Major water find on the Moon!, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 45 times


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 05:55 PM by OhZone
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Cydonia2012

They detected the spectrographic signature of water. It may have been ice particles or water vapor.

Liquid water cannot exist on the surface of the Moon.


[edit on 11/13/2009 by Phage]


How would you know that?
Have you been there to do a personal inspection?

Has anyone read the book "Moongate".
It tlaks about, atmosphere and clouds.
It also gives figures on the amount of fuel it would take to get there and the size the tank would have to be. Suggestion is that if we did indeed get to the Moon, we didn't use the Hardware that they told us they used.


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 06:10 PM by Phage
reply to post by OhZone

Have you read the book Magnificent Desolation?
Have you read the book Moonshot?
Have you read the book Rocket Men?
Have you read the book Carrying the Fire?

There is no atmosphere worth talking about on the Moon. There can be no liquid water on the Moon. I don't have to go there, I can see it with my own eyes and with a telescope. No clouds, no atmosphere.



reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 07:01 PM by kleverone
reply to post by Phage


My point being that India prompted the admission by NASA. I do not believe they would have released that info if it did not share knowledge with India, who would have talked anyway.


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 07:36 PM by Raider of Truth
"The scientists hinted that other surprises may be coming in the next few months."
www.latimes.com...

disclosure is beginning to become a possibility now it's gome from like 5% chance to around 25% in my book. If they reveal artifical structures it's jumping to 95%

It can't be coincidence that they announce this a few months before predicted disclosure...enough time for it to sink in..

as another scientist says..

"The moon is alive," declared Anthony Colaprete- biggest hint of all.


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 07:54 PM by berrygurrl
reply to post by buddhasystem


So, now that NASA knows that there is water on the moon, can you or someone please explain to me why they are in talks of building a space station on the moon now that they know there is a significant amount of water??
_javascript:icon('')

Oh and the weird thing is that on Yahoo this morning the "water on the moon" article mentions: ...
"The rocket was followed four minutes later by a spacecraft equipped with cameras to record the impact which sent a huge plume of material billowing up from the bottom of the crater, untouched by sunlight for billions of years."

Well, that's bull!! From what I recall there wasn't a "huge plume"

Oh NASA..!!!_javascript:icon('')

news.yahoo.com...

Mod Note: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on Sat Nov 14 2009 by Jbird]


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 07:56 PM by freighttrain
reply to post by buddhasystem


Google promoting.. water on moon "checkout their logo today", click on it and you'll see this....




reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 08:07 PM by stanlee
Originally posted by berrygurrl
reply to post by buddhasystem


So, now that NASA knows that there is water on the moon, can you or someone please explain to me why they are in talks of building a space station on the moon now that they know there is a significant amount of water??
the significance is with GW Bush saying he wants us back on the moon. THere have always been talks of moon colonisation, atleast since the early 50's. THe only way to make a sustainable base is by having at the very least water for both drink, and rocket fuel. Water being in the craters means we can in fact achieve a rudimentary base camp for permanent stay. What else we do up there is, I guess, not our business?

Anyway thats the answer you were looking for
cheers,
Stan



reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 09:33 PM by Holographic
reply to post by buddhasystem


Thank you for this. I have a feeling disclosure is getting close.


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 09:51 PM by Ray Amuro
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by kleverone

You understand that the instrument on the Indian spacecraft, the one that detected evidence of water, was provided and operated by NASA. Right?


Yeah because no space agency can go in Space without Nasa / USA /russian authorisation and in order to do that they put stuff in foreign satellites...Guess why...


reply posted on 13-11-2009 @ 09:54 PM by The_Truth818
reply to post by Ray Amuro


Yeah because they know the truth about our moon, space, and life on other planets......
I tried to keep out my beliefs in my last post, but its too much to resist.... lol..
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^