Object near the Sun, seems to be heading toward the Sun, page 19
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 75 times


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:47 PM by Phage
reply to post by Paroxysm
The increase in solar x-ray flux is likely caused by solar flares in the region around the new sunspots in the southern hemisphere of the Sun. As you say, it is a very low level of activity.



[edit on 7/3/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:59 PM by Manjushri Bodhisattva
reply to post by downtown436


It is not Mercury. Normally you can only see Mercury when it passes in front of the Sun. When it does, it appears to be a tiny dot, smaller than some sun spots. That is not Mercury. The Object is 4x the Size of Earth...


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 09:01 PM by Manjushri Bodhisattva
reply to post by Manjushri Bodhisattva


And what is up in this Picture...

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...



reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 09:02 PM by Manjushri Bodhisattva
reply to post by Manjushri Bodhisattva


stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

These are from yesterday...

As fast as that object came in... It does not seem to have moved much the last Day...


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 11:58 PM by elfie
reply to post by Manjushri Bodhisattva


Mercury has a fairly eccentric orbit which is completed in 88 days. Would account for the speed of the approach to the transit.

en.wikipedia.org...(planet)

Mercury has the most eccentric orbit of all the planets; its eccentricity is 0.21 with its distance from the Sun ranging from 46 to 70 million kilometers. It takes 88 days to complete an orbit. The diagram on the left illustrates the effects of the eccentricity, showing Mercury’s orbit overlaid with a circular orbit having the same semi-major axis. The higher velocity of the planet when it is near perihelion is clear from the greater distance it covers in each 5-day interval. The size of the spheres, inversely proportional to their distance from the Sun, is used to illustrate the varying heliocentric distance. This varying distance to the Sun, combined with a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance of the planet’s rotation around its axis, result in complex variations of the surface temperature.



reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 01:09 AM by downtown436
Originally posted by Manjushri Bodhisattva
reply to post by downtown436


It is not Mercury. Normally you can only see Mercury when it passes in front of the Sun. When it does, it appears to be a tiny dot, smaller than some sun spots. That is not Mercury. The Object is 4x the Size of Earth...


Okay, what do you think it is?
A Comet?
A Gass giant planet, or dwarf star?
Niburu?
A bug on the lense of the Stereo B satellite?


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 02:51 AM by GezinhoKiko
reply to post by SaraThustra


amazing avator, the ladies face.

The latest images are not available right now, the satelite were the pictures are usually just says no data. Why is this?


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 03:44 AM by wycky
reply to post by GezinhoKiko


Sorry here is the link
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

Edit:
I couldn't edit my previous post on page 15

"Checkout this object moving behind the sun, Its bright, i would have to say Mercury.
The Video is from 2001.
The Planet appears at 2001/04/22 01:25"

[edit on 4/7/2009 by wycky]


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 04:02 AM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by wycky


Hi Atsers,
read the thread- I guess it could be alot of things.
if we are talking planetary, I don't see why it couldn't be Mercury. Don' think I agree with assumptions of Venus (but who knows?).
Puts me in mind of a photo I saw last month:




But not saying its that either!
There is a load of space-junk up there; it could be that too?

I suppose what I am getting at is there are a myriad of possibilities.

Does anyone know if there are any other photographs of this anomaly supplement this one?

The other thing is, (I've read most of the thread); has anyone thrown in the plausability that it may be an extraterrestrial anomaly?

If Marty Stubbs has got loads of footage of that type of stuff, why not from other sources (not sure if these photos are NASA or not).

So I ask: Why not an anomaly like we have seen in the NASA footage.
It may explain why we are scratching for answers here!
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^