It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SugarCube
It is a giant leap to assume that Christian principles, as indicated in the Bible, are in anyway "absolute" and correct. I think that people may agree with you in terms of the "equated" theory but disagree with you on the supremacy of the Bible, taken as fact.
Why does everyone think I am Christian?
Originally posted by Good Wolf
reply to post by nj2day
I've not thought about it much like that before. Though I see a sort of unresolvable mutual exclusivity between Christianity and pan/deism.
Christianity requires the assumption that God has a plan in concordance with his lucid involvement in the Bible and him sending Jesus etc. But that all conflicts with those who believe in an unconscious naturalistic God.
Hmm. Food for thought.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
I severly doubt the ultimate structure of the expansion and collapse of universes has a conciousness.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Epicurus 340 - 270 BCE
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
I always tell people "we are in God's mind", literally.
[edit on 22-2-2009 by ALLis0NE]
..the idea of 'the universe being one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively' does have some merit (although this may detract from the abrahamic opinion of god being 'outside' and not 'inside').
Also,results in quantum M theory seem to indicating that the universe is the result of two other (parent) universes glancing off each other - this may also refute long held assumptions about monotheism..
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by jackflap
So why does god let innocent ethiopian children starve again? O yeah its probobly beacuse they didnt accept jesus and deserve to burn in hell after a long painfull death. Whew glad i reasoned that out like a good ignorant religous nut.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
reply to post by karl 12
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Epicurus 340 - 270 BCE
I'm so glad someone quoted that! Thanks Karl.
Originally posted by jackflap
Romans 8: 18For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by jackflap
I can only hope you get the buisness end of your broken logic. Maybe then youll wake up and get off your knees. I have a theory that religion is causeing genetic deformalitys that increse brain atraphy.