It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ecoparity
I'm all for her groups work on challenging forced vaccinations but the Baxter thing raises some serious questions about what she's up to..... IMO
Originally posted by squiz
Why does he appear so regularly on Rense? That's one place even some CTers sometimes cringe at.
Originally posted by squiz
So why are you suspicious, what evidence do you have?
You may even be right but...
I can say the same for Niman. He's completely in line with the pharmaceutical companies on this subject. He cannot account for a natural emergence for this strain. He's made false claims in the past. As well as some baffling contradictions. He wants you to take the vaccine. Of course he plans to make money from vaccines. He can't rock the boat. His lively hood depends on it. This is also why he cannot say anything about Baxter.
He defends Baxter with a ridiculous excuse. Tell me what is his excuse for the intentional infection of AIDS to the thousands of hemophiliac patients? Perhaps they weren't real people?
He thinks Swine flu has a natural origin, but cannot explain it. Let him write a rebuttal to Adrian Gibbs, and we'll see what flies.
Why does he appear so regularly on Rense? That's one place even some CTers sometimes cringe at.
I've have several reasons for my suspicion of him. He's no different to the ones pushing the vaccine fraud. What's his agenda?
If you don't think vaccination is a fraud then show me the empirical scientific proof that vaccines are effective? I'll give you a hint, it doesn't exist.