It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scythia
Archaeological evidence seems to confirm the existence of Women-Warriors, as Sarmatian woman's active role in military operation and social life. Burial of armed Sarmatian women comprise about 25 percent of the military burial in the group, and are usually buried with bows.[10]
Russian archaeologist Vera Kovalevskaya points out that when Scythian men were away fighting or hunting, nomadic women would have to be able to defend themselves, their animals and pasture-grounds competently. During the time that the Scythians advanced into Asia and achieved near-hegemony in the Near-East, there was a period of twenty-eight years when the men would have been away on campaigns for long periods. During this time the women would not only have had to defend themselves, but to reproduce and this could well be the origin of the idea that Amazons mated once a year with their neighbors, if Herodotus actually intended to base this on a factual base.[10]
Before modern archaeology uncovered some of the Scythian burials of warrior-maidens entombed under kurgans in the region of Altay Mountains and Sarmatia,[11] giving concrete form at last to the Greek tales of mounted Amazons, the origin of the story of the Amazons has been the subject of speculation among classics scholars.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Wishing, hoping, and saying women are equal in a survival situation doesn't make it so. Name ONE society that rose above grass huts when it was run by women.
Originally posted by DuneKnight
reply to post by Chewlip
now im not a survivalist because lets face it those people are a bunch of crazies. in all seriousness though ur intention was to unite females so when situation x happens, females would group together to help each other against those mean bad men, right? well i got news for you i dont think women work well together to be honest, there is alot of backstabbing involved and generally women don't power or strengthen each other's abilities as much when men and women are grouped together; its a symbiotic relationship in civilization building and defending. from what i experienced even women would admit this, is that women shine best when confronted with challenges presented by the presence of men as well as creative exchange of ideas. and maybe women can at times add some common sense to men who would rather shoot ask questions later.
and ya maybe men survivalists are scary who knows what they are at but why would females want to be survivalists anyway? americans live in the richest country in the world yet they still carry alot of fear from the unknown, and you guys distrust the government for some reason. kinda thinking about what the OP said i must say it would be crazy risk to place a woman among all those men, survivalists or not.
Originally posted by Anuubis
This started out as a good thread but turned to sh!t fast!
Originally posted by DuneKnight
reply to post by Chewlip
so basically all this is meant for fun? well there u have it, thats the main difference between men survivalists and women 'aspiring' survivalists. men take it seriously as hell and do believe that what they learn would be used extensively in the near future certainly not their idea of fun.
Originally posted by Chewlip
I'd really like to go on a camping trip or something to learn/try out/test myself on whether i'd actually be able to survive. I've noticed a lot of males organising such things, and that's excellent, however, I'm a little hesitant about meeting a bunch of strange men from the internet and going somewhere isolated with them (no offence guys). So I thought starting a thread for females would be a good idea.
in all seriousness though ur intention was to unite females so when situation x happens, females would group together to help each other against those mean bad men, right?
Are the survial tactics that diffrent for the diffrent sexs? I mean, are you going to make tampons out of tree bark? Is that why this is for females only?
and ya maybe men survivalists are scary who knows what they are at but why would females want to be survivalists anyway?
Anyone who thinks women are not capable of doing and taking care of themselves obviously do not think much of them and are quite ignorant of human nature in general.
Originally posted by Chewlip
It wasn't my intention to turn this into a male vs female thread.
Nor was it to start an all-woman group.
Merely I thought to myself "I'd love to learn survivalism skills, but the thought of going into some isolated place with a bunch of males I don't know (even with some males I do know) where I was the only female would be rather intimidating to me." And I thought some women may feel the same, thus, getting in contact with each other could only be a positive thing. I don't think it's sexist at all, and I don't want to exclude males, just create some kind of community where women could discuss their ideas, and maybe meet up (with guys also) but to have the knowledge that thay will not be the only female.
I appreciate all the comments, but please, if you want to argue the difference between the sexes, start a new thread, because it is not the intention I had.