Excuse me for my better language, I'write from Genoa Italy
In my job I'make movie-video editor, photo images and other , working with digital-analog high hardware, this from 25 years .
On my analysis, the image of martian humanoid (female I'believe..) is really genuine, do not exist digital retouch or overlay of image.
This image is not rock or visual suggestion, for nothing, " she's " real, very very real...but my impression (too my wife assistance) is: this
humanoid is dead (we believe), as " petrified" or similar, naturally this is non sure, is only one impression.
If " she " is not dead, in this case NASA not say the complete truth..
About NASA truth, maybe the real atmosphere of Mars (already property of USA?) is different, not 78% of carbon dioxide, but a lot of Nitrogen and
oxygen. I' believe that the Mars climate is changing rapidly. Water, giant trees, green valley with (maybe) one river and others humanoids, skulls,
giant faces on rock, shells, ruins, piramids, patterns of buildings, ok... please, now stop
Why NASA not publish other photos about this umanoid?
You dont believe that NASA have other photos with minor distance with more details? I' believe...yes.
Always the same story, never photos to short ditance, face, eyes, lineaments..never.
In all cases, I' confirm one thing: on humanoid right side, is possible to see the right brest or something of similar. I' believe it's one brest.
For other analysis, for me the humanoid height is about 13-16 feets, very more high, respect earth humans.
I'm not sure, but if you can, look these other suspects at:
For the moment I'can't say nothing more
all the best
REPLY to SKUNK2 (next post): please, my Job is not " joke ", seriuosly.. ok? natural,I've seen the original image on NASA web site ( ! ).
I've edit the images from original panoramic image
[edit on 24-1-2008 by Genoa]