Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

Anyone know how long this recess will be?

a reply to: Wookiep

They said 45 mins. That is DC time though so your guess is a good as mine.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: proximo
Nobody is scared of Mueller finding anything related to Russia - because there is nothing to find. Only seriously ignorant brainwashed dummies still believe there is any real Russian collusion. All Mueller is doing now is fishing for something - anything to get Trump. He will fail.

Nothing to find? You know this for sure do you? You must have seen Muellers files - do tell us all what they say.....

You are desperate. Trump says "No collusion" and you lot jump into line like good little soldiers - because no guilty person has EVER said "I didn't do it" have they?

Do you believe Strzok when he said "I'm concerned there's no there there"?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: loam

No the one before his last. He was trying to remember events that had taken place five years prior. He never failed a polygraph in case you decide to go there.

I have a question about that. Wasn't he subject to a poly at all during his own investigation?

On June 15, 2018, the day after this IG report was published, Strzok was escorted from FBI headquarters as part of the bureau's internal conduct investigations.[36] The move put Strzok on notice that the bureau intends to fire him, though he has appeal rights that could delay such action.[37] On June 21, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said that Strzok had lost his security clearance

From wikipedia: Peter Strzok

I am just wondering if there was actually an investigation and how thorough the investigation was.

a reply to: Wookiep

Probably long enough to figure out how to backtrack Strzoks last comments about dossier.

originally posted by: Wookiep
Anyone know how long this recess will be?

long enough for his counsel to tell him "you're doing great, keep deflecting and pleading you really want to answer that question".

a reply to: Wookiep

not long enough.

(no, i dont know)

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?

"Collusion" covers a variety of areas, one being that it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from foreign nationals, another being that if the Russians hacked emails that then can be proven to have been used by Trumps team then that is also illegal. That's just two of many ways "collusion" can happen.

You can feel free to check these things yourself then come back and explain why you ignored them? Also, can the other poster who replied to you explain why they ignore these facts also?

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: proximo
Nobody is scared of Mueller finding anything related to Russia - because there is nothing to find. Only seriously ignorant brainwashed dummies still believe there is any real Russian collusion. All Mueller is doing now is fishing for something - anything to get Trump. He will fail.

Nothing to find? You know this for sure do you? You must have seen Muellers files - do tell us all what they say.....

You are desperate. Trump says "No collusion" and you lot jump into line like good little soldiers - because no guilty person has EVER said "I didn't do it" have they?

Seriously? You are trying to convince me Mueller has super secret Russian info - when his operation was leaking constantly in the beginning about every stupid supposed bit of evidence like the Trump Jr. meeting, the sessions being in the room with the Russian ambassador, Papadoplous, the meeting with Eric Prince etc, etc.

This is the same investigation that is based off the POS dosier that nobody has been able to confirm anything about despite spending millions of dollars and countless investigators trying to confirm anything in it and failing. This is the investigation based off a Clinton associate's hearsay of a low level Trump campaign official supposedly making some remark about Russia having some Hillary emails.

Mueller's indictment of the 10 or whatever Russian troll farm dudes has been a spectacular blunder, he is trying like hell to delay the trial with them because he has no evidence. It was all for show.

The DOJ did everything in it's power to hide that Hillary and the DNC paid for the Dosier, they did everything in their power to hide the FISA warrants on Carter Page. Carter Page by the way is free as a bird and obviously did nothing wrong.

The entire investigation is based on NOTHING. But you somehow think Mueller has pulled some Russian wrongdoing out his butt - based on what?? Your hatred of Trump and media brainwashing - because there is no other reason to believe it at all, and much more evidence to believe it was all a paid frame up job by Hillary and the Democratic party.

originally posted by: Wookiep
Anyone know how long this recess will be?

I'm having my Texas chille and onion rings from my own restaurant and waiting for the commence so just chill

it's late at night here

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: proximo
Nobody is scared of Mueller finding anything related to Russia - because there is nothing to find. Only seriously ignorant brainwashed dummies still believe there is any real Russian collusion. All Mueller is doing now is fishing for something - anything to get Trump. He will fail.

Nothing to find? You know this for sure do you? You must have seen Muellers files - do tell us all what they say.....

You are desperate. Trump says "No collusion" and you lot jump into line like good little soldiers - because no guilty person has EVER said "I didn't do it" have they?

Do you believe Strzok when he said "I'm concerned there's no there there"?

I take the use of the word "concerned" to be the operative word in that sentence. "Concerned" DOES NOT EQUAL "absolute proof" no matter how much you want it to.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?

"Collusion" covers a variety of areas, one being that it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from foreign nationals, another being that if the Russians hacked emails that then can be proven to have been used by Trumps team then that is also illegal. That's just two of many ways "collusion" can happen.

You can feel free to check these things yourself then come back and explain why you ignored them? Also, can the other poster who replied to you explain why they ignore these facts also?

I know all this, why do you feel the need to enlighten me about it?

The facts are that "collusion" as stated doesn't actually exist, so feel free to check that out and explain why you ignored that.

a reply to: proximo

They are only leaking what they want you to know and what won't affect their investigation, unless the leak helps them. Just because they haven't leaked any info on the Russia investigation DOES NOT MEAN they don't have anything as you clearly desperately want to believe.

Until Mueller SPECIFICALLY says he does or doesn't have anything YOU CANNOT KNOW and CANNOT SAY that there is nothing. All you are doing is repeating Trump, and no guilty person ever said "I didn't do it" now did they?

a reply to: Kryties

Dragons!!

Here we go!!!

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sillyolme

The joke is Strzok.

The joke is your political system.

Let me guess....nothing new will be achieved or learned from this testimony.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe

An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.

The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.

RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.

You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.

Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?

"Collusion" covers a variety of areas, one being that it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from foreign nationals, another being that if the Russians hacked emails that then can be proven to have been used by Trumps team then that is also illegal. That's just two of many ways "collusion" can happen.

You can feel free to check these things yourself then come back and explain why you ignored them? Also, can the other poster who replied to you explain why they ignore these facts also?

I know all this, why do you feel the need to enlighten me about it?

The facts are that "collusion" as stated doesn't actually exist, so feel free to check that out and explain why you ignored that.

So you know for certain that Trump or his team didn't accept donations from foreign nationals do you? You know for certain that Trump or his team never directly used any information Russia may have provided to them after having hacked it? You know these things FOR CERTAIN do you?

How? Did Mueller tell you or are you just listening to Trump and blindly believing it because "Trump said so"?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

So what actions did he take to put his bias into play? Because these texts were private. They weren't published for the consumption of others to sway opinions nor were the opinions spread through the investigation at all so maybe you can explain how these private opinions were used to alter or effect or inhibit what ever action you attribute to them, the campaign or trump. In your own words. lol

The fact that they weren't published for consumption of others to sway opinions is exactly proof enough that the actors actions reflect his personal private belief. Whether you understand how his actions correlate is absolutely irrelevant to his private motivations and under the table intent.

A liar will tell the truth in private but will deny and deflect in public. Don't be so naive.

From "I did nothing wrong" to "I am so sorry" in the same breath.
Really?

So Clinton can pay a foreign national(Steele) for dirt on Trump, and that's fine.

Trump can't.

Effing HYPOCRISY!