It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

page: 61
66
<< 58  59  60   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2018 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: TheRedneck

I have nothing against porn, whatsoever

You say this with a straight face?
And then:


That is why I disparage Stormy Daniels: her poor character. Her choice of venue is simply an indicator of that poor character and she has since becoming infamous showed that it is a good indicator.

I seriously wish this was happening in another thread :-)


No, you should be more careful who you hitch your wagon to. Daniels is not a rising star... she is a falling chunk of rock. You should try to see the difference.

I'll worry about my honor Redneck and where I hitch my wagon - I'll leave you to judge people however you see fit

You don't seem to be very objective . I'm mostly interested in this idea you have that you can detect dishonesty in a person based on where people fall on your naughtiness meter. Ms Daniels is a dirty girl - low class - making movies you seem to like in an industry you support. So, because of this - she is automatically a liar?


I do. Part of that is minding who I do and do not look up to. If one lies down with dogs, one tends to get up with fleas.

Well, since you just watch the dogs, I guess that lets you off the hook?
You can't help but preach and judge. Ms. Daniels may not be your cup of tea. Let's just leave it at that

Let's get back to talking about Mr. Strzok - who as far as we both know has not hitched his wagon to Ms. Daniels. Is his character more to your liking?

P.S. Redneck - there's more in your post I'd like to address - but this really isn't the place for it. If you don't start a new thread - I just might. But, not tonight :-)


So she consensually banged Trump over 10 yrs ago when he was nowhere near politics, and she was paid $130K for her troubles. Tell me how this is a problem today? Also, nobody called porn stars evil, but you'd be lying if you didn't admit it is indeed a dark industry with some rather seedy and unscrupulous people. Also, having sex while being filmed is akin to being filmed taking a dump into a bag as it is basically "performing" a bodily function as opposed to actual art that takes real talent.




posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 06:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis


You don't seem to be very objective . I'm mostly interested in this idea you have that you can detect dishonesty in a person based on where people fall on your naughtiness meter. Ms Daniels is a dirty girl - low class - making movies you seem to like in an industry you support. So, because of this - she is automatically a liar?

You seem to be stuck in a bit of binary thinking. Not everything is black or white... actually very few are.

I know you won't understand this... but I'm a glutton for punishment, so I'll try again.

It is not just the fact that Stormy Daniels is a porn star. That is a red flag, not a absolute indicator. But her attorney is an opportunist, unprincipled ambulance-chaser under investigation himself. There's another red flag. She is still dancing, while trying to present an aura of superiority over the President. Another red flag. She got herself arrested doing so. Another red flag. She signed a non-disclosure agreement so she could cash in on an affair with a celebrity figure at a sensitive time (read: extortion). Add two more red flags there. She then reneged on her agreement she was paid to execute (read: theft by fraud). There's a dozen red flags there.

Her occupation causes me to be suspicious of her motives. Most porn stars are quite money-hungry, which is why they became porn stars on the first place. It's the same reason that leads some people to become drug dealers, gun runners, etc. I am suspicious of them, too.

I know there are some people, mainly young girls, who do things like work as a stripper to get through college. I am suspicious of them, too, until they get their degree and move on. Then I can admire their character.

It's confusing, isn't it? Actually looking at clues to character instead of just reading the letter next to their name or letting some guy on TV tell you what you should think. Sorry, that's the way I do it.


Well, since you just watch the dogs, I guess that lets you off the hook?

What hook? You think I'm on some kind of hook? Yeah, I like to watch a little porn occasionally... I think most people do, although a good number are too insecure to admit it... some too insecure to even allow themselves the guilty pleasure. I'm comfortable with who I am. I'm well past the Beavis and Butthead stage of life, so you can quit trying to use those tactics. They just make you look immature.

The only hook is not being comfortable with who one is.


Let's get back to talking about Mr. Strzok - who as far as we both know has not hitched his wagon to Ms. Daniels. Is his character more to your liking?

Nope.

My initial opinion of him, like my initial opinion of any FBI agent, was someone who was likely a bit of a bully, but who would counter that inclination with professionalism. After hearing of his texts, I realized he might not fit that mold. During the hearing, I saw someone who was arrogant, power-hungry, and dishonest. Those are not character traits I admire.


P.S. Redneck - there's more in your post I'd like to address - but this really isn't the place for it. If you don't start a new thread - I just might. But, not tonight :-)

Feel free.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Love a girl who's not afraid to hit.
Knows how to throw a punch.
Go stormy.



Yes.... Lets ALL hope our daughters grow up to be just like her...….

/sarcasm.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: CrawlingChaos

never thought I would see any here cheerlead for domestic violence in any form.....



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   
Is it true that him and Lisa Page never really had an affair and that's actually used as a coverup?



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
Is it true that him and Lisa Page never really had an affair and that's actually used as a coverup?


Until we see some 'sexytime' texts & pics...it's still up for debate.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: toysforadults
Is it true that him and Lisa Page never really had an affair and that's actually used as a coverup?


Until we see some 'sexytime' texts & pics...it's still up for debate.



Can I just take your word for it ?

I mean... Do I have to see them ?!?

edit on 16-7-2018 by CrawlingChaos because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I heard them talking about it on a podcast today sure did make a lot of sense

Also apparently Stroke was raised in Iran and Saudi Arabia

Kind odd



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: IAMTAT

I heard them talking about it on a podcast today sure did make a lot of sense

Also apparently Stroke was raised in Iran and Saudi Arabia

Kind odd


Everything about Strzok is "odd"...in a very 'clownish' way.



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trey Gowdy did really look pretty angry during that press conference I think he knows something.

www.washingtonpost.com... utm_term=.21d7f3b3438b

The reason I think he's saying this is because there's something going on for some reason that can't be revealed. I got this idea watching the testimonies of Stroke (intentional misspelling) and Rosenstein



posted on Jul, 16 2018 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trey Gowdy did really look pretty angry during that press conference I think he knows something.

www.washingtonpost.com... utm_term=.21d7f3b3438b

The reason I think he's saying this is because there's something going on for some reason that can't be revealed. I got this idea watching the testimonies of Stroke (intentional misspelling) and Rosenstein


I agree.
I think Gowdy was finessing Strzok to publicly deny (under oath) rather than get answers.

Seasoned prosecutors NEVER ask questions that they don't already know the answers to.



posted on Jul, 17 2018 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck


Her occupation causes me to be suspicious of her motives. Most porn stars are quite money-hungry, which is why they became porn stars on the first place. It's the same reason that leads some people to become drug dealers, gun runners, etc. I am suspicious of them, too.

HAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

Golly Redneck :-)

So, to be clear - you are a consumer and self described connoisseur of porn - and something of an expert on what most porn stars are after. Because you know them so well

Porn user = integrity, honesty, wisdom... because: just logic

Person that makes your porn possible: no good, lying, low life gold digger, because: logic!


It's confusing, isn't it? Actually looking at clues to character instead of just reading the letter next to their name or letting some guy on TV tell you what you should think. Sorry, that's the way I do it.

Like I said - comedy gold - and apparently no bottom to this bucket

Yes, Redneck - that is just the way you roll

I think Stormy has her reasons. I think they're not something you would understand




edit on 7/17/2018 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
66
<< 58  59  60   >>

log in

join