Object near the Sun, seems to be heading toward the Sun, page 17
Pages: <<  14    15    16    17    18    19    20  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 75 times


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:03 PM by logicalview
reply to post by GezinhoKiko



I personally believe that due to the poor picture quality, it gives the impression that the object, which is Mercury, is 'tumbling' and also appears as two seperate objects.


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:11 PM by notreallyalive



reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:29 PM by frozenmonkey
reply to post by fleabit



I don't think they believe it will, their just asking what would happen if "something" were to hit the sun.



reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:35 PM by Essan
Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
reply to
post by Phage



so thats UK time then?


Currently its British Summer Time. Which is one hour ahead of Greenwich Mean Time/UHT


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:42 PM by Tank2/8
reply to post by questioningall



www.abovetopsecret.com...

I cannot find the thread about the 4inline sunspots. But I remember reading someones opinion that the 4inline could be from one massive amount of pressure below.

I am fairly new to this informative site. Most of the conspirasies and theorys I try to be skeptical and take with a grain of salt. The universe and the going ons of our solar system have been one of my favorite topics for several yrs.

There is a few threads here from some very intelegent people, the above link about solar flares, the particular sunspots.....now an object that may or maynot be heading for the sun. All coincidence or all tied to same outcome???


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:51 PM by frozenmonkey
reply to post by Elliot



Well, they have archives of past comets, so they do highlight them. Maybe the info is somewhere else on their website, or maybe they plan to add it in later. Or, maybe, if it is a comet, it's not going to hit the sun, but fly past it and so they don't mention it? Just some reasons that come to mind.


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:56 PM by Elliot
reply to post by frozenmonkey

But surely this is one MASSIVE comet if a comet is what it is?

How would you just 'let go' and not mention something that size?

It's planet size not comet size!


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 03:08 PM by GezinhoKiko
reply to post by no1dea



why do you want to close this thread? If it bothers you so much then just stay away from it.
peace

[edit on 3-7-2009 by GezinhoKiko]


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 03:23 PM by no1dea
Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
reply to
post by no1dea



why do you want to close this thread? If it bothers you so much then just stay away from it.
peace

[edit on 3-7-2009 by GezinhoKiko]


Because it's really not Mercury, but i was helping cover up


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 03:39 PM by N3krostatic
reply to post by Phage



Agreed entirely, but as we can both see people will believe what they want to even if it means counting out the plausible reasoning.

It is Mercury, Mercury, Mercury. How are you all going to feel when it passes as it always does and you were all so sure it was planet X? If I am wrong fine but I am doubtful I will be and this is just a prime example of people not entirely understanding something and attributing irrational ideas because of it.

Just because everyone can't figure out the logical explanation doesn't mean there isn't one.

Look at questioningall's post. It appears to be getting closer to the sun but in reality it is passing around it. If it were planet X with its elliptical orbit of 3600 years I think I can rationally assume it would not pass around the sun at the speed it has been, hence it's mercury.

Denying ignorance...


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 03:51 PM by N3krostatic
reply to post by Elliot



Maybe the real reason why NASA hasn't responded is because they have more important things to do than answer simple questions about regular orbiting planets where the information can be found by the individual?
Pages: <<  14    15    16    17    18    19    20  >>    ^^TOP^^