It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thinkmore
@Jazket: Missiles work better in space than they do in earthly atmosphere. They require less fuel to launch, and do not have to put up with pesky air-friction. We probably cannot get them to travel at super-luminal speeds as the fuel requirements would be insane, but they would work well enough to be used as weapons.
Originally posted by Majorion
OK guys chill out,
Back on topic.. speaking of INTEL, my question is:
Is there any INTEL from this minister? like documentation or anything to back up his statement? .. a memo.. maybe even a top secret file?.. anything?
It seems he is a credible man.. certainly a man of high position no doubt.
There are far too many high ranking officials from all over the globe testifying to the reality of an extraterrestrial presence for all this to mean nothing.. they can't all be hoaxers can they? The most difficult part of this issue is determining who's telling the truth and who's not.
I'd like to know what the Bush administration's official position is toward this issue.
Originally posted by silver6ix
Peoples perception of the world comes from indoctrination at birth. Harsh as that may sound, im afraid its true. Because you were raised and indoctrinated with a belief that X is fantasy Y is fact, does not make it so.
Much of what you see in Media news is little more than fantasy, a presentation of images and sounds keyed to present the picture the person behind it chooses to present. That doesnt make it real, only a skewed presentation of what is real.
The history of humanity, its achievements and psychology doesnt prohibit in any way shape of form the belief or consideration of life beyond Earth.
Gallileo was the laughing stock of his peers and placed under house arrest for even daring to suggest something so brazenly rediculous and heretical. History teaches, but only to those who see with an open mind.
I twist nothing, i only point out that your perception to me is as much an illusion as you seem to feel others views are. Everything around you, society, structure, law, science is a lie my friend.
There is no more lack of logic in alien life than there was in under water life
The reason people cannot seperate the concept from fantasy is because
The issue is for you to overcome those semantic barriers and for you to open the box and see for yourself what is or isnt.
You might as well forget what the government and military tell you, the only statements they make are lies, on this subject and every other subject again, history makes that point very clear indeed.
Originally posted by silver6ix
Of all the many millions of intelligences on the planet we believe that the humanoid intelligence is the most advanced, maybe theres a reason for that.
Sentient Intelligence in a cucumber shape with no limbs, or with flippers hard survives logical challenge, it serves no greater pusporse and would be obsolete so why would it evolve?
No offence but Dolphins dont need to do maths and they dont build technology so why would their species ever need to evolve a human type intellect?
Originally posted by Interestinggg
Well I don't think Bush knows anything about any of this.
I think he would be the last one to know.
They would tell a chimpanzee before Bush.
Remember he is just a puppet to say yes no ok for the Military Industrial Complex.
Right now as I type G.W.Bush probably cant even remember exactly who or where he is.
Originally posted by Wisdom of one
The aliens every one is talking about could be more alien than you think. Yes this will sound very science fiction like, but meh.
The reason aliens are reported as being Humanoid in shape could have something to do with image projection, or a form of morphing. Again I know its far fetched idea.
For example a possible reason for them not reaching a full human copy could be to do with there physical limits in what they could morph to. Again just an idea I thought was worth asking
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by Geoff Capes
Yup, false flag coming soon..
And most people will probably fall for it...
Originally posted by jazket
I assume a missile is only useful within gravitational pull because we have not worked missile science on a zero-gravity space; I need some sort of scientific proof showing me how can they achieve a straight line towards a certain object, when the speed and trajectory of a projectile is calculated based on Earth's Gravity.
Originally posted by RedGolem
I have not read every post in this thread.
As far as a forward military base on the moon, I rather think it would be about worthless as a base from which to have military to attack other world invaders. A society capable of attacking this planet would centennially be capable of avoiding to moon when making the attack. So what use would having a defense base there really be?
Originally posted by Wisdom of one
As i have already asked is this America's reaction to 2012 and other such rumurs that we know of all to well???
Originally posted by silver6ix
reply to post by jephers0n
His father is probably one of the ringleaders. George Bush senior has ties into the very heart of all the conspiracy families, he was formed director of the CIA and was deeply involved in everything.
I VERY much doubt George Bush is in the dark about anything, not Cheney nor Rummy.
GB Junior might be a monkey but his family are deep in the midst of all the oldest suggested conspirators and while few president probably know, by birth right alone you could probably be 99.999999999% certain the Bush family are IN the loop and not out of it.
Originally posted by sdrawkcabII
All in all, I do know that they are preparing us for something. What I don't know, is if that's something good...or bad. I'll know soon enough it seems.
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by cbass
I think it was more aimed at Illegal Aliens from Iraq,Iran,Afganistan
Korea Invading Washington
Originally posted by Thinkmore
@Mopusvindictus: You are a very disturbed individual
Originally posted by serpentine
But Space 1999 is true ......... isn't it?
I am looking for a reference to a test missile that was sent by UK to the moon recently (I think 6-9 mnts back). It had a special ground penetrating head. The test was covered on MSM. It seemed like an odd test weapon. There was something about testing the requirements of a warhead that could penetrate the lunar crust.
Does anyone know more about this? I shall continue to search.
It seemed to me at the time to be very unusual. Most probably related to weaponising space.
Here the article link.
news.bbc.co.uk...
[edit on 29-10-2008 by serpentine]
Originally posted by silver6ix
The evidence very much points to the existence of life.
You take the official line but the officials who feed this line have been shown to have lied constantly on many issues. So, if you only believe the sources you choose to call credit then whovere speaks against them is never going to be viable to you.
There are many respected scientists across the world who have stated flatly that NASA have lied over many aspects of their work. Even this Mars landing seems to have fallen foul over the original "proof of life" which was discovered by their own lead scientists back in the 70's.
NASAs own team already discovered microbial life on Mars. After certain clandestine meetings however, NASA policy claimed a test by their equipment didnt validate it, however it was proven by testing the equipment in the arctic that it couldnt possibly have validated the claim. It wasnt capable. Again its suggested that they KNOW they is microbial life once again from this one, and it is being held back at the governments discretion.
NASA are liars, of this theres very little doubt the only question is how deep to the lies run and what else are they lying about. Time and time again they have been caught out lying.
Now if you choose to continue to accept the position of a deceitful organisation as your "proof" and take their call on credibility of anyone who questions them then how can you ever have proof of anything except what they tell you?
The only position allowed to be credible is their official position and im afraid as it stands you really need to be able to question some of the motives behind this. The science advisor to Clinton i believe said under oath that NASA lied as a matter of routine.
What lies beneath it all is open to speculation, but the fact they are lying is just a fact, they have been lying for a long time and that hasnt changed.
True science is a field of possibility, hypothesis and then testing. NASA science is a field of "what we say is" and any other hypothesis will not be tested or aknowledged. Its not science except maybe the science of deception.
[edit on 29-10-2008 by silver6ix]