It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wookiep
originally posted by: neo96
Richmond is trolling.
Classic left..
I don't know why these certain dems are even there. They clearly can't and won't stick to the subject. They also appear to think its a waste of time. Why are they even there? They're not asking valid questions, they just keep talking about kids and immigration
What a damn disgrace these people are.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
what bothers me is that republicans are yielding time to mate's when the democrats are yielding their time to Strzok and that's alarming
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: Kryties
They can think its a waste of time all day. Bitching about it only makes it take longer.
They have a right to be there, but clearly they don't want to be there. They're just wasting time.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Dr UAE
what bothers me is that republicans are yielding time to mate's when the democrats are yielding their time to Strzok and that's alarming
The Republicans keep asking Strzok questions and making comments to him and not giving him a chance to respond, instead they just talk over him for some of it. The Democrats are simply giving Strzok the opportunity to respond where the Republicans wouldn't. They even specifically said that, why do you ignore this?
originally posted by: SRPrime
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Vasa Croe
An 'active investigation' where no american citizen has been indicted to or plead guilty to Russian Collusion.
The ones they got are for white collar crimes UNRELATED to the premise of this snip show.
RUSSIAN STOLE the election from the left.
You conveniently forget that the investigation is ongoing and collusion may yet be shown - DESPITE what Trump says about "No collusion". Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. - something you seem to need reminding of.
Collusion isn't a crime, did you not hear Strzok say that today?
"Collusion" covers a variety of areas, one being that it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from foreign nationals, another being that if the Russians hacked emails that then can be proven to have been used by Trumps team then that is also illegal. That's just two of many ways "collusion" can happen.
You can feel free to check these things yourself then come back and explain why you ignored them? Also, can the other poster who replied to you explain why they ignore these facts also?
Wrong. If Trump accepted money from foreign nationals, they wouldn't call it collusion, they'd call it accepting money from foreign nationals, and if they could prove it, they would have already charged him and started impeachment proceedings.
Wrong again, it's never illegal to use public domain information. It doesn't matter the source if it's public. It only matters the source when the information is private. Being as WE ALL have access to those emails and can read them our selves, it's absolutely not illegal in anyway. That's not collusion, that's just not willfully ignoring public domain information.
As you can see, you've actually listed 0 information that has any illegal implication against the president. Mind you again, I didn't even vote -- because I don't like Trump or Hillary, but so far; it's a complete witch hunt on Trump. I'd also like to point out, that I read in September here on ATS, a topic from a Democratic leaker that said if Hillary lost, the game plan would be to blame russian hackers and to tie up Trumps presidency with a phony investigation into collusion. This was the September BEFORE the election, and this is EXACTLY what happened.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Dr UAE
what bothers me is that republicans are yielding time to mate's when the democrats are yielding their time to Strzok and that's alarming
The Republicans keep asking Strzok questions and making comments to him and not giving him a chance to respond, instead they just talk over him for some of it. The Democrats are simply giving Strzok the opportunity to respond where the Republicans wouldn't. They even specifically said that, why do you ignore this?
I beg to differ as an outsider, looks to me the republicans are trying to get answers from a legitimate questions when the other side are giving speeches
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Kryties
Ohhhhh... So NOW its a witch hunt?
You guys are hillary-ous.
Keep trying to deflect mate, we are all aware of what’s really happening by that point.
You’re just wasting your time here.
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: Kryties
You can think it's a farce if you want, but I think your (and dems) deep desire to see Trump impeached is very seriously clouding your judgement.