Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This is ridiculous. Is it common for FBI to dictate what an agent can and cannot say during a congressional oversight hearing?

Only because they are hiding the fact the FBI colluded with Team CLinton to rig the last election.

Logic would dictate that it's ACTUALLY about not wanting to give away details of active investigations - NOT the nonsense you lot come up with.

Why would an active investigation on Russian collusion include both Clinton and Trump?

Logic would infer there is a connection if he cant talk about either.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This is ridiculous. Is it common for FBI to dictate what an agent can and cannot say during a congressional oversight hearing?

It shouldn't be. If congress had any balls they would defund their asses tomorrow till they get the cooperation they are entitled too.

originally posted by: proximo
Nobody is scared of Mueller finding anything related to Russia - because there is nothing to find. Only seriously ignorant brainwashed dummies still believe there is any real Russian collusion. All Mueller is doing now is fishing for something - anything to get Trump. He will fail.

Nothing to find? You know this for sure do you? You must have seen Muellers files - do tell us all what they say.....

You are desperate. Trump says "No collusion" and you lot jump into line like good little soldiers - because no guilty person has EVER said "I didn't do it" have they?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

a reply to: carewemust

So I guess all the altered and manufactured evidence will be presented when the investigation is over.
You'll hold it up saying yep this is what he did. And trump will get re-elected and the sun will shine and birds will sing.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: savagediver

She never lied to the FBI

How would we know that considering the fact that none of her evidence is actually recorded?

Do you even think before you write?

I say give Gowdy the compound time of the republicans and Strzok will have a nervous breakdown

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

originally posted by: neo96
RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

Of course, the greatest irony is the DNC stole the election from the left.

*wavy* *wavy* Bernie supporters. It could have been fun.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?

a reply to: Kryties

Collusion was shown.

By Team Clinton.

Steele/Orb

FBI.

MEDIA.

DNC convention where FOREIGN NATIONALS electioneered for Team LEFT.

The DOSSIER paid for Team left that was just proven given to the FBI.

RIGG PRIMARY where the nomination was stolen from Sanders. Sander supporters were pissed off. So team left built a wall around it.

And this farce has gone on for TWO EFFING YEARS.

With TEAM left throwing ever red herring fallacy they can think of today

Get off it.

a reply to: Jonjonj

selective hearing

very selective

maybe a bit..... bias

Those texts and emails he wrote do seem to display bias though.
a reply to: Sillyolme

a reply to: proximo

It shouldn't be. If congress had any balls they would defund their asses tomorrow till they get the cooperation they are entitled too.

Right. I mean, congressional oversight is one of the cornerstones of the separation of powers and representative democracy.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?

that's the problem with some people they don't know and don't listen and don't even try to understand

a reply to: loam

No the one before his last. He was trying to remember events that had taken place five years prior. He never failed a polygraph in case you decide to go there.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: The GUT

Sounds to me as if they were pulled briefly at least for "circumstances." Which would probably mean internal sham investigation of him that concluded quickly I'm guessing.

You make up this...
Then decide it's scary

You make up all sorts of stuff. Now you're calling someone else on it?

originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: Jonjonj

selective hearing

very selective

maybe a bit..... bias

Surely not biased, perhaps just a political leaning?

a reply to: Sillyolme

He never failed a polygraph in case you decide to go there.

One of the many purposes of those polys.

Is to find out if they are compromised.

Strzok was cheating.

Which could have been used for blackmail.

Never failed?

I say they failed big time.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: Jonjonj

selective hearing

very selective

maybe a bit..... bias

Surely not biased, perhaps just a political leaning?

Perhaps..

Thankfully it hasn't influenced his actions...