It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spamandham
Sorry Saint, but the Bible itself indicates the nature of the slaves of Hebrews. Slavery didn't simply mean "compensated servant" as apologists like to claim. Go read Exodus 21. If slaves were not beaten, then why were special regulations needed to deal with the beating of slaves?
Originally posted by spamandham
Oh great, now we're pulling in Jewish apologetics sites as well. I understand that slavery was part of that culture, just as it was part of US culture 150 years ago. Were the Jews better masters than the surrounding cultures? Who knows, maybe archaeology will figure that out some day.
Originally posted by spamandham
But the 10 Commandments are claimed to be more than just the laws of ancient Hebrew culture, they are claimed to be the commands of god himself.
Originally posted by spamandham
Yes and no. Females and children were also taken as slaves as spoils of war. The children of slaves became the property of the master as well. These facts are told us by the Bible itself.
Originally posted by spamandham
I agree that desiring that which you can not obtain legitimately is a self destructive, although making it a capital offense is pretty rediculous.
Originally posted by spamandham
The real problem I have with #10 is it's sanctification of slavery. #10 and similar passages from the Bible were used to justify American slavery.
Originally posted by spamandham
And guess what, the Bible hasn't changed since then. The Bible still condones slavery even though our culture has moved beyond it. You will not find a single passage in the Bible that condemns slavery, but you will find numerous passages that support it. This fact alone should be enough to convince a skeptic that those books are not the word of god.
Interestingly enough, my non-Christian friends don't see a problem, don't recognize that I'm going through a tough time, and I tend to hide it even more deeply in front of them.
Originally posted by junglejake
4 "You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them;
Why do you wear those symbols? Do you wear them because you worship Ra? Because you like to cause a reaction in others? How would you react if they were stolen, would you view it as loss of finances, or something very personal? If you know that they depict Ra, or a symbol or Ra, what is it you're proclaiming by wearing them?
I will grant you that, if we as Christians believed other religions were right, as well, it would be ignorance to not know them.
However, if we believed Christianity was the one true religion, as the Bible states in many places, would it not be foolish to turn away from it and seek other false Gods, against this commandment?
Originally posted by junglejake
shaunybaby, you've been here for a while. I'm assuming you've read many of my posts here on this thread and others where you've replied. You know I didn't come to believe in Christ "because it said so." "It" opened my eyes to God's existence, and opened my heart to the possibility, but it was only after 4 years of non-Biblical research that I came to a conclusion that Jesus is my savior. Call that ignorance if you'd like, but just be honest in the reason for your appraisal of me.
Originally posted by junglejake
You both are forgetting one critical piece of information. The Year Of Jubilee. Every seven years, the Jews were required to release all of their slaves,
Originally posted by junglejake
If you enslaved someone a year before Jubilee, you only got one year of their services; the year after, seven years. There was an end in sight, though.
Originally posted by junglejake
The logic lies in confirming that Christianity is correct.
Therefore, what reason would we have to dismiss segments of the Bible that don't fit in the "wise" culture that accepts everything as true?
Originally posted by junglejake
Let me see, then, if I have this right. You're telling us that we should accept your philosophy, or we're ignorant. In your philosophy, you're telling us our religion is wrong, and we must accept your philosophy, otherwise we're being ignorant. Is that the gist?
Originally posted by saint4God
I am currently a slave and receive a bi-weekly paycheck because of it. People here get no say, liberty and freedom in their time here (unless they have one of those 'special' positions such as King...er...I mean President)
Originally posted by spamandham
Oh great, now we're pulling in Jewish apologetics sites as well. I understand that slavery was part of that culture, just as it was part of US culture 150 years ago. Were the Jews better masters than the surrounding cultures? Who knows, maybe archaeology will figure that out some day.
Originally posted by saint4God
Hehe, I don't care what is 'apologetic' and what is not.
Originally posted by saint4God
Humans can justify anything, often do, and typically when they're wrong. If it's right, there's no need to justify anything.
Originally posted by spamandham
And guess what, the Bible hasn't changed since then. The Bible still condones slavery even though our culture has moved beyond it. You will not find a single passage in the Bible that condemns slavery, but you will find numerous passages that support it. This fact alone should be enough to convince a skeptic that those books are not the word of god.
Originally posted by saint4God
How about Paul's writing to Philemon? Onesimus owed a great debt and by every legal right was to work it off as a slave.
Originally posted by junglejake
hehe, well, my point is that Christianity does say it is the only true religion. You're telling me to accept others, as well. That is in direct contradiction of Christianity. Therefore, you're telling me to abandon my religion and accept yours.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
i didn't say that you had to accept mine. i don't have a religion. and yes that is what i've been saying all along 'christians believe they are the one true religion, and the rest are satanic frauds'. that's my whole point about you and christians being ignorant. i didn't say you had to believe in what i believe, i want to know 'why are you being ignorant, and why do you feel the need to follow christianity so closely, yet not as closely as they would have done 500-1000 years ago'?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
i didn't say that you had to accept mine. i don't have a religion. and yes that is what i've been saying all along 'christians believe they are the one true religion, and the rest are satanic frauds'. that's my whole point about you and christians being ignorant. i didn't say you had to believe in what i believe, i want to know 'why are you being ignorant, and why do you feel the need to follow christianity so closely, yet not as closely as they would have done 500-1000 years ago'?
Although I was raised Christian, when you leave home, you finally decide whether or not to continue with it. I continued with it for another ~20 years. I had all the "personal experiences" the rest of you have, and in my own mind I truly believed I believed. But just like (almost?) everyone else, my actions proved I didn't really believe.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Trying to instill your philosophy of the acceptance of all earthly doctrines, into another person, is very much like trying to instill a religion on another person. If you want Christians to not force their religion on you, and respect your views, you must respect theirs.
If the Christian doctrine includes the notion that all other doctrines are subordinate, then you should respect that, and have no right to call the doctrine, and the followers thereof ignorant.
Originally posted by junglejake
Why do you believe scripture wasn't followed so closely 500-1000 years ago?
Also, why is it just Christianity exclusively, when Islam and Judaism feel the same way?
Originally posted by junglejake
By the way, shaunybaby's not forcing anything on anyone. He's explaining what he sees as right, and believes people who don't feel that way are ignorant. It is understandable, I just don't know if calling people names will get them to abandon their own beliefs in favor of his.
Originally posted by just me 2
There once was a young child and a parent that was cooking something on a hot stove. The parent says to the child, "Don't touch the stove Johnny, it is very hot and you'll get burned if you do."
The child believes his mom, but that pretty orange colored stove is so irresistable that he touched it anyways.
He now doesn't just believe the stove is hot, he KNOWS it beyond the shadow of a doubt.
that just shows human's curious nature. i've done that too. i still do it while the electric pad on the cooker is heating up...i wanna see how quick it heats up. got nada to do with god. as for the rest of the thread
are you trying to prove to us that god exists because you say so? maybe you have become so religious because you feel guilty about your sins and all the bad things you've done in your life, and feel somehow you need to be guided to be kept away from that?
Originally posted by junglejake
Woah...Where in the Bible does it tell us to kill others in a universal manner? I know there were specific incidences in the Old Testament when the Jews were taking and retaking Israel, but I'm unaware of the passage (in context) that talks about killing those who do not believe in Christ...