It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
GE 1:31 God was pleased with his creation.
GE 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation.
(Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience.)
10 Then celebrate the Feast of Weeks to the LORD your God by giving a freewill offering in proportion to the blessings the LORD your God has given you.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
SPAM-
Originally posted by Spamandham
but the average teenie bopper hanging around on Christian forums has nothing to offer. They are not there to learn or to teach, but to reinforce one another.
Could you please elaborate on this? I have already learned so much from you, Saint and Jake.
GE 2:4, 4:26, 12:8, 22:14-16, 26:25 God was already known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) much earlier than the time of Moses.
EX 6:2-3 God was first known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) at the time of the Egyptian Bondage, during the life of Moses.
2And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD:
3And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
Jehovah
Another name for God; an approximation of the holiest name of God in Hebrew (the name was held so sacred that it was never written or spoken, and scholars are not sure exactly how it should be pronounced). It means “I am that I am,” or “I am the one who is.” In the incident of the burning bush in the Book of Exodus, God, speaking out of the bush, tells Moses that this is his name.
so the catholic church now believes some of the bible may not be truth, as it does hold innacuracies. crystalsword, who is a christian also thinks the bible is flawed and innacurate. for something that is being accepted as flawed and innacurate, doesn't half have a lot of people living by it.
Originally posted by TheCrystalSword
Excuse me? I may say I am "SORT OF" a christian... but I am more a Gnostic/Dualist and a flavor of my own beliefs.
GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit.
GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years.
17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."
5 Altogether, Adam lived 930 years, and then he died.
GE 2:15-17, 3:4-6 It is wrong to want to be able to tell good from evil.
HE 5:13-14 It is immature to be unable to tell good from evil.
But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
I'm just wondering what you mean as being a dualist. I have found that Gnosis is to break free from dualism, from the opposites, where things just ARE, and not judged.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
christian see these as not a big deal (but insist on defending them), but athiests usually do think it is..as to them it proves god doesn't exists, or the likelyhood is less.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
it's a bit stupid to try and prove, and even to defend that the bible does or doesn't have any innacuracies. it's pretty much a fact that it does have many. there are a vast amount on that website...sure you can get out of a few with some technicalities, but matter of fact there are still innacuracies. the only problem is that christian see these as not a big deal (but insist on defending them), but athiests usually do think it is..as to them it proves god doesn't exists, or the likelyhood is less.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
it's a bit stupid to try and prove, and even to defend that the bible does or doesn't have any innacuracies.
so you could go on arguing all day about these innacuracies, but you'll never come to a conclusion.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
How does a book with historical innacuracies reinforce your concept of there not being a God?
If I made a religion, which praised God, and in our revered book "The Akashic Records", there were 100 historical innacuracies, I do not think I would have too many people convert to Atheism because of it...
If indeed the bible has many innacuracies, then you can say it was not written by God through people, but rather through misinformed people, and as such any innacuracies within it should not reinforce beliefs of there being no God.
Originally posted by spamandham
I assume you did not raise yourself on a deserted island. Even if you had no religious upbringing, you have been inundated with god talk your entire life from the society around you. Assuming you grew up in the US or UK, you have also been immersed in Christian culture. There's no way you found him personally. You simply adopted the predominant meme of the society around you.
Originally posted by gps777
There are other countries in the world besides the US and UK,Australia for one though you could be right if you assumed that Australia is a desert Island
Originally posted by gps777
Its you with the faith problem in this area.
Originally posted by gps777
Also to assume again in your opinion(though you did`nt state it as being such)that" there`s no way i could have done this personally"so you dont believe in originality as well?
Originally posted by gps777
I believed and believe that God sent His Son to die for me,and because of that he revealed Himself to me in a physical and spiritual sense,i could`nt deny this if i wanted to,
Originally posted by spamandham
There is no discordance between my professed belief in gravity and my actions, because I honestly, truly believe in gravity.
Originally posted by TheCrystalSword
I'd love to hear if you think the terms "Trash", "Inaccurate" and "Flawed" mean the same thing and how the latter two are less offensive than the first when referring to holy books.
Originally posted by TheCrystalSword
I'd love to hear if you think the terms "Trash", "Inaccurate" and "Flawed" mean the same thing and how the latter two are less offensive than the first when referring to holy books.
Main Entry: 1trash
Pronunciation: 'trash
Function: noun
Etymology: of Scandinavian origin; akin to Norwegian trask trash; akin to Old Norse tros fallen leaves and twigs, Old English trus
1 : something worth little or nothing: as a : JUNK, RUBBISH b (1) : empty talk : NONSENSE (2) : inferior or worthless writing or artistic matter; also : such material intended purely for entertainment
Main Entry: in•ac•cu•rate
Pronunciation: -'a-ky&-r&t, -k(&-)r&t
Function: adjective
: not accurate : FAULTY
Main Entry: 2flaw
1 a : a defect in physical structure or form b : an imperfection or weakness and especially one that detracts from the whole or hinders effectiveness
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Originally posted by TheCrystalSword
I'd love to hear if you think the terms "Trash", "Inaccurate" and "Flawed" mean the same thing and how the latter two are less offensive than the first when referring to holy books.
Before I answer that, may I ask, why?
I contend that Trash has an entirely different etymological meaning than inaccurate and flawed. I referred to the bible as inaccurate and flawed, another contended I was just saying it is trash. Mostly because they felt it was trash.
As far as I'm aware, one is meant to convey no worth, the others are generally critical but not dismissive.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
How does a book with historical innacuracies reinforce your concept of there not being a God?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
If I made a religion, which praised God, and in our revered book "The Akashic Records", there were 100 historical innacuracies, I do not think I would have too many people convert to Atheism because of it...
Originally posted by junglejake
As I said in one of those posts, if my logic is inaccurate, please point it out, but do so specifically, as I obviously didn't think of it when I wrote it.
Originally posted by junglejake
So I don't see it as a fact that there are inaccuracies yet. I don't think I ever will.
Originally posted by junglejake
What really baffles me, though, is why you think it is stupid for me to address them.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Originally posted by spamandham
There is no discordance between my professed belief in gravity and my actions, because I honestly, truly believe in gravity.
Talking about gravity...
What is it?