It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by alfafox
reply to post by ls1cameric
Hello -ls1cameric- and all members in this thread
My name is Alejandro Franz from Mexico and I study UFO's since 1963
See my post regarding the thread Real Ufos In Mexico Disclosure By Air Force
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I would like to introduce myself to all members, here you can see my resume:
www.alcione.org...
I don't know if this video has been posted before. If so I'm sorry...
I hope all of you'll like this video that was made by a mexican arquitect
named Josué and I think he's one of the best CG video makers...
www.youtube.com...
Best regrads to all.
Capt. Franz
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Sam60
I really don't know, the fact that it looks like something flapping is not enough for me to think that it's really something flapping, the image is not good enough for that.
Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
I agree, Im dying to see the original..I dont think everyone will "believe" anyway, the public sees those of us who believe in ufos as nutheads.
Originally posted by Sam60
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Sam60
I really don't know, the fact that it looks like something flapping is not enough for me to think that it's really something flapping, the image is not good enough for that.
I agree, Armap.
I don't think the "flapping" effect is definitive in this video.
It's also very difficult to reconcile the "flapping" effect with any scenario other than Necati's idea of the object being CGI'd using a bird as it's basis.
On balance, I feel the lack of broad release indicates the original video might show "proof" this is something much less exciting.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I would like to see if they were coming from the ground, the fact that they do a fade in to a different scene makes me think that they may be hiding something they do not like.
Originally posted by Sam60
Like I said, I wish we could see where the "balls" go.
Why didn't they show the unedited footage like with the first video?
Or was that editing made by the author?
Originally posted by Sam60
Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
I agree, Im dying to see the original..I dont think everyone will "believe" anyway, the public sees those of us who believe in ufos as nutheads.
G'day Yummy Freelunch.....
I think you're famous now
There are so few videos & pictures of UFO's that to my mind stand up to scrutiny, it's a terrible shame to see those buried by the neverending avalanche of poorly critiqued (& even blatantly hoaxed) material.
For what it's worth, my "own" list of photos & videos is extremely short & includes the Nellis case, the NZ / ABC TV case & the Belgium triangle case (plus possibly that crazy triangle + object case from the USA, last year).
I would be absolutely thrilled if this video could be added to "my" list of those pictures & videos that are possibly "real".
[edit on 21-8-2009 by Sam60]
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Free sprirt
Is there anyway we can see raw foottage as requested since the start of this thread? and by u2u.
I would hope you would wish to put speculation to rest, especially in light of the new CGI posts.
I have film experts ready to go, and would greatly apreciate a conclusive review of the evidence, as would most on ATS.
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Surely annalysis by unbiased experts resulting in proof postivie of no tampering would only increase value of the footage.......
Originally posted by Sam60
reply to post by Arbitrageur
G'day Arbitrageur....
In case I wasn't expressing myself clearly, by "flapping" I meant "real flapping" as in a bird flapping. I didn't mean "flapping around" as in parts of the object flapping in mooted turbulence.
In the context of the "flapping around", I agree with the you the "flapping" IS easy to reconcile with other scenarios.
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Request to interview Fernandez on the proviso of raw footage annalysis has been forwarded several times, and these requests have not been adressed since the release of this compressed footaged.
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Free sprirt
Is there anyway we can see raw foottage as requested since the start of this thread?
and by u2u.
I would hope you would wish to put speculation to rest, especially in light of the new
CGI posts.
I have film experts ready to go, and would greatly apreciate a conclusive review of the
evidence, as would most on ATS.
Until we see raw footage its circle work I'm afraid.....
There delay in providing it for scutiny is unfortunate as it just leads to specualtion as to
its authenticity...why hide it? Get it out there.
If free spirirt has copyright over the footage, thats for monetary purposes one can only
assume.
[edit on 21-8-2009 by zazzafrazz]