It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kyred
I don't understand about the president not allowed to be sued in a civil action. Didn't Bill Clinton get sued while a sitting president by Paula Jones? Just wondering.
Originally posted by hooptie
reply to post by LAUGHING-CAT
Upon reading this thread something clicked and I decided to type (rare, I extract my pleasure on here reading posts and ideas rather than debating or presenting my own). BUT, what if he really is intelligent and plays dumb. What IF he did order these attacks?
It really struck me funny that he could have everyone fooled--nearly everyone. It would stand to reason that not just any idiot can run for, and win the Presidency of the US. Has the world been played to the ultimate?
Originally posted by 888LetsRoll
I dont know how much more a free society can handle.. I guess thats what is going on here at ATS is to figure that question out. what are we the people going to do...?
Me, I have planned for self sustainiblity for 3 months total - 6 months financial.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
If he has proof of Bush ordering the attacks, why would he be suing for damages to the families? It would be treason at the highest level and they should be brought on trial for that, not sued for financial damages.
What is funny is that when I read the title, I thought "They could have video of Bush ordering the attack and still nothing would happen to him." and it sounds like the guy has a lot of evidence, yet... I still bet nothing will happen.
Originally posted by dariousg
In reading through this I found that it is very old...The case was not thrown out for lack of evidence. As stated in a post earlier it was thrown out because one cannot bring a civil suit against the president.