It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by silver6ix
reply to post by populardisbelief
That was very interesting but I dont see your point? This isnt "public perception" we are talking about here.
What we are talking about that NASA by the admission of their own former personell, and a list of scientists both ex NASA and ex NASA sub contractors have clearly said that NASA have lied, on numerous occasions on numerous things. Now while you can easily dimiss them since NASA now claims anyone who questions NASA is not credible, im afraid the balance of information stands heavily against them.
NASAs word isnt worth anything because it is dictated to them under national security and upper tier control. NASA are not a free organisation, they do not deal in public truth, they deal in deception and everything of any note you will never see because its all classified.
Again its be stated and shown time and again but "credibility" apprently doesnt apply to person once they stop speaking with the NASA (NSA) voice. Thats the only problem here.
Originally posted by Old_One
I heard about this too. I am still having trouble with why people go so surprised over this kind of thing though. Yesterday's fantasy is today's reality. Seriously.
Humanity never "invents" anything.
Instead, humanity looks at something they before not seen, found no significance in, or utility and for whatever reason relevant to their time and era, begin to use it. It didn't invent flight. It looked at a bird and said, "I can copy that."
The Egyptians and some of the South Americans had flight well figured out.
It is good to remember too that there is a reason to say "ancient" Egyptians. They existed for 4000 years.
There's not a country today older than 400.
If something happens to happen close enough to it to be sensed it may take on something of that thing into itself but only for so long as that thing remains present and humanity can remember to. After that, humanity forgets and goes again into waiting for its next advantage.
Sure, Bush would do something as stupid as building a weapons platform on the moon. That's all it would be unless of course they might also like to use it to live through whatever disaster this planet is going to go through if humanity doesn't get a grip soon.
I remember reading somewhere that ... The last one was to leave the planet with those that could be taken and go elsewhere. This last was supposedly what the elite some fifty years ago have decided to do.
It would certainly explain alot of things.
Originally posted by gandaalf
Nice attempt at dodging the issue and jumping to yet something else without addressing the core issue.
The real issue here is that there is no proof of real aliens visiting us. It's that simple. Everything else is just some fluff that you throw to distract from answering the real question.
NASA wasn't even in the discussion until you brought it up.
Originally posted by gandaalf
Did you ever notice how people started talking about UFO abductions and visitations only recently, meaning in the last 100 years? War of the Worlds was written when, in 1898? Did you notice some of the original artwork for it? It reflected the technology that people had back then.
Now fast forward to movies about UFO saucers of the 1940s and 1950s. That's when people started seeing flying saucers. And how do they look? Just like the technology of that era.
Now we're talking about all sorts of exotic energy, and these UFO aircraft get progressively more and more advanced, in step with our own ideas.
Isn't that suspicious? It should be to any reasoning individual.
Originally posted by Geoff Capes
Explain to me the advantage of having a base on the moon.
Originally posted by silver6ix
Originally posted by gandaalf
Did you ever notice how people started talking about UFO abductions and visitations only recently, meaning in the last 100 years? War of the Worlds was written when, in 1898? Did you notice some of the original artwork for it? It reflected the technology that people had back then.
Now fast forward to movies about UFO saucers of the 1940s and 1950s. That's when people started seeing flying saucers. And how do they look? Just like the technology of that era.
Now we're talking about all sorts of exotic energy, and these UFO aircraft get progressively more and more advanced, in step with our own ideas.
Isn't that suspicious? It should be to any reasoning individual.
Thats a seriously flawed statement. Actually alien abductions go all the way back to the earliest civilisations. Many societies have stories of being "carried off by the gods" or "swept up in chariots to the sky". In fact almost every known culture which left us anything to read has some reference to this type of event, they also have reference to people from the skies, people coming down in craft or chariots from above. Everything we have no, was in ancient history long ago.
Some civilisations built their entire culture around such beliefs.
So no, its not suspicious because its not accurate and as a reasoning indivudual you should gather a deeper insight before making a judgment I feel.
The concept of life from other worlds, or from above, or coming down in strange craft has been around as long as civilisation itself. A reasonable person might suggest THAT is the strange coincidence.
Im sure the mayans, aztecs and egyptians for example didnt see War of the Worlds. The mayans knew astronomy inside out, and upside down well before their time.