you have a very close look from 8:23 on you get some reflection from the fishing line that is holding this object in view.

Sorry all a complete Hoax.

Best Regards Paul

Originally posted by MAC269
reply to post by discl0sur3

 

Dear discl0sur3

If you have a very close look from 8:23 on you get some reflection from the fishing line that is holding this object in view.

Sorry all a complete Hoax.

Best Regards Paul

great eyes there Paul.
case closed.

Originally posted by JScytale
reply to post by Jazz87

 

30 hours of UFO footage severely damages his claims.

UFOs are not common. Claiming to have seen more than one is on par to claiming to have had multiple near-death experiences. The odds of it being a fake go through the roof.

EDIT: I was going to comment on something related to the skylight phage - it provides a very nice overhead and out of view object from which to hang things.

[edit on 23-4-2010 by JScytale]

I respectfully disagree. I don't think it's inconceivable that "they" have a few "chosen ones" that they frequently expose themselves too. The early Billy Meier material has yet to be discredited and he possesses hours of video and hundreds of photos. Just my opinion.

reply to post by discl0sur3


when scientists study ants, do they decide to choose a few ants and attempt to communicate with them while leaving them in their environment? better yet, do you REALLY think living beings from an entirely different environment with most likely entirely different senses would be able to tell the difference between any two human beings? the only reason we can is because a *very* significant chunk of our brains is dedicated solely to facial recognition. and even assuming they decided to communicate only with a few "chosen" people - wouldn't they go looking for, oh, i dont know, exceptionally intelligent critical thinkers who are actually able to hold interesting conversations in which both parties can actually learn about each other? and not new-age hippies who ramble about things that are clearly untrue.

A. Jaime Maussan

B. It is easy to shoot from a roof window with no reference point.

C. Case Closed

[edit on 23-4-2010 by Grey Magic]

Originally posted by MAC269
reply to post by discl0sur3

 

Dear discl0sur3

If you have a very close look from 8:23 on you get some reflection from the fishing line that is holding this object in view.

Sorry all a complete Hoax.

Best Regards Paul

This part of the video has been scrutinized by experts and was determined to be a lens flare from the sun reflecting off of the curved surface of the UFO. I suppose it would be fishing line but what the heck is the other end attached to? If you watch other footage that is available out there you will find many where he is zoomed out fully with the object and buildings still in frame. The only way I could see this being hoaxed is with a hot air balloon or helicopter.



[edit on 23-4-2010 by discl0sur3]

reply to post by discl0sur3


jaime maussan's specialists, right?

and the object is moving while the line is reflecting light, without the "lens flare" rotating. if it were a lens flare, it wouldn't remain directly above the object.

Originally posted by Grey Magic
A. Jaime Maussan

B. It is easy to shoot from a roof window with no reference point.

C. Case Closed

[edit on 23-4-2010 by Grey Magic]

See my reply to MAC269 above.