latest terror message (hanmannpi.com)

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
Good deduction, Nerdling. But I'm trying to get straight how much damage could really be done to Hoover with a cargo plane. I don't know, that's a big slab of concrete!

My gut leans toward multiple suicide bombers in casinos, but that's just my guess.

Either way, I'm glad we're thinking through this!


Yeah....what about Yucca mountain?

OR AREA 51?




posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:30 PM
link   
Today's date is 9-11 backwards!!
Redrum! Redrum!



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nerdling
Could the 36, 25, 36 be a possible time guide for the attacks, 36 hours after saudi the next one might hit, then 25 hours after that, and the last being at the same time as the first (36 hours after saudi)


Sounds like a woman's measurements to me!
Sorry...just offering a little levity.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:31 PM
link   


Today's date is 9-11 backwards!!


OH MY FERKIN GOSH! Quit it! I'm already wrapped tighter than a $2 watch!


[Edited on 9-11-2003 by Valhall]



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by straterx
For the less complex among us
IF you attack the USA
We Will Kill You
You = Radical Islam
If the innocent must die too thats to bad


I don't think it's necessary to say "You = Radical Islam". I'll kill anybody that attacks me...radical catholic, radical protestant, radical jew, radical atheist. Don't limit yourself buddy.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quicksilver
BUt sure the hoover damn would be good target for symolism and stuff but you would also have to plug in the human factor or the body count factor. I mean how many ppl would be killed im sure it would be a big fiscal loss for the country and take out alot of towns but the terrorist know that in the end we might be pissed about the loss of million and millions of dollars but we are a rich nation we recover they onw the only thing that really make us angry is the death of fellow americans especially on US soil. I think springers idea is laot more plausable. I know the security is there in casinos to moniter theft but how about the security to stop someone commin in with bombs strapped to them orinside of them. But still its vega its holds no politacal terrorism value like NYc, DC, or even LA. Part of me is sayin LA better look out but why would the terrorist wanna piss off some of there biggest supporters to the downfall of the USA. I hope we are all wrong tho. But i doubt itll be the 11th im thinkin the 13th


I think the US...at least those in power get just as pissed about the loss of dollars. I recognize that we lost a of people on 9/11...but they also interrupted trade and the stock market. I think they're symbolic strikes aren't just about our people...they're about our money and infrastructure. I think there's credence to these fears.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
I might point out the " fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams" from the latest Homeland Security release.

U.S. WARNS OF AL-QAIDA CARGO PLANE PLOT

November 9, 2003

The Associated Press reports: "The latest warning from the Homeland Security Department that al-Qaida may be plotting an attack is renewing calls for stricter security on cargo planes.

The department advised law-enforcement officials Friday night of threats that terrorists may fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams, Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.



What about that missing cargo plane which which was converted into a tanker? You know the 727 that someone stole right from under the flight controlers nose.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by energy_wave

Originally posted by Valhall
I might point out the " fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams" from the latest Homeland Security release.

U.S. WARNS OF AL-QAIDA CARGO PLANE PLOT

November 9, 2003

The Associated Press reports: "The latest warning from the Homeland Security Department that al-Qaida may be plotting an attack is renewing calls for stricter security on cargo planes.

The department advised law-enforcement officials Friday night of threats that terrorists may fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams, Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.



What about that missing cargo plane which which was converted into a tanker? You know the 727 that someone stole right from under the flight controlers nose.


Could you find an article or something on that, so we can make sure its documented please?



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Just another thing we should keep in mind...

Yes thats right folks! its our old buddy HAARP!

137.229.36.30...

Seems like they're also knocking out plenty of energy.

Look at the profile from the past 3 days, it seems they've been doing nothing but are suddenly pumping out a ton of energy, and didnt we say they never worked weekends?


I've also got one mother#er of a headache



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Here is a thread on the missing Boeing.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:58 PM
link   
seems to me there wont be any possible evaluations....no factual evidence right?

in my oppinion....hoover dam is a distraction? why say god will be hammering the U.S with water

BS!! wake up ppl....it's NYC+WDC AGAIN!!

nov. will be extremely bad for u guys' tho....
im glad the U.S.S.R is in friendly/neutral relations

*shrugs*

wait it out guys.....it's g2 happen sometime



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:03 PM
link   
I don't agree. I think the "Washington-New York-Los Angeles" comment has been a distraction and I believe that is a call to activate cells in those cities to "depart immediately" to perform their mission.

I think we may be on to something.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:04 PM
link   
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
I don't agree. I think the "Washington-New York-Los Angeles" comment has been a distraction and I believe that is a call to activate cells in those cities to "depart immediately" to perform their mission.

I think we may be on to something.


where'd u get ur coordinates from?



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.


For the sake of this thread and the board, I am going to assume this was not directed at me.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.


.......................................

Forgive us if we get a little into the discussion but we're putting things together, sometimes getting it wrong, but i'd rather not sit on my ass and wait for something to happen.

Constructive criticism is good, and what you said wasn't constructive. So give us something to work off, or shove a sock in it.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.

i am excited about them.....as a matter of fact, im fascinated

cant wait to c what the religious fanatics will do next, it's like the final drumbeat b4 the magician's finale

im sure this might irate some americans....but hey, oppinion,,,thats what we're all here 4



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:21 PM
link   
Nerdling,

I won't stuff a sock in it. I wasn't even talking to you. Ask yourself :

1. Do you seem excited about a terrorist attack?
2. Did I specifically say your name in my message?

If anything, you and Vahall are the only ones to do actual research. I respect that. Why get defensive when it's obviously not you I was talking to?



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishapscott
Nerdling,

I won't stuff a sock in it. I wasn't even talking to you. Ask yourself :

1. Do you seem excited about a terrorist attack?
2. Did I specifically say your name in my message?

If anything, you and Vahall are the only ones to do actual research. I respect that. Why get defensive when it's obviously not you I was talking to?


Dreadfully sorry then, i thought it was aimed at me.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 04:24 PM
link   
And if you need anything else to work off of...think about this.

The US is getting ready to deploy about 85,000 more troops to Iraq.

The US is getting ready for something big. US Planes have seen huge activity over the Scotland Area. Who is over in that area? Syria and Iran. Do you think these newly deployed troops are really for one of those states?





top topics
 
0
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join


ATS Live Reality Remix IS ON-AIR! (there are 95 minutes remaining).
ATS Live Radio Presents - Reality Remix Live SE6 EP8 - Season Finale!

atslive.com

hi-def

low-def