latest terror message (hanmannpi.com)

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quicksilver
Does LA, DC, or NYC have street names like 36th. ave. or 25th street?


Of course they do.




posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by EastCoastKid

Originally posted by Quicksilver
Does LA, DC, or NYC have street names like 36th. ave. or 25th street?


Of course they do.


Thens what on them.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 12:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quicksilver
BUt sure the hoover damn would be good target for symolism and stuff but you would also have to plug in the human factor or the body count factor. I mean how many ppl would be killed im sure it would be a big fiscal loss for the country and take out alot of towns but the terrorist know that in the end we might be pissed about the loss of million and millions of dollars but we are a rich nation we recover they onw the only thing that really make us angry is the death of fellow americans especially on US soil. I think springers idea is laot more plausable. I know the security is there in casinos to moniter theft but how about the security to stop someone commin in with bombs strapped to them orinside of them. But still its vega its holds no politacal terrorism value like NYc, DC, or even LA. Part of me is sayin LA better look out but why would the terrorist wanna piss off some of there biggest supporters to the downfall of the USA. I hope we are all wrong tho. But i doubt itll be the 11th im thinkin the 13th


Quicksilver. By definition, terrorism's primary purpose is to instill terror. The more high profile the damage, the more terror instilled. High body-count is icing on the cake...but the primary intent is the cake...not the icing.

I do not believe we should ever rule out a high profile target just because not very many people would die.

But also, on this note, go back and read Nerdlings posts, there are at least 3 towns/cities that would be completely wiped out if the Hoover Dam went. Laughlin is one of them.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 01:00 PM
link   
Consider this:

What if the "warning for brothers to leave Washington, New York and Los Angeles" is a call to action for three cells from those cities.

Don't know how large a cell is, but let's say there are five people in each one...that's 15 people if there is only one cell per city.

Setting aside the Hoover target, you could reek quite a bit of havoc on "sin city" if 15 suicide bombers hit 15 casinos!!! AND, virtually shut down Las Vegas's economy for a spell.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 01:03 PM
link   
But vegas does have appearance of all the american ways, and evils we permit. Much of what goes on in vegas, is outlawed in many arabic states. And what better way to get our attention, than take away our 'evil' fun.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 01:08 PM
link   
There won't be any terrorist attacks on November 11, or any time soon in the mainland US.

I say that with 100% confidence, and I don't personally know any terrorists, anywhere. Except for some elements of the Bush admin.

I have determined that the site quoted in the first post, that I have been monitoring for 9-10 months, is totally unreliable and I make that remark with all accompanying pomp and ceremony.

But don't take it from me. Live through 11 November and then you will see.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by smirkley
But vegas does have appearance of all the american ways, and evils we permit. Much of what goes on in vegas, is outlawed in many arabic states. And what better way to get our attention, than take away our 'evil' fun.


I agree with this reasoning.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Nothings gonna happen. They are scared and hiding now. Imagine what they would be should another big one go down.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by kramtronix
Nothings gonna happen. They are scared and hiding now. Imagine what they would be should another big one go down.


A whole lotta whiteboy jihad, thats what will go down.

Bush would have an excuse to expand the war on terror to Syria, Iran, and just about anyone whose not white of skin and christian in origin.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:09 PM
link   
Well Val i dont think it would be that good of a cake lol. I mean i see your reasoning i just dont think a vegas attack is plausible. But yet i still wouldnt be suprised if sometin happened.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:10 PM
link   
LOL That's a crock. "Whiteboy Jihad?" Let me guess, you're one of the nation's 1% that believes Bush actually planned 9/11.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by kramtronix
LOL That's a crock. "Whiteboy Jihad?" Let me guess, you're one of the nation's 1% that believes Bush actually planned 9/11.
.

Nope, I still think Al-Qaida did it.

The ignorance of the bush administration stopped them preventing it, he shoulda listened to us you know.

Deny Ignorance



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:32 PM
link   
Well, I don't subscribe to that theory. Sorry.

"Hello kettle? It's the cat. I just wanted to let you know that you're BLACK."



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:38 PM
link   
Okay, okay, okay. Let's not let this thread degenerate into arguments over opinions and theories connected with the administration.

I'm asking, PLEASE don't do that.

All I'm saying is that the numbers can be brought to the Vegas/Hoover coordinates, that's all. I don't believe ignoring that fact is logical.

Nothing may happen...let's pray for such, but we also need to be aware and informed, right?



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Sorry to use the thread this way, but **NERDLING** please check your u2us!!!



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 02:48 PM
link   
For the last few months I have heard rumors about the possiblity of attacks in november on either the 9th of november or the 11th. This seems to be somewhat real regarding the amount of calls I have recived on these threats. Time will tell but somthing tells me in light of the Opec Decision and russia and other countrys cutting off the United States oil starting january 2004 that we are going to have a incident shortly.

Falcon



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by falcon
Time will tell but somthing tells me in light of the Opec Decision and russia and other countrys cutting off the United States oil starting january 2004 that we are going to have a incident shortly.

Falcon




I find that really interesting. Can you define the "something" that tells you?

Is it inductive or deductive reasoning?
Is it the Bush admin's terror campaign working on you?
Is it psychic ability?

When nothing has happened on November 9 or November 11, why not return and let us know what it was about the"something" that failed you.

Not to pick holes, but instead to try to improve how intelligence is used.

Or maybe, as has been commented on in other threads, the "game" of anticipating tragedy and loss of human life is the fun that people at ATS seek.

How can you possibly sit here and say that terrorist attacks are going to occur anywhere in the mainland US in the next three days, and still profess any faith in the incumbent administration, at all?

That is mind-boggling.

[Edited on 9-11-2003 by MaskedAvatar]



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:02 PM
link   
I might point out the " fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams" from the latest Homeland Security release.

U.S. WARNS OF AL-QAIDA CARGO PLANE PLOT

November 9, 2003

The Associated Press reports: "The latest warning from the Homeland Security Department that al-Qaida may be plotting an attack is renewing calls for stricter security on cargo planes.

The department advised law-enforcement officials Friday night of threats that terrorists may fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams, Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:17 PM
link   
got that u2u val.
I cant believe that happened

Still nothing on my side.

Ok, Mexico is near Nevada so they could probably fly a cargo plane in from there, right out in the desert i doubt they secure the landing strips, if you keep low enough you could avoid radar and every population centre, being that close to the border also gives the air defence forces very little time to react, it takes 15 minutes to get a fighter ready, and more in most cases, 30 is the standard alert.

Load a cargo plane with home made explosives and you've got one mother#er of a bomb.



posted on Nov, 9 2003 @ 03:19 PM
link   
Good deduction, Nerdling. But I'm trying to get straight how much damage could really be done to Hoover with a cargo plane. I don't know, that's a big slab of concrete!

My gut leans toward multiple suicide bombers in casinos, but that's just my guess.

Either way, I'm glad we're thinking through this!





new topics
top topics
 
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join