It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Like I said SD, he's a living, breathing logical fallacy.
"Let he without sin cast the first stone"
Does the above phrase apply to insults as well? Are insults still considered sins?
I wonder what the sin ratio is for "insults" compared to "animal sex"???
Recognizing fallacies in actual arguments may be difficult since arguments are often structured using rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical connections between assertions. Fallacies may also exploit the emotional or intellectual weaknesses of the interlocutor. Having the capability of recognizing logical fallacies in arguments reduces the likelihood of such an occurrence.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Pointing out the use of, or the repeated use of logical fallacies isn't an "insult". It's calling a "spade" a "spade". If a person takes criticism as an "
insult", that is their fault, not the person pointing it out.
unreasonable
Main Entry:
un·rea·son·able Listen to the pronunciation of unreasonable
Pronunciation:
\-ˈrēz-nə-bəl, -ˈrē-zən-ə-bəl\
Function:
adjective
Date:
14th century
1 a: not governed by or acting according to reason b: not conformable to reason : absurd 2: exceeding the bounds of reason or moderation
Originally posted by miriam0566
argument is so stupid. all sin is equal and receives the same punishment. there is nothing anyone can bring to the table that will say this sin is worse than that sin. think different? then prove me wrong.
lets face it, this thread doesnt have a topic. this thread was made with the deliberate and intentional purpose slandering me.
gen 3:[17] And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
[18] Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
[19] In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
Originally posted by miriam0566
the way i always looked at it is that sin is going against god's will.
Originally posted by ScienceDada
I wasn't trying to undermine your argument, only to provide evidence as the "proof" you requested.
Originally posted by Freeborn
No-one ever stated that beastialty is ok.
Unmarried couple having sex is the same as a human having sex with an animal
Originally posted by Freeborn
There are however, people who believe that both acts should be punishable by death!
I despair for some people.
To the messenger of the church in Sardis, write: 'The one who has the seven spirits of God and the seven stars says this: 'I know what you've been doing. You are known for being alive, but you are dead
That if someone is having difficulty with the choice of sex with an animal versus premarital sex that perhaps their is a much larger issue at hand.
Sex with a human versus an animal? As you read this truly ask yourself. Animal? or Human? Hmm...Seems pretty iron clad to me.
Unmarried couple having sex is the same as a human having sex with an animal
Seems to me, that the OP has a difficulty making a distinction
Peace