It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CajunMetal
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: face23785
If this was accidental in nature, then this serves to highlight problems in the system that, to me, should have been anticipated.
That's actually been the entire point of everything I've said on this issue.
I think people have made some good speculations on this being, at worst, something other than a mistake, and at best, a mistake they most definitely learned something from.
There’s a difference between speculation on a conspiracy site and “just making # up”.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: CajunMetal
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: face23785
If this was accidental in nature, then this serves to highlight problems in the system that, to me, should have been anticipated.
That's actually been the entire point of everything I've said on this issue.
I think people have made some good speculations on this being, at worst, something other than a mistake, and at best, a mistake they most definitely learned something from.
There’s a difference between speculation on a conspiracy site and “just making # up”.
Speculation should at least be based in some kind of reasoning, not just making something up because you don't want to believe "the official story". In this case, all the available info points to it was a mistake.
originally posted by: Cauliflower
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Since all of the news agencies ran the same story at the exact same time we know there is a breaking news wire that could be compromised. ATS and Twitter connect local witnesses that can be used to corroborate or refute that official line. So it would be a little more difficult to broadcast a convincing Pearl Harbor attack with so much interactive media these days.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: CajunMetal
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: face23785
If this was accidental in nature, then this serves to highlight problems in the system that, to me, should have been anticipated.
That's actually been the entire point of everything I've said on this issue.
I think people have made some good speculations on this being, at worst, something other than a mistake, and at best, a mistake they most definitely learned something from.
There’s a difference between speculation on a conspiracy site and “just making # up”.
Speculation should at least be based in some kind of reasoning, not just making something up because you don't want to believe "the official story". In this case, all the available info points to it was a mistake.
It is unreasonable to believe that the 38 minutes it took to inform the public that it was a false alarm was unintentional.
Can HEMA notify the public of a tsunami or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it? Can they send an Amber Alert when a child is missing or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it?
Can the local news interrupt previously scheduled programs with breaking news?
I think all the info we have says that 38 minutes without correction was intentional. Therefore, I think the sounding of the alarm was intentional, too, despite the 'official story' which is the ONLY info that suggests it was unintentional.
So I think the "available info" suggests my conclusion is correct, not yours.
Besides, the motivation to lie makes the information that you are relying on dubious at best.
Agree to disagree, but don't pretend you have solid facts and information. You have a story from a government agency with a lot of motivation to cover their butts.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I don't buy the 'wrong button' story, computers have CTRL ALT DEL to solve a problem, and the US military shouldn't have a single button to determine the difference, they aren't traffic lights for Pete's Sake.
Red means Bad, Yellow means watch out and green means OK but even still knowing that means (a) The warning was 'staged' (b) the user was not adequately trained (c) The UI is crap-take your pick. All I know is the locals had their pants scared off, a caller to a radio station I was listening to said some folk were on their knees praying, I hope this doesn't turn into the boy who cried wolf.
a reply to: MotherMayEye
. It is unreasonable to believe that the 38 minutes it took to inform the public that it was a false alarm was unintentional.
Can HEMA notify the public of a tsunami or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it? Can they send an Amber Alert when a child is missing or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it?
originally posted by: Catch_a_Fire
I briefly mentioned this in another thread but it's hard to believe this could have been a mistake. There's no one button that can be pressed as a mistake. I'm sure it would have, at least, had to go through a person in charge or two before authority to raise the alert was given.
Whatever it was..... it isn't what we're being told..... IMO.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: MotherMayEye
. It is unreasonable to believe that the 38 minutes it took to inform the public that it was a false alarm was unintentional.
Can HEMA notify the public of a tsunami or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it? Can they send an Amber Alert when a child is missing or do they have to wait 38 minutes to do it?
Wonder how the Hawaii EMA (Emergency Management Agency)
1) Sent out a false alert of missile attack
2) Took 38 minutes to cancel it
Refer to this article from Boston Herald 6 months ago outlining steps would take in case of missile attack
www.thegatewaypundit.com...
The Herald showed pictures of computer monitors with passwords written on Post-It notes stuck to the screen !
Example : Password Warningpoint2
Remember never attribute to conspiracy which can be explained by stupidity ......
Stupidity seems to abound here ........
originally posted by: parad0x122
originally posted by: Catch_a_Fire
I briefly mentioned this in another thread but it's hard to believe this could have been a mistake. There's no one button that can be pressed as a mistake. I'm sure it would have, at least, had to go through a person in charge or two before authority to raise the alert was given.
Whatever it was..... it isn't what we're being told..... IMO.
Do you have proof of there being "no one button"? I've personally designed and tested mass notification systems for a living, and guess what, once you get to the menu asking what type of alert you'd like to send, there is in fact an "Initiate" button next to each of the labels. Throw in some automated logic that is fed data from systems, and I find it hard to believe that it hasn't happened more often.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: face23785
I'm not embarrassed. But I would be if I said I believed their hands were tied for 38 minutes and no one could call the local news or send out alert warning letting people know it was a false alarm.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: face23785
No. I don't believe that Hawaii could send no alerts, at all, during those 38 minutes.
No Amber Alerts, no severe weather warnings, no tsunami warnings...because they sent out a missile alert.
Nope. I don't believe that.
When I get any alerts, they always contain UNIQUE information. Not some pre-programmed message that is the same every time.