Originally posted by lernmore
See that's the big problem. You're trying to use data from the last 50 years which is completely laughable. Lookup "midevil warming period" and
you'll see that the earth was MUCH warmer than it is now. It must be those turbo-charged donkey carts responsible for that eh? (I stole that line
from another source)
Man, I was really trying not to get involved in this discussion. I recently had a rather lengthy back and forth about AGW in this thread;
www.abovetopsecret.com...
However, I could not resist.
You are dead wrong about the Medieval Warming Period. This period is better known in scientific circles as the Little Climactic Optimum. The problem
with using the MWP as a basis for Global Warming debunking is that the data used to develop the MWP theory is localized to Europe alone. Basically,
when making determinations about Global Temperature, it is necessary to have temperature records on a global scale. More accurate findings based on
ice core readings and tree ring studies on a global scale indicate that Global Temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period were in fact comparable
to the Global Temperatures present in the early to mid 20th century and thus, LESS than they are today. Essentially, the Medieval Warming Period is a
FARCE.
Originally posted by lernmore
Scientific data shows warming and cooling periods of 110,000 years and you're being "duped into believing that the last few years are more than
insignificant. The term Global Warming" isn't even being used as the fear phrase anymore, now it's "Climate Change".
You are correct about the cyclical nature of warming and cooling. However, what you are ignoring is that we also have records of global CO2 levels
from ice core readings. These CO2 level records also indicate a cyclical nature in Global CO2 concentrations (measured in PPM) that correlate with
cyclical temperature changes. The problem is, CO2 levels have NEVER been as high as they are TODAY (well, at least not for the last 650,000 years).
And, as previously stated by the OP, CO2 levels are expected to more than double over the next 100 years due to mans expansion in the use of fossil
fuels.
If the correlations between global temperatures and global CO2 concentrations continue to occur, CO2 concentrations more than twice as high as has
ever been known to exist will translate into temperatures far greater than we know to have existed.
Originally posted by lernmore
You see "green" this and "green" that everywhere you look, it's BIG business right now. Federally funded "scientists" are getting paid for
their "studies". If they don't have some life-ending, earth changing disaster that needs "more study" in the works, guess what? Their funding
dries up and they have to go looking for work. It's all about money, and it's all lies so they can squeeze more out of us in the form of a "Carbon
Tax".
Well, when "green" business accounts for even a fraction of the profits generated by the Oil, Coal, and other polluting industries you let me know.
Maybe then I will begin to recognize this conspiracy you are suggesting. Until then, I think I will feel confident that the only conspiracy present
is the massive amount of misinformation being created by the aforementioned global polluters intended to muddy the waters of this issue
(misinformation by the way that I believe you have swallowed hook, line, and sinker).
Originally posted by lernmore
Point 3...Along with the earth, the temperature of the other planets in our solar system is also rising, look it up.
I will agree with you that, if true, this is one of the more interesting ideas surrounding the AGW debate. I mean, obviously man is not affecting the
temperatures of every planet in our solar system. And, if the temperatures of other planets are increasing due to some yet to be fully understood
phenomenon, it stands to reason that the Earth's temperatures is also being affected by this phenomenon. I would expect to hear more about this
issue in the future.